Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
It's time for the 6 monthly discussion of the failure of the horology
tests during DST changeover.
This will go away whenever we fix the interval datatype to distinguish
'1 day' from '24 hours'. In the meantime, it reminds us o
Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It's time for the 6 monthly discussion of the failure of the horology
> tests during DST changeover.
This will go away whenever we fix the interval datatype to distinguish
'1 day' from '24 hours'. In the meantime, it reminds us of the work we
need t
It's time for the 6 monthly discussion of the failure of the horology
tests during DST changeover.
I'd like to find a way to avoid this, so we don't get spurious buildfarm
failures for 2 or 3 days every six months. ISTM the first thing is to
isolate the tests that are sensitive to it into a se
