On 2/18/17 4:26 PM, Jim Nasby wrote:
On 2/17/17 9:53 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Jim Nasby wrote:
See below. ISTM that pg_get_object_address should support everything
pg_identify_object_as_address can output, no?
I'm guessing the answer here is to have pg_identify_object_as_address
complain if
On 2/17/17 9:53 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Jim Nasby wrote:
See below. ISTM that pg_get_object_address should support everything
pg_identify_object_as_address can output, no?
I'm guessing the answer here is to have pg_identify_object_as_address
complain if you ask it for something that's not
On 2/17/17 9:53 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Another way to think about this problem is an approach Peter E suggested
not long ago, which was to change the objname/objargs representation
more completely.
Hrm, I didn't see that. What was the idea?
BTW, I do find it odd (and might eventually find
Jim Nasby wrote:
> See below. ISTM that pg_get_object_address should support everything
> pg_identify_object_as_address can output, no?
>
> I'm guessing the answer here is to have pg_identify_object_as_address
> complain if you ask it for something that's not mapable.
Yes, I think we should just
See below. ISTM that pg_get_object_address should support everything
pg_identify_object_as_address can output, no?
I'm guessing the answer here is to have pg_identify_object_as_address
complain if you ask it for something that's not mapable.
~@decina.local/5621# CREATE TYPE comp AS (a int,
