Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] UnixWare/CVS Tip/initdb.c needs to use threads

2004-03-22 Thread Bruce Momjian
Bruce Momjian wrote: Larry Rosenman wrote: The a.out (not any library) should be linked with -Kpthread (not -lpthread). This will force libthread to be linked in the right order relative to libc, libC, networking libraries, etc. In other words, the entire application either is or

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] UnixWare/CVS Tip/initdb.c needs to use

2004-03-22 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Monday, March 22, 2004 09:52:54 -0500 Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Bruce Momjian wrote: Larry Rosenman wrote: The a.out (not any library) should be linked with -Kpthread (not -lpthread). This will force libthread to be linked in the right order relative to libc, libC,

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] UnixWare/CVS Tip/initdb.c needs to use

2004-03-22 Thread Bruce Momjian
Larry Rosenman wrote: One other option is to disable threads on this platform for 7.5 unless we find another platforms that need this to use threads. That is the direction I will take for the moment. If someone needs a threaded libpq on this platform, then can enable threads, compile

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] UnixWare/CVS Tip/initdb.c needs to use

2004-03-22 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Monday, March 22, 2004 12:33:56 -0500 Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Larry Rosenman wrote: One other option is to disable threads on this platform for 7.5 unless we find another platforms that need this to use threads. That is the direction I will take for the moment. If

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] UnixWare/CVS Tip/initdb.c needs to use

2004-03-22 Thread Tom Lane
Larry Rosenman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I really, really, really want to see threads enabled for libpq for this platform, especially since SCO will be distributing it at some point in time. I think very few of the folks on this list will see that as a reason why they should expend any effort;

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] UnixWare/CVS Tip/initdb.c needs to use

2004-03-22 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Monday, March 22, 2004 12:49:00 -0500 Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Larry Rosenman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I really, really, really want to see threads enabled for libpq for this platform, especially since SCO will be distributing it at some point in time. I think very few of the

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] UnixWare/CVS Tip/initdb.c needs to use

2004-03-22 Thread Tom Lane
Larry Rosenman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: --On Monday, March 22, 2004 12:49:00 -0500 Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED]=20 wrote: If you can fix it yourself in a reasonably non-intrusive way, we'll take the patch ... that's about the extent of the cooperation you can expect. would a dlsym-based

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] UnixWare/CVS Tip/initdb.c needs to use

2004-03-22 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Monday, March 22, 2004 13:15:15 -0500 Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Larry Rosenman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: --On Monday, March 22, 2004 12:49:00 -0500 Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED]=20 wrote: If you can fix it yourself in a reasonably non-intrusive way, we'll take the patch ... that's

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] UnixWare/CVS Tip/initdb.c needs to use threads

2004-03-21 Thread Bruce Momjian
Larry Rosenman wrote: The a.out (not any library) should be linked with -Kpthread (not -lpthread). This will force libthread to be linked in the right order relative to libc, libC, networking libraries, etc. In other words, the entire application either is or is not linked with threads;