Dave,
> Hiroshi Saito has made a number of smaller but important contributions
> this cycle.
Thanks. I was being surprised to see only one Japanese contributor this
cycle.
> Heikki is from Finland, but currently living in the UK.
Thanks!
> You also missed my name despite it being attributed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 14:16:16 -0500 (EST)
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I believe the reason we don't publicize who is a committer is that
> > we have non-committers who do a lot more for the project. Commit
> > rights are usually given
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > > I don't have a problem with that, but I think core code committers
> > > and www maintainers should be identified separately.
> >
> > Why? Then we have to also separate advocacy which is just as important
> > and pgfoundry... as well as possibly
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
>
> --On Wednesday, November 28, 2007 08:20:04 -0800 "Joshua D. Drake"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>Core <-- this is obvious
>>Committers <-- this is obvious the only question is it only
>> committers to the source tree or do we want to give equal billing t
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > I don't have a problem with that, but I think core code committers
> > and www maintainers should be indentified separately.
>
> Why? Then we have to also separate advocacy which is just as important
> and pgfoundry... as well as possibly a host of others. We all have ou
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 15:06:58 -0400
"Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
>
> - --On Wednesday, November 28, 2007 08:20:04 -0800 "Joshua D. Drake"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --On Wednesday, November 28, 2007 08:20:04 -0800 "Joshua D. Drake"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Core <-- this is obvious
>Committers <-- this is obvious the only question is it only
> committers to the source tree or do we want to give equ
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 13:50:02 -0500
Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You are being overly sensitive. I never suggested otherwise. I simply
> suggested that the roles people do in fact play should be public.
And I was only pointing to a log
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 13:15:52 -0500
Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
Committers <-- this is obvious the only question is it only
committers to the source tree or do we want to give
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 12:33:52 -0600
"Kevin Grittner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 11:34 AM, in message
> >>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > We don't generally add anybody who just
>>> On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 11:34 AM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We don't generally add anybody who just provides a single patch, ever.
> They go in the release notes, but we only add people who've been around
> for a while to this list at all.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 13:15:52 -0500
Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> >Committers <-- this is obvious the only question is it only
> > committers to the source tree or do we want to give equal billing to
> >
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
Committers <-- this is obvious the only question is it only
committers to the source tree or do we want to give equal billing to
the -www guys (I think yes to equal billing)
I don't have a problem with that, but I think core code committers and
www maintainers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 18:34:57 +0100
Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Now that seems reasonable.
> >
> > Core
> > Regular contributors
> > Occasional contributors
> > Past contributors
> >
> > Core and Regular should be on the same page
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 16:53:43 +
> Dave Page <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>>> On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 16:27:42 +
>>> Dave Page <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
Why not Hackers? Noone is a 'member' of anything except core or
mayber the we
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 16:53:43 +
Dave Page <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 16:27:42 +
> > Dave Page <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Why not Hackers? Noone is a 'member' of anything except core or
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 16:27:42 +
> Dave Page <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Why not Hackers? Noone is a 'member' of anything except core or mayber
>> the web/infrastructure team.
>
> Define Hacker. And I could argue that some are members of PGDG.
Says he who only the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 16:27:42 +
Dave Page <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Actually we've previously agreed (in -core) that we do not want to
> list committers for various reasons. Yeah, I know the list isn't too
> hard to figure out, but we don't want
"Joshua D. Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 13:58:27 +
> Gregory Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> "Gregory Stark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > "Josh Berkus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> >
>> >> All,
>> >>
>> >> Time for the annual update of this list:
>>
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Not to mention there don't seem to be any defined rules. I asked Berkus
> and his reply was, "It has always been a little fuzzy". I asked Devrim
> and he gave me 5 bullet points that don't quite make sense.
Not sure what Devrim is referring to, but most often in the past R
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 13:58:27 +
Gregory Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Gregory Stark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > "Josh Berkus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >> All,
> >>
> >> Time for the annual update of this list:
> >>...
> >> Gr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 09:46:36 +
Dave Page <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I should also point out that the contributor list has always included
> people who have contributed to non-core community projects in the past
> as well - psqlODBC, the JDBC dr
Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote:
> yeah well - the release notes do not make that good a reference on the
> "who submitted patches" question anyway because the do not contain stuff
> that are mere compile failures or add support for additional
> platforms/cleanups) of new features (ie my patches to add
Dave Page wrote:
Josh Berkus wrote:
All,
Time for the annual update of this list:
http://www.postgresql.org/developer/bios
Here's the list of people I gleaned from the release notes (btw, if people
have countries for the folks who aren't attributed, I'd appreciate them).
Of course, there ar
Josh Berkus wrote:
> All,
>
> Time for the annual update of this list:
> http://www.postgresql.org/developer/bios
>
> Here's the list of people I gleaned from the release notes (btw, if people
> have countries for the folks who aren't attributed, I'd appreciate them).
> Of course, there are ma
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 16:08:36 -0800
Josh Berkus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> All,
>
> Time for the annual update of this list:
> http://www.postgresql.org/developer/bios
>
> Here's the list of people I gleaned from the release notes (btw, if
> people
26 matches
Mail list logo
