On 11/29/2010 01:30 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Dunstan writes:
On 11/29/2010 12:36 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
But that could equally well be stored in a user table rather than a
system table.
Yeah. The trouble is you won't be able to use that reliably in a check
constraint, which I imagine is o
Andrew Dunstan writes:
> On 11/29/2010 12:36 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
>> But that could equally well be stored in a user table rather than a
>> system table.
> Yeah. The trouble is you won't be able to use that reliably in a check
> constraint, which I imagine is one of the principal intended purp
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 12:56 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> On 11/29/2010 12:36 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 12:18 PM, Pavel Stehule
>> wrote:
>>> 2010/11/29 Robert Haas:
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 5:33 AM, Tomáš Pospíšil
wrote:
> I have idea of creating system tabl
On 11/29/2010 12:36 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 12:18 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
2010/11/29 Robert Haas:
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 5:33 AM, Tomáš Pospíšil wrote:
I have idea of creating system table for holding DTDs, XSDs, Relax-NGs (similar
as on ORACLE).
Is that good ide
2010/11/29 Robert Haas :
> On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 12:18 PM, Pavel Stehule
> wrote:
>> 2010/11/29 Robert Haas :
>>> On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 5:33 AM, Tomáš Pospíšil wrote:
I have idea of creating system table for holding DTDs, XSDs, Relax-NGs
(similar as on ORACLE).
Is that g
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 12:18 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> 2010/11/29 Robert Haas :
>> On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 5:33 AM, Tomáš Pospíšil wrote:
>>> I have idea of creating system table for holding DTDs, XSDs, Relax-NGs
>>> (similar as on ORACLE).
>>>
>>> Is that good idea?
>>
>> I doubt it. Why wou
2010/11/29 Robert Haas :
> On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 5:33 AM, Tomáš Pospíšil wrote:
>> I have idea of creating system table for holding DTDs, XSDs, Relax-NGs
>> (similar as on ORACLE).
>>
>> Is that good idea?
>
> I doubt it. Why would we want to do that?
If I understand, it allows a local copy o
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 5:33 AM, Tomáš Pospíšil wrote:
> I have idea of creating system table for holding DTDs, XSDs, Relax-NGs
> (similar as on ORACLE).
>
> Is that good idea?
I doubt it. Why would we want to do that?
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Po
On 11/28/2010 05:33 AM, Tomáš Pospíšil wrote:
Hi,
I am working on patch adding xmlvalidate() functionality. LibXML 2.7.7 improved
DTD, XSD, Relax-NG validation, so using that. I have idea of creating system
table for holding DTDs, XSDs, Relax-NGs (similar as on ORACLE).
Is that good idea? I
