Re: [HACKERS] Performance while loading data and indexing

2002-09-26 Thread Tom Lane
"Shridhar Daithankar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 26 Sep 2002 at 11:50, Mario Weilguni wrote: >> Just an idea, I noticed you use char(10) for esn and min, and use this as >> index. Are these really fixed len fields all having 10 bytes? > 10 bytes. Those are id numbers.. like phone numbers al

Re: [HACKERS] Performance while loading data and indexing

2002-09-26 Thread Shridhar Daithankar
On 26 Sep 2002 at 11:50, Mario Weilguni wrote: > >Well the test runs were for 10GB of data. Schema is attached. Read in fixed > >fonts..Last nullable fields are dummies but may be used in fututre and > varchars > >are not acceptable(Not my requirement). Tuple size is around 100 bytes.. > >The i

Re: [HACKERS] Performance while loading data and indexing

2002-09-26 Thread Mario Weilguni
>Well the test runs were for 10GB of data. Schema is attached. Read in fixed >fonts..Last nullable fields are dummies but may be used in fututre and varchars >are not acceptable(Not my requirement). Tuple size is around 100 bytes.. >The index creation query was > >CREATE INDEX index1 ON tablenam

Re: [HACKERS] Performance while loading data and indexing

2002-09-26 Thread Shridhar Daithankar
On 26 Sep 2002 at 11:17, Mario Weilguni wrote: > On 26 Sep 2002 at 14:05, Shridhar Daithankar wrote: > > Some time back I posted a query to build a site with 150GB of database. In > last > > couple of weeks, lots of things were tested at my place and there are some > > results and again some co

Re: [HACKERS] Performance while loading data and indexing

2002-09-26 Thread Mario Weilguni
On 26 Sep 2002 at 14:05, Shridhar Daithankar wrote: > Some time back I posted a query to build a site with 150GB of database. In last > couple of weeks, lots of things were tested at my place and there are some > results and again some concerns. > 2) Creating index takes huge amount of time. >

Re: [HACKERS] Performance while loading data and indexing

2002-09-26 Thread Shridhar Daithankar
On 26 Sep 2002 at 10:51, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi, > it seems you have to cluster it, I don't think you have another choise. Hmm.. That didn't occur to me...I guess some real time clustering like usogres would do. Unless it turns out to be a performance hog.. But this is just insert a

Re: [HACKERS] Performance while loading data and indexing

2002-09-26 Thread Shridhar Daithankar
On 26 Sep 2002 at 14:05, Shridhar Daithankar wrote: > Some time back I posted a query to build a site with 150GB of database. In last > couple of weeks, lots of things were tested at my place and there are some > results and again some concerns. > 2) Creating index takes huge amount of time. >