> Mainly it's a schedule-driven thing. I don't want to take any risk that
> a last-minute patch to work around AIX's broken compiler will break any
> other platforms. If we had found this problem before beta cycle
> started, I would be more willing to say "let's try it and find out
> whether it
* Ian Lance Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010326 01:14]:
> Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/home/ler/pg-dev/pgsql/doc/src/sgml'
> > > cd sgml && tar -cf ../programmer.tar --exclude=Makefile
> > > --exclude='*.s
Hi,
There's no bug with regexp, because "*" operator in
regex match zero or more times. So if you want
match exactly your patern try ~ 'ibd01.*' . "." match an
arbitrary character.
Cheers,
PEJAC Pascal
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: Have you ch
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Tom Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> No, just compile and install. If you'd been on beta5 or earlier, you'd
> need to run contrib/pg_resetxlog to update pg_control format, but still
> no initdb.
Thanks, Tom!
Just so you know: I've built a test database in Pos
Hi all,
We're using PG 7.0 and 7.1beta and are having dead lock problems. The docs
say the Postgres detects dead locks and automatically rolls back 1
transaction to recover but this is not our experience. Are the docs
incorrect or is this more serious?
Thanks,
--Rainer
--
"Rainer Mager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> We're using PG 7.0 and 7.1beta and are having dead lock problems. The docs
> say the Postgres detects dead locks and automatically rolls back 1
> transaction to recover but this is not our experience. Are the docs
> incorrect or is this more serious?
W
PostgreSQL typically uses port 5432 for client-server communications.
It would be a good idea to register this with IANA. This will help to
avoid a clash with other services that might try to use the port.
DB2, Interbase, MS SQL, MySQL, Oracle, Sybase, etc. are already
registered.
Might someone
> >> Suddenly I obtain access to
> >> ULTRIX black 4.3 1 RISC
> > Uh ... what kind of processor is that? Offhand I don't see any
> > indication that any of the entries in s_lock.h are supposed to work
> > for Ultrix.
As mentioned earlier, Ultrix on RISC means that it is a MIPS processor.
DEC imp
The list of unreported or "in progress" platforms has gotten much
shorter. If anyone can help on the remaining problems, we'll be able to
move closer to release status, which is A Good Thing (tm) ;)
btw, if we get most of these qualified, we will be on around 30
platforms
-
I posted this to the list a few days ago, but it was not addressed. Can
someone please make the changes to the src/test/regress/resultmap?
Thanks.
- brandon
b. palmer, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgp: www.crimelabs.net/bpalmer.pgp5
*** resultmap.orig Fri Mar 23 12:34:56 2001
--- resultmap.n
Applied. I thought there was some openbsd confusion results so I
ignored the previous patch.
> I posted this to the list a few days ago, but it was not addressed. Can
> someone please make the changes to the src/test/regress/resultmap?
>
> Thanks.
>
> - brandon
>
>
> b. palmer, [EMAIL PRO
Thomas Lockhart writes:
> SCO OpenServer 5 x86 7.1 2001-03-13, Billy Allie
Where did you see this? I don't find it in the archives or in Vince's
database.
--
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://yi.org/peter-e/
---(end of broadcast)-
> > SCO OpenServer 5 x86 7.1 2001-03-13, Billy Allie
> Where did you see this? I don't find it in the archives or in Vince's
> database.
In FAQ_SCO. I was looking to try to figure out what the differences were
between the SCO products :)
- Thomas
--
Since the SCO UDK works on both UnixWare and OpenServer, I think we are
pretty safe. Also, there was a post to -HACKERS about the accept bug and
we changed the workaround to include OSR5.
I'd leave it until disproved. I don't have a OSR5 installation to check
it with, however.
LER
>
Thomas Lockhart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Linux 2.2.18 PPC750 7.1 2001-03-19, Tom Lane
"PPC750"? What's that? "PPC G3" might be more likely to mean something
to onlookers ...
regards, tom lane
---(end of broadcast)---
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Applied. I thought there was some openbsd confusion results so I
> ignored the previous patch.
Yeah, I thought there was still some debate about whether we knew the
correct resultmap for *bsd or not ...
regards, tom lane
-
Thomas Lockhart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> As mentioned earlier, Ultrix on RISC means that it is a MIPS processor.
>> I suspect that some one of the implementations in s_lock.h was intended
>> to be usable on Ultrix, and we've somehow dropped the declarations
>> needed to make it go. You migh
Thomas Lockhart writes:
> > > SCO OpenServer 5 x86 7.1 2001-03-13, Billy Allie
> > Where did you see this? I don't find it in the archives or in Vince's
> > database.
>
> In FAQ_SCO. I was looking to try to figure out what the differences were
> between the SCO products :)
I wouldn't necessar
Hi,
I know I'm a bit early to submit stuff for 7.2, but attached is a patch
(agains 7.1RC1) to add uint2 and uint4 as new types. I haven't put in
all the possible combinations of signed and unsigned ints as arguments
to operators -- I was going insane just doing it for all combinations of
> "PPC750"? What's that? "PPC G3" might be more likely to mean something
> to onlookers ...
Actually "G3" means nothing outside of Apple afaict. The 750 series is a
follow-on to the 60x series, and there is a 7xxx series also. From my
pov, using an accepted label, rather than a marketing (re)la
> > As mentioned earlier, Ultrix on RISC means that it is a MIPS processor.
> > Any hints for Alexander on how to do it *if* it is a MIPS processor?
> Not sure. The only info I see in s_lock.h is in the "SGI" section:
> * This stuff may be supplemented in the future with Masato Kataoka's MIPS-II
> > > > SCO OpenServer 5 x86 7.1 2001-03-13, Billy Allie
> > > Where did you see this? I don't find it in the archives or in Vince's
> > > database.
> > In FAQ_SCO. I was looking to try to figure out what the differences were
> > between the SCO products :)
> I wouldn't necessarily count someth
I would.
LER
--
Larry Rosenman
http://www.lerctr.org/~ler/
Phone: +1 972 414 9812
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 7
Karl DeBisschop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In my tests on sparc/7 my compile died at line 3088 of
> postgresql-7.1beta6/src/interfaces/python/pgmodule.c:
> ./pgmodule.c:3088: parse error before `init_pg'
> That's line 3137 of today's (22Mar) snapshot, which reads:
> /* Initialization functio
Hi
Is there a list somewhere listing the platforms 7.1 is being
tested on right now? I'd be able to run regression tests on
the following platforms, if necessary:
FreeBSD 3.3 (x86)
FreeBSD 4.2 (x86)
Linux (x86 - 2.2 & 2.4 kernels, Redhat & Debian distro's)
Solaris 7 (SPARC)
Solaris 8 (
Thomas Lockhart wrote:
> Linux 2.2.x Alpha 7.1 2001-01-23, Ryan Kirkpatrick
> Linux 2.2.x armv4l 7.1 2001-03-22, Mark Knox
> Linux 2.2.18 PPC750 7.1 2001-03-19, Tom Lane
> Linux 2.2.x S/390 7.1 2000-11-17, Neale Ferguson
> Linux 2.2.15 Sparc 7.1 2001-01-30, Ryan Kirkpatrick
> Linux 2.2.16 x86
Lamar Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Thomas Lockhart wrote:
> > Linux 2.2.x Alpha 7.1 2001-01-23, Ryan Kirkpatrick
> > Linux 2.2.x armv4l 7.1 2001-03-22, Mark Knox
> > Linux 2.2.18 PPC750 7.1 2001-03-19, Tom Lane
> > Linux 2.2.x S/390 7.1 2000-11-17, Neale Ferguson
> > Linux 2.2.15 Sparc 7.
> Did you get the message from Trond about Linux 2.4 x86? I can also
> verify all tests passed on a RedHat Public Beta installation with kernel
> 2.4.
Trond had indicated that it was a 2.4.2 kernel with lots 'o patches, so
I figured I'd show the released stuff for now. I mentioned 2.4.2 in the
c
On Tue, 27 Mar 2001, Mathijs Brands wrote:
> Hi
>
> Is there a list somewhere listing the platforms 7.1 is being
> tested on right now? I'd be able to run regression tests on
> the following platforms, if necessary:
>
> FreeBSD 3.3 (x86)
> FreeBSD 4.2 (x86)
> Linux (x86 - 2.2 & 2.4 kernels
On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 05:41:31PM -0500, Vince Vielhaber allegedly wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Mar 2001, Mathijs Brands wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > Is there a list somewhere listing the platforms 7.1 is being
> > tested on right now? I'd be able to run regression tests on
> > the following platforms, if necess
Trond Eivind Glomsrød wrote:
> Lamar Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Did you get the message from Trond about Linux 2.4 x86? I can also
> > verify all tests passed on a RedHat Public Beta installation with kernel
> > 2.4.
> I haven't put those in the list yet... I'll wait until we release
Mathijs Brands wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> Is there a list somewhere listing the platforms 7.1 is being
> tested on right now? I'd be able to run regression tests on
> the following platforms, if necessary:
http://www.postgresql.org/devel-corner/docs/admin/supported-platforms.html
is close to up to date
Thomas Lockhart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Anyway, the last CVS update to port/ultrix.h that appears to have come
>> from someone actually using Ultrix was rev 1.2 on 7-May-97, which
>> predates the very existence of s_lock.h as a separate file. So I'd
>> definitely advise Alexander to find a
On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 06:35:59PM -0500, Tom Lane allegedly wrote:
> Thomas Lockhart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> Anyway, the last CVS update to port/ultrix.h that appears to have come
> >> from someone actually using Ultrix was rev 1.2 on 7-May-97, which
> >> predates the very existence of s
> >NetBSD m68k7.0 2000-04-10, Henry B. Hotz
> I no longer have a 68k machine that's fast enough to reasonably test
> PG on. I have a IIcx that sometimes serves as a router, but I'm
> using some second-generation powermac's mostly now. (You still have
> that Centris in your closet Tom?)
> The non-test-and-set case should work again in current CVS, and I'd
> appreciate it if Alexander would verify that. But as far as getting
> some test-and-set support for MIPS goes, it looks like the only way
> is for someone to sit down with a MIPS assembly manual. I haven't
> got one, nor acc
Thomas Lockhart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> That is not already available from the Irix support code?
What we have for IRIX is
#if defined(__sgi)
/*
* SGI IRIX 5
* slock_t is defined as a unsigned long. We use the standard SGI
* mutex API.
*
* The following comment is left for historical
Thomas Lockhart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> "PPC750"? What's that? "PPC G3" might be more likely to mean something
>> to onlookers ...
> Actually "G3" means nothing outside of Apple afaict. The 750 series is a
> follow-on to the 60x series, and there is a 7xxx series also. From my
> pov, usi
"Joe Shevland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Semi-topical I hope ;)
Completely irrelevant to JDBC as far as I can see. I've redirected to
pghackers.
> NOTICE: Rel pg_attribute: TID 1/115: OID IS INVALID. TUPGONE 1.
> ...
> NOTICE: Rel pg_attribute: TID 1/6087: OID IS INVALID. TUPGONE 1.
> NOT
Hi,
I tested Solaris 8 SPARC (32 bit) over the weekend, and can test Solaris
8 INTEL this week/weekend.
The results of Solaris 8 SPARC were in Vince's database last time I
checked. ???
+ Justin
Mathijs Brands wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> Is there a list somewhere listing the platforms 7.1 is being
> t
I know that Sourceforge has been adding all sorts of machines to their
compile farm.
Maybe it would be worthwhile taking a look if they have platforms we
don't?
Regards and best wishes,
Justin Clift
Thomas Lockhart wrote:
>
> > The non-test-and-set case should work again in current CVS, and I
On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 12:01:24PM +1000, Justin Clift allegedly wrote:
> I know that Sourceforge has been adding all sorts of machines to their
> compile farm.
>
> Maybe it would be worthwhile taking a look if they have platforms we
> don't?
>
> Regards and best wishes,
>
> Justin Clift
Compa
On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 07:09:38PM -0500, Tom Lane allegedly wrote:
> Thomas Lockhart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > That is not already available from the Irix support code?
>
> What we have for IRIX is
>
> #if defined(__sgi)
> /*
> * SGI IRIX 5
> * slock_t is defined as a unsigned long. We
At 7:53 PM -0500 3/26/01, Tom Lane wrote:
>Thomas Lockhart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> "PPC750"? What's that? "PPC G3" might be more likely to mean something
>>> to onlookers ...
>
>> Actually "G3" means nothing outside of Apple afaict. The 750 series is a
>> follow-on to the 60x series, and
Mathijs Brands <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Notice the single underscore before volatile.
That's definitely wrong --- fixed.
> Fixing this causes
> as (the SGI version, not GNU as) to choke on the '.global tas' statement.
> s_lock.c: At top level:
> s_lock.c:234: warning: `tas_dummy' defined b
> Do you know whether anyone uses the GNU assembler on this platform,
> or is it always SGI's? I'm wondering if we need two versions of the
> assembly code ...
Sure. Both compilers are available, with SGI's, uh, unique approach, and
with GNU's well understood assembler.
> I had missed the fact
On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 07:09:38PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Thomas Lockhart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > That is not already available from the Irix support code?
>
> What we have for IRIX is
> ...
> Doesn't look to me like it's likely to work on anything but IRIX ...
I have attached linuxth
Hi there,
I just run 'make check' on RC1 and got the output below. I've read about
the negative zeros, but I haven't seen someone reporting a failure during
the random test, so I thought it would be good to report this one.
If you need additional information, please contact me.
Regards,
Matthi
Hi there.
I was just looking for the CVS tags for downloading the beta6 and the
RC1 of 7.1 but there are only the following tags:
REL_7_1_BETA2
REL_7_1_BETA3
REL_7_1
Aren't there tags for the versions I am looking for?
Regards,
Matthias
---(end of broadcast)-
Thomas Lockhart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> NetBSD Sparc 7.0 2000-04-13, Tom I. Helbekkmo
Fetching the latest source kit now -- hope to have regression tests
run and a report back to you within a day or two.
> We need some NetBSD folks to speak up!
I've once again got a VAX that should
"Mark Knox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 25 Mar 2001, at 16:07, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Does that database have any user-created relations in it, or is it
>> just a virgin database?
> Totally virgin. I created it just for that select you wanted.
Okay. Would you create a couple of random tables
could anyone compress Postgresql package in bzip2 format?
I am behind a slow line, to save me some bandwith, I would like
to download a package named postgresql-7.1RC1.tar.bz2 .
Regards,
XuYifeng
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: Have you search
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Nathan Myers) writes:
> Since the actual instruction sequence is probably lifted from the
> MIPS manual, it's probably much freer than GPL. For the paranoid,
> the actual instructions, extracted, are just
>
>1:
> ll %0,%3
> bnez %0,2f
> li %1,1
>
53 matches
Mail list logo
