Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Global Development Group

2002-12-09 Thread Tommi Maekitalo
Am Donnerstag, 5. Dezember 2002 05:22 schrieb Lamar Owen: [cc: list trimmed] On Wednesday 04 December 2002 22:52, Philip Warner wrote: At 05:48 PM 4/12/2002 -0800, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote: Lack of marketing is one of Postgres's major problems. What are the consequences of the

Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Global Development Group

2002-12-09 Thread Justin Clift
Hi Tommi, Tommi Maekitalo wrote: snip Hi, there are lots of sites talking about postgresql. But if someone hear about postgresql he sure tries www.postgresql.org. There he just get a list of mirrors. Not really a good start. But worse: there is no links to gborg, advocacy, techdocs, ...

Re: Porting from MySQL to PostgreSQL (was: [HACKERS] pgsql 7.2.3

2002-12-09 Thread Devrim GUNDUZ
Hi, On Mon, 2002-12-09 at 10:24, SEGUERRA FRANCIS TED ARANAS wrote: how do i port from mysql to postgresql?.. http://techdocs.postgresql.org/#convertfrom Best regards, . -- Devrim GUNDUZ TR.NET Sistem Destek Uzmani Tel : (312) 295 93 18 Fax : (312) 295 94 94 Tel : (216) 542 90 00

Re: [HACKERS] pgsql 7.2.3 crash

2002-12-09 Thread SEGUERRA FRANCIS TED ARANAS
how do i port from mysql to postgresql?... thanks bruce, francis -- ov3rr|d3r ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html

Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Global Development Group

2002-12-09 Thread Kevin Brown
Vince Vielhaber wrote: On Sun, 8 Dec 2002, Justin Clift wrote: Vince Vielhaber wrote: On Thu, 5 Dec 2002, Robert Treat wrote: Well, my previous employer uses postgresql, but they were under constant assault from their clients to use oracle or db2. Technically there was no

Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Global Development Group

2002-12-09 Thread Shridhar Daithankar
On 9 Dec 2002 at 1:20, Kevin Brown wrote: 2. They need 24x7 support, and are convinced that they'll get better support for Oracle or DB2 than anything else. I have experienced what oracle support means for 24x7. I wouldn't even wish that penalty for my worst enemy. I can tell a story

Re: Disabling triggers (was Re: [HACKERS] pgsql 7.2.3 crash)

2002-12-09 Thread Kevin Brown
Joe Conway wrote: The second case is usually something like an insert into the employee table fires off an email to IT to create a login and security to make a badge. Commonly we turn off workflows (by disabling their related triggers) in our development and test databases so someone

Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Global Development Group

2002-12-09 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On Sun, 8 Dec 2002, Josh Berkus wrote: But once Postgres has been packaged, we need to have a group making a loud enough noise to get the world to pay attention. I'm not asking everyone on this list to participate, but I am asking everyone on this list to recognize the utility of the

Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Global Development Group

2002-12-09 Thread Robert Treat
On Mon, 09 Dec 2002 07:29:55 -0500, Vince Vielhaber wrote: On Sun, 8 Dec 2002, Josh Berkus wrote: But once Postgres has been packaged, we need to have a group making a loud enough noise to get the world to pay attention. I'm not asking everyone on this list to participate, but I am asking

[HACKERS] DBD::Pg module on Windows

2002-12-09 Thread Rod Taylor
Does anybody know where I can find a newer DBD::Pg module for Windows NT? The only pre-compiled one I can find is 0.98, which is based on a PostgreSQL 7.0 library set. -- Rod Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP Key: http://www.rbt.ca/rbtpub.asc signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed

Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Global Development Group

2002-12-09 Thread Tom Lane
Vince Vielhaber [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: 1) They're marketing to those that are already sold on it. I think the upshot of the prior discussion was that the outside press release shouldn't have been used as the release announcement for the existing mailing lists. Fine, they made a one-time

Re: [HACKERS] Let's create a release team

2002-12-09 Thread Tom Lane
Dan Langille [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Let's create a release team. This strategy is one well established in other projects and in industry. For lack of a better starting reference, let me suggest http://www.freebsd.org/releng/charter.html as a starting point for consideration. See also

Re: Porting from MySQL to PostgreSQL (was: [HACKERS] pgsql 7.2.3

2002-12-09 Thread SEGUERRA FRANCIS TED ARANAS
thanks On 9 Dec 2002, Devrim GUNDUZ wrote: Hi, On Mon, 2002-12-09 at 10:24, SEGUERRA FRANCIS TED ARANAS wrote: how do i port from mysql to postgresql?.. http://techdocs.postgresql.org/#convertfrom Best regards, . -- ov3rr|d3r ---(end of

Re: [HACKERS] proposal: array utility functions phase 1

2002-12-09 Thread Tom Lane
Joe Conway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Yes, this is exactly what I was yearning to do. Was there a spec or technical reason (or both) for not allowing the following? select * from array_values(g.grolist), pg_group g where g.groname = 'g2'; This seems fairly unworkable to me as-is. By

Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Global Development Group

2002-12-09 Thread Josh Berkus
Vince, Here are my main problems with it. 1) They're marketing to those that are already sold on it. First off ... not they, you. I'm a member of Advocacy; so are Robert, Justin, Neil, Marc, Bruce and several other members of this list. The advocacy group is not some privately sponsored

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] Patch to make Turks happy.

2002-12-09 Thread Bruce Momjian
Peter, is that patch OK for 7.3.1? I am not sure. --- Peter Eisentraut wrote: Bruce Momjian writes: I am not going to apply this patch because I think it will mess up the handling of other locales. This patch

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] Patch to make Turks happy.

2002-12-09 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Bruce Momjian writes: Peter, is that patch OK for 7.3.1? I am not sure. Definitely. It's a bug fix. -- Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command

Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Global Development Group

2002-12-09 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Robert Treat writes: I think we've already shown why it doesn't hurt to market to the converted. I'll add that if you compare the 7.2 press release with the 7.3 press release, you'll see none of the technical content was removed. Compare the 7.3 release notes, written for the most part by

Re: [HACKERS] DB Tuning Notes for comment...

2002-12-09 Thread Robert Treat
On Sun, 2002-12-08 at 09:41, Philip Warner wrote: Any comments or suggestions would be welcome. first and foremost, this is really excellent work! We need to look into getting this info into the standard documentation and/or Bruce's tuning guide. Tuning == 1. max_fsm_relations

Re: [HACKERS] DB Tuning Notes for comment...

2002-12-09 Thread Scott Shattuck
Robert Treat wrote: On Sun, 2002-12-08 at 09:41, Philip Warner wrote: Any comments or suggestions would be welcome. first and foremost, this is really excellent work! We need to look into getting this info into the standard documentation and/or Bruce's tuning guide. Seconded! Tuning

[HACKERS] Sequence Cleanup

2002-12-09 Thread Rod Taylor
Below is a short list of TODOs on sequences I wish to tackle over the next week. CREATE SEQUENCE: - Addition of NO MAXVALUE and NO MINVALUE options, which use the system implementation settings -- for SQL2002 compliance, and makes ALTER SEQUENCE slightly easier. ALTER SEQUENCE: - Supports

Re: [HACKERS] DB Tuning Notes for comment...

2002-12-09 Thread Tom Lane
Robert Treat [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Sun, 2002-12-08 at 09:41, Philip Warner wrote: First of all, the free space manager is useless at managing free space if it can not map all relations (including system relations and toast relations). The following query should give the correct

Re: [HACKERS] DB Tuning Notes for comment...

2002-12-09 Thread Tom Lane
Scott Shattuck [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Robert Treat wrote: I don't think this is entirely true. On tables that have large numbers of inserts, but no updates or deletes, you do not need to run vacuum. In my experience I've seen tables with numerous indexes continue to benefit greatly from

Re: [HACKERS] Sequence Cleanup

2002-12-09 Thread Tom Lane
Rod Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I'd like ALTER SEQUENCE to be transaction safe. I think that's inherently impossible without breaking the existing behavior of setval/nextval, which is something we will not accept. ALTER SEQUENCE would be better thought of as a form of setval with even more

[HACKERS] Yahoo hosting service using MySQL

2002-12-09 Thread Ned Lilly
http://webhosting.yahoo.com/ps/wh/prod/p3.html MySQL® is considered the most popular open source database in the world. Fast and powerful, it is perfect for high-traffic, heavy-load sites. ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 5: Have you checked our

Re: [HACKERS] DB Tuning Notes for comment...

2002-12-09 Thread Scott Shattuck
Tom Lane wrote: Scott Shattuck [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Robert Treat wrote: I don't think this is entirely true. On tables that have large numbers of inserts, but no updates or deletes, you do not need to run vacuum. In my experience I've seen tables with numerous indexes continue to

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] Patch to make Turks happy.

2002-12-09 Thread Bruce Momjian
Thanks. Applied for 7.3.1. --- Peter Eisentraut wrote: Bruce Momjian writes: Peter, is that patch OK for 7.3.1? I am not sure. Definitely. It's a bug fix. -- Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [HACKERS] IPv6 patch rejected

2002-12-09 Thread Bruce Momjian
I didn't read my email this weekend, so I am sorry to be late getting back to you on this. First, let me say I am excited about this patch. Several people have asked for IPv6 support, but you are the first person to actually submit a patch for it. I want to comment on the patch a bit because

Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Global Development Group Announces

2002-12-09 Thread Marc G. Fournier
On Fri, 6 Dec 2002, Thomas O'Connell wrote: I was surprised, for instance, to receive a non-list email announcing the release of the software but then to have to wait for days actually to see it show up on the official (or even the advocacy) website in a news item. Even now it is not listed

Re: [HACKERS] DB Tuning Notes for comment...

2002-12-09 Thread Tom Lane
Scott Shattuck [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Willing to learn here but skipping a vacuum full has caused some issues for us. Here's some data from a recent 3 day test run that was done with regular vacuums but not vacuum fulls. When running with vacuum full the indexes remain in line:

[HACKERS] SIGSEGV

2002-12-09 Thread Patrick Welche
Using cvs source of Dec 4 15:13: test=# \d amount Table public.amount Column | Type | Modifiers +-+ id | integer | not null default

Re: [HACKERS] DB Tuning Notes for comment...

2002-12-09 Thread Philip Warner
At 03:54 PM 9/12/2002 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: However, I suspect that the present FSM code is not very effective at deciding *which* tables to track if it has too few slots, You are definitely right there. I think it would be worth looking at removing max_fsm_tables as a tuning option, and

Re: [HACKERS] DB Tuning Notes for comment...

2002-12-09 Thread Philip Warner
At 02:46 PM 9/12/2002 -0500, Robert Treat wrote: getting this info into the standard documentation and/or Bruce's tuning guide. I'd vote for the standard docs since it is sufficiently basic as to be needed by most users. We either need a tuning chapter or a new section in runtime

Re: [HACKERS] DB Tuning Notes for comment...

2002-12-09 Thread Tom Lane
Philip Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I think it would be worth looking at removing max_fsm_tables as a tuning option, and adding a 'relhasfsm' flag to pg_class for those tables that should not be mapped. Default to 't'. Then, make the table grow dynamically as tables are added, or when a

Re: [HACKERS] SIGSEGV

2002-12-09 Thread Tom Lane
Patrick Welche [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: test=# select value from amount; server closed the connection unexpectedly This is a known bug also (in the domain-constraint patch, which has turned VALUE into a reserved word, a rather unpleasant price to pay for the feature IMHO). Rod claimed his

Re: [HACKERS] SIGSEGV

2002-12-09 Thread Rod Taylor
On Mon, 2002-12-09 at 19:04, Tom Lane wrote: Patrick Welche [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: test=# select value from amount; server closed the connection unexpectedly This is a known bug also (in the domain-constraint patch, which has turned VALUE into a reserved word, a rather unpleasant price

Re: [HACKERS] DB Tuning Notes for comment...

2002-12-09 Thread Philip Warner
At 03:54 PM 9/12/2002 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: FSM entries aren't needed for sequences either, so more correct is select count(*) from pg_class where relkind in ('r', 't'); presumably: select count(*) from pg_class where relkind in ('r', 't', 'i');

Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Global Development Group

2002-12-09 Thread Lamar Owen
On Monday 09 December 2002 12:50, Peter Eisentraut wrote: Compare the 7.3 release notes, written for the most part by Bruce Momjian and revised by a couple of other developers, to the press release, written by people who were obviously ill-informed. If people want to see the details, let them

Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Global Development Group

2002-12-09 Thread Jason Earl
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Robert Treat writes: I think we've already shown why it doesn't hurt to market to the converted. I'll add that if you compare the 7.2 press release with the 7.3 press release, you'll see none of the technical content was removed. Compare the

Re: [HACKERS] more compile warnings

2002-12-09 Thread Bruce Momjian
Tom Lane wrote: Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: You would think that would catch it. My problem is that I am compiling with -O0, because I compile all day and I don't care about optimization. You should reconsider that. At -O0 gcc doesn't do any flow analysis, and thus you lose

Re: [HACKERS] DB Tuning Notes for comment...

2002-12-09 Thread Tom Lane
Philip Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: At 03:54 PM 9/12/2002 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: FSM entries aren't needed for sequences either, so more correct is select count(*) from pg_class where relkind in ('r', 't'); presumably: select count(*) from pg_class where relkind in ('r', 't',

Re: [HACKERS] DB Tuning Notes for comment...

2002-12-09 Thread Philip Warner
At 07:01 PM 9/12/2002 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: We could make the constraint be on total space for relation entries + page entries rather than either individually, but I think that'd mostly make it harder to interpret the config setting rather than offer any real ease of administration. Perhaps

Re: [HACKERS] DB Tuning Notes for comment...

2002-12-09 Thread Philip Warner
At 12:17 PM 10/12/2002 +1100, Philip Warner wrote: Secondly, an empty database contains 98 tables, Corrected based on Tom's later mail; from the FSM PoV, it contains 37 (indices don't count). So it is exhausted when more than two DBs are created.

Re: [HACKERS] DB Tuning Notes for comment...

2002-12-09 Thread Tom Lane
Philip Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Secondly, an empty database contains 98 tables, so the default setting of max_fsm_pages to 100 is way too low. Only 37 of them need FSM entries, but still a good point; we should probably bump it up to 1000 to be more realistic. oddly (bug? edge

Re: [HACKERS] DB Tuning Notes for comment...

2002-12-09 Thread Scott Shattuck
Tom Lane wrote: Scott Shattuck [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Willing to learn here but skipping a vacuum full has caused some issues for us. Here's some data from a recent 3 day test run that was done with regular vacuums but not vacuum fulls. When running with vacuum full the indexes remain in

Re: [HACKERS] DB Tuning Notes for comment...

2002-12-09 Thread Philip Warner
At 08:39 PM 9/12/2002 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: A VACUUM done just after startup does not have any historical info to base this decision on. The actual order is: start delete vacuum; insert - does not use free space vacuum; insert - does not use free space vacuum; vacuum; insert - uses free space

Re: [HACKERS] DB Tuning Notes for comment...

2002-12-09 Thread Robert Treat
On Mon, 09 Dec 2002 19:10:23 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: Philip Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I think it would be worth looking at removing max_fsm_tables as a tuning option, and adding a 'relhasfsm' flag to pg_class for those tables that should not be mapped. Default to 't'. Then, make the

Re: [HACKERS] DB Tuning Notes for comment...

2002-12-09 Thread Philip Warner
At 09:10 PM 9/12/2002 -0500, Robert Treat wrote: Even this little bit would be a step in the right direction. What I would find really useful is a 'VACUUM...WITH HISORY' which wrote the underlying details of VACUUM VERBOSE to a 'pg_vacuum_history' table.

Re: [HACKERS] nested transactions

2002-12-09 Thread Kevin Brown
Bruce Momjian wrote: I am going to work on nested transactions for 7.4. My goal is to first implement nested transactions: BEGIN; SELECT ... BEGIN; UPDATE; COMMIT; DELETE; COMMIT; and later savepoints (Oracle): BEGIN;

Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Global Development Group

2002-12-09 Thread Tom Lane
Jason Earl [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Compare the 7.3 release notes, written for the most part by Bruce Momjian and revised by a couple of other developers, to the press release, written by people who were obviously ill-informed. So does this mean

Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Global Development Group

2002-12-09 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Josh Berkus writes: I can definitely understand someone not wanting to *participate* in marketing/advocacy of PostgreSQL. However, your being opposed to promoting PostgreSQL as an organized activity *at all* baffles me. How can you be against promoting PostgreSQL? I'm not against promoting

Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Global Development Group

2002-12-09 Thread Josh Berkus
Peter, I can definitely understand someone not wanting to *participate* in marketing/advocacy of PostgreSQL. However, your being opposed to promoting PostgreSQL as an organized activity *at all* baffles me. How can you be against promoting PostgreSQL? I'm not against promoting

[HACKERS] psql's \d commands --- end of the line for 1-character identifiers?

2002-12-09 Thread Tom Lane
[ moved to hackers from pgsql-patches ] Christopher Kings-Lynne [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Peter wrote: Christopher Kings-Lynne writes: \dc - list conversions [PATTERN] \dC - list casts What are we going to use for collations? \dn Is the only letter left in collations that hasn't been

Re: [HACKERS] Sequence Cleanup

2002-12-09 Thread Hannu Krosing
Rod Taylor kirjutas T, 10.12.2002 kell 01:49: Below is a short list of TODOs on sequences I wish to tackle over the next week. ... Ok, this is where it gets confusing. Right now setval() is implemented in such a manner that it cannot be rolled back (see SETVAL NOTE below), but I'd like ALTER

Re: [HACKERS] proposal: array utility functions phase 1

2002-12-09 Thread Joe Conway
Tom Lane wrote: This seems fairly unworkable to me as-is. By definition, WHERE selects from a cross-product of the FROM tables; to make the above do what you want, you'd have to break that fundamental semantics. The semantics of explicit JOIN cases would be broken too. What we need is some

[HACKERS] tuple descriptors?

2002-12-09 Thread Nate Sommer
Can anyone tell me how to get a tuple's TupleDesc if all that is known is the tid? Or is there an easy way to step through a tuple, retrieving the data and data type from each field? Thanks, Nate Sommer

Re: [HACKERS] tuple descriptors?

2002-12-09 Thread Tom Lane
Nate Sommer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Can anyone tell me how to get a tuple's TupleDesc if all that is known is t= he tid? Or is there an easy way to step through a tuple, retrieving the da= ta and data type from each field? Tupledescs are generally associated with tables (relations) more

Re: [HACKERS] Let's create a release team

2002-12-09 Thread Dan Langille
On 9 Dec 2002 at 11:38, Tom Lane wrote: Dan Langille [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Let's create a release team. This strategy is one well established in other projects and in industry. For lack of a better starting reference, let me suggest http://www.freebsd.org/releng/charter.html as a

Re: [HACKERS] tuple descriptors?

2002-12-09 Thread Nate Sommer
Can anyone tell me how to get a tuple's TupleDesc if all that is known is t= he tid? Or is there an easy way to step through a tuple, retrieving the da= ta and data type from each field? Tupledescs are generally associated with tables (relations) more easily than with specific tuples.

Re: [HACKERS] psql's \d commands --- end of the line for 1-character identifiers?

2002-12-09 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
... and that was already proposed for show schemas (namespaces). I'm inclined to think it's time to bite the bullet and go over to words rather than single characters to identify the \d target (viz, \dschema, \dcast, etc, presumably with unique abbreviations being allowed, as well as special

Re: [HACKERS] psql's \d commands --- end of the line for

2002-12-09 Thread Hannu Krosing
Tom Lane kirjutas T, 10.12.2002 kell 02:05: [ moved to hackers from pgsql-patches ] Christopher Kings-Lynne [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Peter wrote: Christopher Kings-Lynne writes: \dc - list conversions [PATTERN] \dC - list casts What are we going to use for collations? \dn

Re: [HACKERS] Darwin/Mac OS X Startup Script

2002-12-09 Thread Bruce Momjian
Added to /contrib/start-scripts as: PostgreSQL.darwin StartupParameters.plist.darwin Thanks. --- David Wheeler wrote: All, I've simplified the Darwin/Mac OS X startup script I submitted earlier

Re: [HACKERS] Let's create a release team

2002-12-09 Thread Justin Clift
Hi Dan, It's been mentioned a few times on the Advocacy and Marketing list that we should put together a process for ensuring that all the parts necessary for a release occur properly and smoothly. *** Source code - Initial packaging of the new releases' source code Docs -

Re: [HACKERS] tuple descriptors?

2002-12-09 Thread Tom Lane
Nate Sommer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Tupledescs are generally associated with tables (relations) more easily than with specific tuples. What exactly is your context here? What I'd like to do is add some code to the heap_delete function that checks the tuple being deleted for oids, compares

Re: [HACKERS] Let's create a release team

2002-12-09 Thread Tom Lane
Dan Langille [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Is the process documented? Any set procedure? Who knows how to do it? Er ... nope, nope, the core bunch ... Is 'core' the same as 'steering'? Yes, the webpage takes some license here. 'core' is the most common terminology for the-usual-suspects.

Re: [HACKERS] Let's create a release team

2002-12-09 Thread Bruce Momjian
Tom Lane wrote: as a result of their individual contributions). So ISTM such a reorganization would leave the core committee as a figurehead and make the release team into the effective new core. I thought we were already only figureheads? ;-) -- Bruce Momjian|

Re: [HACKERS] tuple descriptors?

2002-12-09 Thread Tom Lane
Nate Sommer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I'm a student taking a database systems course, and as a project option I chose to work on one of PostgreSQL's todo list items, namely auto-delete large objects when referencing row is deleted. The main point of the project is to become more comfortable

Re: [HACKERS] tuple descriptors?

2002-12-09 Thread Philip Warner
At 01:56 AM 10/12/2002 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: but I'm sure Glenn would be pleased to send 'em to you on request. Do you have an email address - the O'Reilly site also seems not to have one... Philip Warner|

Re: [HACKERS] tuple descriptors?

2002-12-09 Thread Philip Warner
At 01:56 AM 10/12/2002 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: but I'm sure Glenn would be pleased to send 'em to you on request. I've found a link: http://www.delphis.com/java/java.html Philip Warner| __---_

Re: [HACKERS] tuple descriptors?

2002-12-09 Thread Tom Lane
Philip Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: At 01:56 AM 10/12/2002 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: but I'm sure Glenn would be pleased to send 'em to you on request. Do you have an email address - the O'Reilly site also seems not to have one... Hrm, you're right. I think there was one in the hardcopy

Re: [HACKERS] psql's \d commands --- end of the line for

2002-12-09 Thread Tom Lane
Hannu Krosing [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Why not use \D for long ids ? Seems like a fine idea to me. (I had actually started to think of \ssomething for show, but was just observing that that would create conflicts against existing commands, when your message arrived. \Dsomething works though.)

Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Global Development Group Announces

2002-12-09 Thread Marc G. Fournier
On Thu, 5 Dec 2002, Tom Lane wrote: I tend to agree with Peter. Not that we don't need a marketing presence; we do (I think Great Bridge's marketing efforts are sorely missed). But the point he is making is that the pgsql mailing lists go to people who are generally unimpressed by marketing

Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Global Development Group Announces

2002-12-09 Thread Marc G. Fournier
On Sat, 7 Dec 2002, Vince Vielhaber wrote: On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote: Peter Eisentraut wrote: Marc G. Fournier writes: It isn't, but those working on -advocacy were asked to help come up with a stronger release *announcement* then we've had in the past ...

Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Global Development Group

2002-12-09 Thread Marc G. Fournier
s'alright, the 'fiefdoms' are about to be nuked :) On Thu, 5 Dec 2002, Robert Treat wrote: On Thu, 2002-12-05 at 03:28, Dave Page wrote: www is a closed group consisting of a few of us who actually do the work on the sites. This is one of the primary reasons the sites are so fractured.

Re: [HACKERS] psql's \d commands --- end of the line for

2002-12-09 Thread Philip Warner
At 05:13 PM 9/12/2002 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: Seems like a fine idea to me. Ditto. \Dsomething works though.) Any objections out there? My only complaint here is being forced to use the 'shift' key on commands that will be common. I would prefer any other lower case char: \b, \j, \k , \m,

Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Global Development Group

2002-12-09 Thread Justin Clift
Peter Eisentraut wrote: snip Press release: - Supports data in many international characters sets (UNICODE, EUC_JP, EUC_CN, EUC_KR, JOHAB, EUC_TW, ISO 8859-1 ECMA-94, KOI8, WIN1256, etc...) That is just plain wrong. Support for various character sets is years old. Sure is.

Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Global Development Group

2002-12-09 Thread Josh Berkus
Peter, Robert, Jason, Vince, Justin, et al.: First off, I'd like to ask everyone to CUT IT OUT WITH THE $^*^@** FLAMING, ALREADY! People are *attacking* each other instead of disagreeing. Several posters seem to be taking to opportunity to say everything in the most insulting way possible,

Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Global Development Group

2002-12-09 Thread Tom Lane
Josh Berkus [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: First off, I'd like to ask everyone to CUT IT OUT WITH THE $^*^@** FLAMING, ALREADY! People are *attacking* each other instead of disagreeing. Amen. This was first time 'round for the advocacy group, and it's not surprising that there are some things

Re: [HACKERS] psql's \d commands --- end of the line for 1-character

2002-12-09 Thread Bruce Momjian
Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote: We could do DESCRIBE commands as well. Also, what happened to the INFORMATION_SCHEMA proposal? Wasn't Peter E doing something with that? What happened to it? The issue here is what do we do with the existing \d[istvS] behavior (for instance, \dsit means

Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Global Development Group

2002-12-09 Thread Bruce Momjian
Tom Lane wrote: Josh Berkus [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: First off, I'd like to ask everyone to CUT IT OUT WITH THE $^*^@** FLAMING, ALREADY! People are *attacking* each other instead of disagreeing. Amen. This was first time 'round for the advocacy group, and it's not surprising that

Re: [HACKERS] psql's \d commands --- end of the line for

2002-12-09 Thread Philip Warner
At 01:22 PM 9/12/2002 -0800, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote: Hmmm...I'm not certain that the \d commands really NEED to have a logical link to the actual thing you're listing. This is the perspective a person with good memory, unlike me. In find it useful to be able to derive commands from

Re: [HACKERS] nested transactions

2002-12-09 Thread Bruce Momjian
Kevin Brown wrote: My question is: how do you see cursors working with nested transactions? Right now you can't do cursors outside of transactions. Subtransactions would complicate things a bit: BEGIN; DECLARE CURSOR x ... BEGIN (is cursor x visible here? What are the implications of

Re: [HACKERS] psql's \d commands --- end of the line for

2002-12-09 Thread Alvaro Herrera
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 12:55:51PM +1100, Philip Warner wrote: At 01:22 PM 9/12/2002 -0800, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote: Hmmm...I'm not certain that the \d commands really NEED to have a logical link to the actual thing you're listing. This is the perspective a person with good memory,

Re: [HACKERS] psql's \d commands --- end of the line for

2002-12-09 Thread Matthew T. O'Connor
\Dsomething works though.) Any objections out there? My only complaint here is being forced to use the 'shift' key on commands that will be common. \dd perhaps? ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL

Re: [HACKERS] psql's \d commands --- end of the line for

2002-12-09 Thread Philip Warner
At 01:55 AM 10/12/2002 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote: \dtab would show something like \dt [tables]\ds [sequences] \dv [views] ... (the way it's shown now shows what completions are available, but not what they mean. Also, both \d and \D should be shown in any case) This would be OK, but I'd

Re: [HACKERS] psql's \d commands --- end of the line for

2002-12-09 Thread Tom Lane
Philip Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: This would be OK, but I'd be very happy with DESCRIBE, especially if tab-completion meant I could type 'DESCtabTABtabname' instead of 'DESCRIBE TABLE name'. That's quicker than backslashshiftDunshifttspacename ? I don't want to sound like I've got

Re: [HACKERS] [ADMIN] dumpProcLangs(): handler procedure for language

2002-12-09 Thread Daniel Kalchev
I have had similar troubles, related to oid overflow. I had to modify pg_dump to properly cast queries that contain oids. This is against 7.1.3 source. The patch was hacked quickly, in order to get a corrupted database reloaded, and this while I was traveling in another country... so it is far

Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 7.3 Installation on SCO

2002-12-09 Thread Bruce Momjian
It should have worked, but edit Makefile.shlib and remove that offending export from the link line. That may fix it. --- Shibashish wrote: Dear Sir, I use SCO Open Server 5.0.5 on an intel box. Although I have