-Original Message-
From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 20 January 2003 21:28
To: Didier Moens
Cc: Dave Page; PostgreSQL Hackers Mailing List
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Foreign key wierdness
Didier Moens [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I just formally tested on PostgreSQL
I'm not sure how adequately these topics are covered elsewhere, but you
should probably provide at least a pointer if not improved information:
* Should have a mention of the pgcrypto code in contrib.
* Brain hiccup, but isn't there some type of password datatype
* Explanation of
Jan Wieck writes:
I just submitted the patches for the native Win32 port of v7.2.1 on the
patches mailing list.
I'm concerned that you are adding all these *.dsp files for build process
control. This is going to be a burden to maintain. Everytime someone
changes an aspect of how a file is
We've gotten a couple of complaints now about the fact that 7.3 doesn't
include an OID column in a table created via CREATE TABLE AS or SELECT
INTO. Unless I hear objections, I'm going to revert it to including an
OID, and back-patch the fix for 7.3.2 as well. See discussion a couple
days ago on
Christopher Kings-Lynne writes:
I remember a while back you were saying you were working on pg_dump object
ordering? What happened with that? Did you need some help with it?
I don't remember that and I don't have any specific plans relating to
that.
--
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It's all over Slashdot:
http://security.e-matters.de/advisories/012003.html
-Doug
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
(send unregister YourEmailAddressHere to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
On 21 Jan 2003, Doug McNaught wrote:
It's all over Slashdot:
http://security.e-matters.de/advisories/012003.html
That bit about 'This does not apply to :pserver: only' (probably slightly
paraphrased) is very confusing. I gather from later on in the page that it
means that the flaw only
Problem is, nobody builds packages on windows anyway. They just all
download the binary a guy (usually literally one guy) built. So, let's
just make sure that one guy has cygwin loaded on his machine and we'll be
all set. /tougue in cheek
Sorry, couldn't help myself...Seriously, it's a
Mingw and mingw-ported tools ? That's a nice small and cozy unix-like
envoronment on tom of Windows. Add it emacs, and windoww becomes almost
tolerable ...
Emmanuel Charpentier
[ Back to lurking ... ]
Brian Bruns wrote:
Problem is, nobody builds packages on windows anyway. They just all
Emmanuel Charpentier wrote:
Mingw and mingw-ported tools ? That's a nice small and cozy unix-like
envoronment on tom of Windows. Add it emacs, and windoww becomes almost
tolerable ...
How good is the debugging support under mingW? Is it at least comparable
to using gdb under unix? If not,
Rod Taylor writes:
setting privileges on built-in objects... ok
creating information schema... sed: 1: s/^[0-9]*\.[0-9]*\.\([0 ...:
undefined label 'L;s/.*//;q;: L;s/.*\(\)$/\1/'
ok
vacuuming database template1... ok
Fixed. Consider filing a bug report with your operating system.
-Original Message-
From: Jan Wieck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 4:04 PM
To: Emmanuel Charpentier
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [mail] Re: Win32 port patches submitted
Emmanuel Charpentier wrote:
Mingw and mingw-ported tools ?
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I don't see a strong reason not
to stick with good old configure; make; make install. You're already
requiring various Unix-like tools, so you might as well require the full
shell environment.
Indeed. I think the goal here is to have a port that
Tom Lane wrote:
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I don't see a strong reason not
to stick with good old configure; make; make install. You're already
requiring various Unix-like tools, so you might as well require the full
shell environment.
Indeed. I think the goal here
I would back keeping the windows specific files, and if anything moving the
code away from using the UNIX like programs. My reasoning is that the more
unix tools you use for compiling, the less likley you are to attract
existing windows-only developers to work on the code. I see the Win32 patch
On Tue, 21 Jan 2003, Al Sutton wrote:
I would back keeping the windows specific files, and if anything moving the
code away from using the UNIX like programs. My reasoning is that the more
unix tools you use for compiling, the less likley you are to attract
existing windows-only developers
Al Sutton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I would back keeping the windows specific files, and if anything moving the
code away from using the UNIX like programs. My reasoning is that the more
unix tools you use for compiling, the less likley you are to attract
existing windows-only developers to
Tom Lane wrote:
Al Sutton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I would back keeping the windows specific files, and if anything moving the
code away from using the UNIX like programs. My reasoning is that the more
unix tools you use for compiling, the less likley you are to attract
existing
Recommend always running initdb -W and setting all pg_hba entries to md5.
Chris
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Robert Treat
Sent: Tuesday, 21 January 2003 11:17 PM
To: Dan Langille
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [HACKERS]
Why don't you just include them by default, otherwise if WITHOUT OIDS
appears in the CREATE TABLE command, then don't include them ?
Chris
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tom Lane
Sent: Wednesday, 22 January 2003 4:12 AM
To: [EMAIL
Brian Bruns wrote:
Problem is, nobody builds packages on windows anyway. They just all
download the binary a guy (usually literally one guy) built. So, let's
just make sure that one guy has cygwin loaded on his machine and we'll be
all set. /tougue in cheek
Correct.
I wonder why we need
-Original Message-
From: Hans-Jürgen Schönig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 10:54 PM
To: Brian Bruns; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [mail] Re: [HACKERS] Win32 port patches submitted
Brian Bruns wrote:
Problem is, nobody builds packages on windows
Jan Wieck wrote:
Emmanuel Charpentier wrote:
Mingw and mingw-ported tools ? That's a nice small and cozy unix-like
envoronment on tom of Windows. Add it emacs, and windoww becomes almost
tolerable ...
How good is the debugging support under mingW? Is it at least comparable
to using gdb
Dann Corbit wrote:
[ ... ]
GDB works fine. Some of the other tools don't work right (e.g. sed is
broken).
Recent fixes exist, but I didn't check all of them. WorksForMe(TM), but my
projects are *much* simpler ...
Emmanuel Charpentier
---(end of
24 matches
Mail list logo
