On Sat, 25 Jan 2003, Tom Lane wrote:
We'd have to take it on faith that we should replay the visible files
in their name order.
Couldn't you could just put timestamp information at the beginning if
each file, (or perhaps use that of the first transaction), and read the
beginning of each file
Tom Lane wrote:
Kevin Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
One question I have is: in the event of a crash, why not simply replay
all the transactions found in the WAL? Is the startup time of the
database that badly affected if pg_control is ignored?
Interesting thought, indeed. Since we
Warning: pg_connect() unable to connect to PostgreSQL server: FATAL 1:
Sorry, too many clients already in
/usr/local/www/www.postgresql.org/idocs/opendb.php on line 3
Unable to access database
--
Dave Cramer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cramer Consulting
---(end of
Added to TODO:
* Add group object ownership, so groups can rename/drop/grant on objects,
so we can implement roles
---
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Bruce Momjian writes:
I think the one missing item mentioned was for
OK, at your suggestion, IPv6 addresses will appear in pg_hba.conf, even
if we don't support IPv6.
However, the server log messages stating an IPv6 socket was not made is
only printed if the binary supports IPv6. The message seems to be a
compromise between those who wanted a separate IPv6
Neil Conway wrote:
On Thu, 2003-01-16 at 22:47, Justin Clift wrote:
Over the last few days we've had patches submitted for 7.2.3 that
address a couple of things, both the WAL Recovery Bug that Tom has
developed a patch for, and a couple of buffer overflows that have been
widely
Michael Meskes wrote:
On Sun, Jan 19, 2003 at 01:19:03PM -0500, Robert Treat wrote:
pretty wide feature set (as good as any other open source rdbms afaik)
plus it's open source, so if we don't have a feature that say oracle has,
you can pay someone the $10,000+ the oracle license will cost
Looks like you got them all. I assume you got those from gram.y.
---
Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
Hi,
Is this the complete list of constants that must not be quoted?
CURRENT_TIME
CURRENT_TIMESTAMP
CURRENT_DATE
On Saturday 25 January 2003 20:36, Bruce Momjian wrote:
improve the capabilities of the database. For security issues, if we
already have ten open doors in a house, does it help to lock two of them
when the other eight are still open?
Yes. It depends upon which street the door faces. See
Lamar Owen wrote:
On Saturday 25 January 2003 20:36, Bruce Momjian wrote:
improve the capabilities of the database. For security issues, if we
already have ten open doors in a house, does it help to lock two of them
when the other eight are still open?
Yes. It depends upon which street
Hi everyone,
Mark (mlw) put together a PostgreSQL installer for Windows (cygwin
version) a little while ago, but he hasn't been responding to requests
for feedback regarding it (probably busy).
As we're going to be releasing a native Windows version of PostgreSQL
7.4 in a few months, it seems
Robert Treat wrote:
I'm not sure how adequately these topics are covered elsewhere, but you
should probably provide at least a pointer if not improved information:
* Should have a mention of the pgcrypto code in contrib.
* Brain hiccup, but isn't there some type of password datatype
It is
Sorry, I think there was a misunderstanding. What were you looking for?
I used inno setup as well. If you want I can send my install script.
I thought I was being very forth coming.
I even help out on the Windows PG console window.
Justin Clift wrote:
Hi everyone,
Mark (mlw) put together
mlw wrote:
Sorry, I think there was a misunderstanding. What were you looking for?
Sorry Mark, I just thought you were busy.
Was wondering if you were going to make a project of it somewhere, so we
can get things together and have a really decent release for Windows
when 7.4 comes out. :)
Emmanuel Charpentier wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Daniel Kalchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If ever this happens, same should be considered for tables created via the
SELECT INTO statement. These are in many cases 'temporary' in nature and do
not need OIDs (while making much use of the OIDs
On Saturday 25 January 2003 21:06, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Lamar Owen wrote:
On Saturday 25 January 2003 20:36, Bruce Momjian wrote:
improve the capabilities of the database. For security issues, if we
already have ten open doors in a house, does it help to lock two of
them when the
Lamar Owen wrote:
On Saturday 25 January 2003 21:06, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Lamar Owen wrote:
On Saturday 25 January 2003 20:36, Bruce Momjian wrote:
improve the capabilities of the database. For security issues, if we
already have ten open doors in a house, does it help to lock two
I am trying to create a domain with more than one check constraint and
I am getting an error that I don't think is correct according to the
documentation. I am not sure if this is a limitation of a partially
implemented feature or a bug that has so far been overlooked.
For example:
area=# create
They work the same as table constraints with in-line declaration (no
comma).
On Sun, 2003-01-26 at 00:09, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
I am trying to create a domain with more than one check constraint and
I am getting an error that I don't think is correct according to the
documentation. I am not
Tom Lane wrote:
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I don't see a strong reason not
to stick with good old configure; make; make install. You're already
requiring various Unix-like tools, so you might as well require the full
shell environment.
Indeed. I think the goal here is
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So, do we have non-security fixes to warrant a 7.2.X?
There's the order-of-operations-in-checkpoint problem, and there's
one variant of the no one parent tuple was found problem that
should have been patched in 7.2.3, but was overlooked.
Also, the
Josh Berkus [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
How about:
EXPLICIT_JOIN_MINIMUM
and
FROM_COLLAPSE_LIMIT
I've implemented this using FROM_COLLAPSE_LIMIT and JOIN_COLLAPSE_LIMIT
as the variable names. It'd be easy enough to change if someone comes
up with better names. You can read updated
Agreed. How do we get the patches in there, or are they there already?
---
Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So, do we have non-security fixes to warrant a 7.2.X?
There's the
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Agreed. How do we get the patches in there, or are they there already?
We patch ;-). I've been working on it the past few days. Not quite
done, but close.
regards, tom lane
---(end of
24 matches
Mail list logo
