On 22.03.2011 05:39, Vaibhav Kaushal wrote:
You said:
ExecMakeFunctionResultNoSets is used to evaluate function calls.
What are the 'functions' there? Are they the user supplied pl/PGSQL style
user functions, the functions handled by fmgr or are they just another C
function which make the
On 22.03.2011 01:06, Tom Lane wrote:
Heikki Linnakangasheikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com writes:
Any objections to the 2nd attached patch, which adds the mapping of
those locale names on Windows?
I think the added initdb message isn't following our style guidelines
--- it certainly doesn't
On sön, 2011-03-20 at 20:26 +0100, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
A rowtype has an order, determined by the fields within it. Those
fields may be strings and so may have a collation. Doesn't seem
particularly magical to me.
Yeah, that's answer #4. The composite types themselves are not
Thanks Heikki, Tom Robert for your valuable inputs.
According to the code, PG is behaving what is mentioned below.
1. Format = Y
0 ... 9 = 2000 ... 2009 (we are always adding 2000 to the year)
2. Format = YY
00 ... 69 = 2000 ... 2069 (we are adding 2000 to the year)
70 ... 99 = 1970 ... 1999
Hi, hackers.
I am interested in this discussion!
So I surveyed current buffer algorithms around other software. I share about it.
(sorry, it is easy survey..)
CLOCK-PRO and LIRS are popular in current buffer algorithms in my easy survey.
Their algorithms are same author that is Song Jiang.
Hello,
I have several software products which use PostgreSQL as a data repository
and embed the same PostgreSQL binaries. Currently, those software support
Linux. I'm trying to port them to Windows.
I've encountered one problem on Windows. I need to support running all of my
products on one
On 03/22/2011 08:22 AM, MauMau wrote:
Hello,
I have several software products which use PostgreSQL as a data
repository and embed the same PostgreSQL binaries. Currently, those
software support Linux. I'm trying to port them to Windows.
I've encountered one problem on Windows. I need to
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
MauMau maumau...@gmail.com writes:
I've encountered one problem on Windows. I need to support running all of my
products on one host simultaneously. Plus, I need to log messages in
syslog/event log. On Linux, I can distinguish the messages of one product
and those of other products by
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 9:19 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 11:14 AM, Kevin Grittner
kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov wrote:
Maybe the thing to focus on first is the oft-discussed benchmark
farm (similar to the build farm), with a good mix of loads, so
that
Em 21-03-2011 06:26, _ʯͷ escreveu:
I've tried to find when and where do PG invoke PLs module,but
failed.There are four procedures for a query string--parer, rewrite,plan
and execute. I want to know which part invoke the PLs module,and which
function is the entry to do that.
Look at src/pl/foo
I'm sorry that I've mistakenly sent an empty mail. This is the intended
mail.
Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net wrote in message
news:4d889879.3080...@dunslane.net...
On 03/22/2011 08:22 AM, MauMau wrote:
I would appreciate your opinions and advice. I'll try making the patch
while I'm
On 03/22/2011 11:35 AM, MauMau wrote:
I'm sorry that I've mistakenly sent an empty mail. This is the
intended mail.
Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net wrote in message
news:4d889879.3080...@dunslane.net...
On 03/22/2011 08:22 AM, MauMau wrote:
I would appreciate your opinions and advice.
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 8:14 AM, Kevin Grittner
kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov wrote:
rsmogura rsmog...@softperience.eu wrote:
Yes, there is some change, and I looked at this more carefully, as
my performance results wasn't such as I expected. I found PG uses
BufferAccessStrategy to do sequence
2011/3/22 Greg Stark gsst...@mit.edu:
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 6:08 PM, Jim Nasby j...@nasby.net wrote:
Has anyone looked at the overhead of measuring how long IO requests to the
kernel take? If we did that not only could we get an idea of what our IO
workload looked like, we could also
2011/3/22 David Fetter da...@fetter.org:
+1 for fixing this behavior in 9.1. -1 for changing in 9.0, as the
change in behavior mid-release will cause more confusion than the
incomplete accounting does.
Idem.
Cheers,
David.
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 06:44:51PM +0100, Bernd Helmle wrote:
On 03/22/2011 12:47 PM, Jeff Janes wrote:
Maybe the thing to focus on first is the oft-discussed benchmark
farm (similar to the build farm), with a good mix of loads, so
that the impact of changes can be better tracked for multiple
workloads on a variety of platforms and configurations.
Nikhil Sontakke nikhil.sonta...@enterprisedb.com writes:
It looked familiar, so I dug up the archives and found that Tom had
committed a fix for a similar deadlock via git commitid: 715120e7
However this current deadlock involved an index with oid 2663, which
is ClassNameNspIndexId. Clearly
Patch applied, thanks!
Thanks Tom!
Regards,
Nikhils
On 2011-03-21 23:58, Yeb Havinga wrote:
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 7:51 PM, Yeb Havinga yebhavi...@gmail.com
mailto:yebhavi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2011-03-21 18:04, Robert Haas wrote:
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 12:29 PM, Yeb
Havingayebhavi...@gmail.com
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 3:25 PM, Yeb Havinga yebhavi...@gmail.com wrote:
So the patch eats 4,5% from git master's syncrep performance in my setup.
Don't know how to measure it better than that.
That's quite surprising, but I guess the way forward is clear: don't
apply that patch.
--
Robert
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 11:24 AM, Jeff Janes jeff.ja...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 9:19 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 11:14 AM, Kevin Grittner
kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov wrote:
Maybe the thing to focus on first is the oft-discussed
On Tue, 2011-03-22 at 15:53 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
To be honest, I'm mostly just reporting what I've heard Greg Smith say
on this topic. I don't have any machine with that kind of RAM.
I thought we had a machine for hackers who want to do performance
testing. Mark?
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Radek,
I have implemented initial concept of 2nd level cache. Idea is to keep some
segments of shared memory for special buffers (e.g. indices) to prevent
overwrite those by other operations. I added those functionality to nbtree
index scan.
The problem with any special buffering of database
Robert,
Should I write the announcement for this, or do you want to?
--
-- Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://www.pgexperts.com
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list
Andres Freund and...@anarazel.de writes:
On Saturday 05 March 2011 17:46:13 Tom Lane wrote:
Andres Freund and...@anarazel.de writes:
* Collation-related regression failure on buildfarm member pika. This
is clearly a bug we need to identify, but maybe we can ship the alpha
without a fix ---
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 3:41 PM, Markus Wanner mar...@bluegap.ch wrote:
On 03/18/2011 08:29 PM, Simon Riggs wrote:
We could do that easily enough, actually, if we wished.
Do we wish?
I personally don't see any problem letting a standby show a snapshot
before the master. I'd consider it
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 11:04 PM, Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com wrote:
Should I write the announcement for this, or do you want to?
For alpha4? I'd be happy for you to do it, but it's a bit out of date
now. I was thinking to bundle alpha5 on Monday; maybe we should just
wait and announce that
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 10:00 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
2011/3/15 Devrim GÜNDÜZ dev...@gunduz.org:
If you need more votes for this: +1 from me. I'd like to wrap the
packages before I leave for PGEast.
My only hesitation about this is
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 5:08 PM, Aidan Van Dyk ai...@highrise.ca wrote:
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 3:41 PM, Markus Wanner mar...@bluegap.ch wrote:
On 03/18/2011 08:29 PM, Simon Riggs wrote:
We could do that easily enough, actually, if we wished.
Do we wish?
I personally don't see any problem
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 11:25 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
As far as I can tell, there are basically two viable solutions on the
table here.
1. Every time we observe a page as all-visible, (a) set the
PD_ALL_VISIBLE bit on the page, without bumping the LSN; (b) set the
bit in
Merlin Moncure mmonc...@gmail.com Monday 21 March 2011 20:58:16
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 2:08 PM, Greg Stark gsst...@mit.edu wrote:
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Merlin Moncure mmonc...@gmail.com
wrote:
Can't you make just one large mapping and lock it in 8k regions? I
thought the
Greetings,
ADJ Dashboard project small description is written
https://github.com/hzroot/ADJ-Dashboard/wiki here. If you give suggestions
(what you need as a dba? or what you use most? etc.. ), it will be great!
22 Mart 2011 03:51 tarihinde Devrim GÜNDÜZ dev...@gunduz.org yazdı:
On Mon,
I'm sorry that I've mistakenly sent an empty mail. This is the intended
mail.
Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net wrote in message
news:4d889879.3080...@dunslane.net...
On 03/22/2011 08:22 AM, MauMau wrote:
I would appreciate your opinions and advice. I'll try making the patch
while I'm
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 10:00 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
FWIW, collations are probably still several days away from being
noticeably less broken than they were in alpha4.
How much less broken are they now?
I think the core code is only
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 7:58 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Throw error for indeterminate collation of an ORDER/GROUP/DISTINCT target.
hmm. In the current arrangement = doesn't depend on collation, right?
So in an ideal world we could use any collation we want to implement
Greg Stark gsst...@mit.edu writes:
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 7:58 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Throw error for indeterminate collation of an ORDER/GROUP/DISTINCT target.
hmm. In the current arrangement = doesn't depend on collation, right?
I've been trying to get rid of that
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 4:28 PM, Radosław Smogura
rsmog...@softperience.eu wrote:
Merlin Moncure mmonc...@gmail.com Monday 21 March 2011 20:58:16
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 2:08 PM, Greg Stark gsst...@mit.edu wrote:
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Merlin Moncure mmonc...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
While working on adding support for SQL/Med objects to pgAdmin, I'm
quite surprised to see there is no way to add comments to SQL/Med
objects. Is this on purpose or is it just something that was simply missed?
Thanks.
--
Guillaume
http://www.postgresql.fr
http://dalibo.com
--
Sent via
Can anyone help me, i am trying to carry out an investigation
which involves accessing dead tuples within the postgresql.
I have been advised i could write a script that allows me to
examine dead tuples and am seeking advise on how to achieve this,
or pointers that can help me going in the right
Can anyone help me, i am trying to carry out an investigation
which involves accessing dead tuples within the postgresql.
I have been advised i could write a script that allows me to
examine dead tuples and am seeking advise on how to achieve this,
or pointers that can help me going in the right
I took a crack at implementing the first approach described above,
which seems to be by far the simplest idea we've come up with to date.
Patch attached. It doesn't seem to be that complicated, which could
mean either that it's not that complicated or that I'm missing
something. Feel free
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 11:59 PM, Gokulakannan Somasundaram
gokul...@gmail.com wrote:
I took a crack at implementing the first approach described above,
which seems to be by far the simplest idea we've come up with to date.
Patch attached. It doesn't seem to be that complicated, which could
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 1:19 PM, Erik Rijkers e...@xs4all.nl wrote:
This is OK and expected. But then it continues (in the logfile) with:
FATAL: lock file postmaster.pid already exists
HINT: Is another postmaster
44 matches
Mail list logo
