On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 3:37 PM, Haribabu kommi
haribabu.ko...@huawei.com wrote:
On 12 October 2013 11:30 Tom Lane wrote:
Haribabu kommi haribabu.ko...@huawei.com writes:
To handle the above case instead of directly resetting the dead tuples
as zero, how if the exact dead tuples are removed
On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 05:11:55PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
I am in Moscow with Alexander and we were discussing GIN pg_upgrade
issues. One option we have already discussed was to take the old GIN
index code and put it in a separate directory, and call the new GIN
index something
Hi,
2013-10-19 17:20 keltezéssel, David Fetter írta:
Thanks very much to Mike Blackwell and Craig Kerstiens for their
persistence through what most people would consider a tedious and
thankless task. Thanks also to the patch submitters, reviewers and
other participants.
That the formal
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 2:22 AM, Peter Geoghegan p...@heroku.com wrote:
There has recently been considerable discussion around auto-tuning.
Throughout the course of this discussion, I raised the idea of
creating a new GUC to separately control autovacuum's usage of
maintenance_work_mem [1],
On 15-10-2013 14:34, Josh Berkus wrote:
On 10/15/2013 07:36 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com
wrote:
Josh said we should treat replication connections in a separate pool
from normal database connections, right? So you withdraw your
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 10:42:10AM +0200, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
Hi,
2013-10-19 17:20 keltezéssel, David Fetter írta:
Thanks very much to Mike Blackwell and Craig Kerstiens for their
persistence through what most people would consider a tedious and
thankless task. Thanks also to the
Noah Misch n...@leadboat.com writes:
wrapper function. A backend change that would help here is to extend event
triggers to cover the CLUSTER command, permitting you to inject monitoring
after plain CLUSTER and dispense with the wrapper.
I didn't look in any level of details, but it might be
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 01:06:15PM +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
On 12.08.2013 21:08, Pavel Stehule wrote:
2013/8/10 Tom Lanet...@sss.pgh.pa.us:
Pavel Stehulepavel.steh...@gmail.com writes:
I found so there are no simple API for working with LO from PL without
access to file system.
Hi,
I ran into some pretty strange behavior of C-language function and
default parameter values, both on 9.2 and 9.4devel. Consider for example
this trivial C function:
Datum
show_bug(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) {
elog(WARNING, called ;-));
PG_RETURN_VOID();
}
which is
On 21.10.2013 02:38, Tomas Vondra wrote:
Hi,
I ran into some pretty strange behavior of C-language function and
default parameter values, both on 9.2 and 9.4devel. Consider for example
this trivial C function:
Datum
show_bug(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) {
elog(WARNING, called ;-));
On 10/20/2013 08:38 PM, Tomas Vondra wrote:
Hi,
I ran into some pretty strange behavior of C-language function and
default parameter values, both on 9.2 and 9.4devel. Consider for example
this trivial C function:
Datum
show_bug(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) {
elog(WARNING, called ;-));
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 12:10:17AM +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
On 2013-10-17 18:04:34 -0400, Noah Misch wrote:
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 08:27:01PM +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
On 2013-10-17 12:33:45 -0400, Noah Misch wrote:
1. Is there any guarantee that sizeof(intptr_t) = sizeof(size_t)?
Hi, I've been using postgres for many years but never took the time to play
with the code until now. As a learning experience i came up with this WIP
patch to keep track of the # of bytes sent and received by the server over
it's communication sockets. Counters are kept per database, per
On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 01:56:23PM -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On Fri, 2013-10-18 at 18:46 -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
As to your point about not wanting to do it for a single image- it seems
we could potentially say that for every individual image proposed, but
if we don't keep track of
2013/10/21 Noah Misch n...@leadboat.com
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 01:06:15PM +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
On 12.08.2013 21:08, Pavel Stehule wrote:
2013/8/10 Tom Lanet...@sss.pgh.pa.us:
Pavel Stehulepavel.steh...@gmail.com writes:
I found so there are no simple API for working with LO
On 20 October 2013 12:06 Amit Kapila wrote:
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 3:37 PM, Haribabu kommi haribabu.ko...@huawei.com
wrote:
On 12 October 2013 11:30 Tom Lane wrote:
Haribabu kommi haribabu.ko...@huawei.com writes:
To handle the above case instead of directly resetting the dead
tuples as
On 2013-10-20 08:12:37 -0700, David Fetter wrote:
what will happen to patches left in pending state in the 2013-09 CF?
I have moved them to the next CF. This does not mean that they are
abandoned until then. I strongly suspect that people will be
reviewing and committing many of them
17 matches
Mail list logo
