* Ian Lance Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010326 01:14]:
Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Larry Rosenman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/home/ler/pg-dev/pgsql/doc/src/sgml'
cd sgml tar -cf ../programmer.tar --exclude=Makefile
--exclude='*.sgml' --exclude=ref
Hi,
There's no bug with regexp, because "*" operator in
regex match zero or more times. So if you want
match exactly your patern try ~ 'ibd01.*' . "." match an
arbitrary character.
Cheers,
PEJAC Pascal
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: Have you
"Rainer Mager" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
We're using PG 7.0 and 7.1beta and are having dead lock problems. The docs
say the Postgres detects dead locks and automatically rolls back 1
transaction to recover but this is not our experience. Are the docs
incorrect or is this more serious?
Which
PostgreSQL typically uses port 5432 for client-server communications.
It would be a good idea to register this with IANA. This will help to
avoid a clash with other services that might try to use the port.
DB2, Interbase, MS SQL, MySQL, Oracle, Sybase, etc. are already
registered.
Might someone
Suddenly I obtain access to
ULTRIX black 4.3 1 RISC
Uh ... what kind of processor is that? Offhand I don't see any
indication that any of the entries in s_lock.h are supposed to work
for Ultrix.
As mentioned earlier, Ultrix on RISC means that it is a MIPS processor.
DEC implemented
The list of unreported or "in progress" platforms has gotten much
shorter. If anyone can help on the remaining problems, we'll be able to
move closer to release status, which is A Good Thing (tm) ;)
btw, if we get most of these qualified, we will be on around 30
platforms
I posted this to the list a few days ago, but it was not addressed. Can
someone please make the changes to the src/test/regress/resultmap?
Thanks.
- brandon
b. palmer, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgp: www.crimelabs.net/bpalmer.pgp5
*** resultmap.orig Fri Mar 23 12:34:56 2001
---
Applied. I thought there was some openbsd confusion results so I
ignored the previous patch.
I posted this to the list a few days ago, but it was not addressed. Can
someone please make the changes to the src/test/regress/resultmap?
Thanks.
- brandon
b. palmer, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thomas Lockhart writes:
SCO OpenServer 5 x86 7.1 2001-03-13, Billy Allie
Where did you see this? I don't find it in the archives or in Vince's
database.
--
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://yi.org/peter-e/
---(end of
SCO OpenServer 5 x86 7.1 2001-03-13, Billy Allie
Where did you see this? I don't find it in the archives or in Vince's
database.
In FAQ_SCO. I was looking to try to figure out what the differences were
between the SCO products :)
- Thomas
Since the SCO UDK works on both UnixWare and OpenServer, I think we are
pretty safe. Also, there was a post to -HACKERS about the accept bug and
we changed the workaround to include OSR5.
I'd leave it until disproved. I don't have a OSR5 installation to check
it with, however.
LER
Thomas Lockhart [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Linux 2.2.18 PPC750 7.1 2001-03-19, Tom Lane
"PPC750"? What's that? "PPC G3" might be more likely to mean something
to onlookers ...
regards, tom lane
---(end of broadcast)---
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Applied. I thought there was some openbsd confusion results so I
ignored the previous patch.
Yeah, I thought there was still some debate about whether we knew the
correct resultmap for *bsd or not ...
regards, tom lane
Thomas Lockhart [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As mentioned earlier, Ultrix on RISC means that it is a MIPS processor.
I suspect that some one of the implementations in s_lock.h was intended
to be usable on Ultrix, and we've somehow dropped the declarations
needed to make it go. You might want
Thomas Lockhart writes:
SCO OpenServer 5 x86 7.1 2001-03-13, Billy Allie
Where did you see this? I don't find it in the archives or in Vince's
database.
In FAQ_SCO. I was looking to try to figure out what the differences were
between the SCO products :)
I wouldn't necessarily count
Hi,
I know I'm a bit early to submit stuff for 7.2, but attached is a patch
(agains 7.1RC1) to add uint2 and uint4 as new types. I haven't put in
all the possible combinations of signed and unsigned ints as arguments
to operators -- I was going insane just doing it for all combinations
"PPC750"? What's that? "PPC G3" might be more likely to mean something
to onlookers ...
Actually "G3" means nothing outside of Apple afaict. The 750 series is a
follow-on to the 60x series, and there is a 7xxx series also. From my
pov, using an accepted label, rather than a marketing
SCO OpenServer 5 x86 7.1 2001-03-13, Billy Allie
Where did you see this? I don't find it in the archives or in Vince's
database.
In FAQ_SCO. I was looking to try to figure out what the differences were
between the SCO products :)
I wouldn't necessarily count something dated Oct
I would.
LER
--
Larry Rosenman
http://www.lerctr.org/~ler/
Phone: +1 972 414 9812
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX
Karl DeBisschop [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In my tests on sparc/7 my compile died at line 3088 of
postgresql-7.1beta6/src/interfaces/python/pgmodule.c:
./pgmodule.c:3088: parse error before `init_pg'
That's line 3137 of today's (22Mar) snapshot, which reads:
/* Initialization function for
Thomas Lockhart wrote:
Linux 2.2.x Alpha 7.1 2001-01-23, Ryan Kirkpatrick
Linux 2.2.x armv4l 7.1 2001-03-22, Mark Knox
Linux 2.2.18 PPC750 7.1 2001-03-19, Tom Lane
Linux 2.2.x S/390 7.1 2000-11-17, Neale Ferguson
Linux 2.2.15 Sparc 7.1 2001-01-30, Ryan Kirkpatrick
Linux 2.2.16 x86 7.1
Lamar Owen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thomas Lockhart wrote:
Linux 2.2.x Alpha 7.1 2001-01-23, Ryan Kirkpatrick
Linux 2.2.x armv4l 7.1 2001-03-22, Mark Knox
Linux 2.2.18 PPC750 7.1 2001-03-19, Tom Lane
Linux 2.2.x S/390 7.1 2000-11-17, Neale Ferguson
Linux 2.2.15 Sparc 7.1
Trond Eivind Glomsrd wrote:
Lamar Owen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Did you get the message from Trond about Linux 2.4 x86? I can also
verify all tests passed on a RedHat Public Beta installation with kernel
2.4.
I haven't put those in the list yet... I'll wait until we release a
NetBSD m68k7.0 2000-04-10, Henry B. Hotz
I no longer have a 68k machine that's fast enough to reasonably test
PG on. I have a IIcx that sometimes serves as a router, but I'm
using some second-generation powermac's mostly now. (You still have
that Centris in your closet Tom?)
Oof.
I know that Sourceforge has been adding all sorts of machines to their
compile farm.
Maybe it would be worthwhile taking a look if they have platforms we
don't?
Regards and best wishes,
Justin Clift
Thomas Lockhart wrote:
The non-test-and-set case should work again in current CVS, and I'd
On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 12:01:24PM +1000, Justin Clift allegedly wrote:
I know that Sourceforge has been adding all sorts of machines to their
compile farm.
Maybe it would be worthwhile taking a look if they have platforms we
don't?
Regards and best wishes,
Justin Clift
Compaq also
On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 07:09:38PM -0500, Tom Lane allegedly wrote:
Thomas Lockhart [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
That is not already available from the Irix support code?
What we have for IRIX is
#if defined(__sgi)
/*
* SGI IRIX 5
* slock_t is defined as a unsigned long. We use the
At 7:53 PM -0500 3/26/01, Tom Lane wrote:
Thomas Lockhart [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
"PPC750"? What's that? "PPC G3" might be more likely to mean something
to onlookers ...
Actually "G3" means nothing outside of Apple afaict. The 750 series is a
follow-on to the 60x series, and there is a
Mathijs Brands [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Notice the single underscore before volatile.
That's definitely wrong --- fixed.
Fixing this causes
as (the SGI version, not GNU as) to choke on the '.global tas' statement.
s_lock.c: At top level:
s_lock.c:234: warning: `tas_dummy' defined but not
Do you know whether anyone uses the GNU assembler on this platform,
or is it always SGI's? I'm wondering if we need two versions of the
assembly code ...
Sure. Both compilers are available, with SGI's, uh, unique approach, and
with GNU's well understood assembler.
I had missed the fact
On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 07:09:38PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
Thomas Lockhart [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
That is not already available from the Irix support code?
What we have for IRIX is
...
Doesn't look to me like it's likely to work on anything but IRIX ...
I have attached
Hi there,
I just run 'make check' on RC1 and got the output below. I've read about
the negative zeros, but I haven't seen someone reporting a failure during
the random test, so I thought it would be good to report this one.
If you need additional information, please contact me.
Regards,
Hi there.
I was just looking for the CVS tags for downloading the beta6 and the
RC1 of 7.1 but there are only the following tags:
REL_7_1_BETA2
REL_7_1_BETA3
REL_7_1
Aren't there tags for the versions I am looking for?
Regards,
Matthias
---(end of
Thomas Lockhart [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
NetBSD Sparc 7.0 2000-04-13, Tom I. Helbekkmo
Fetching the latest source kit now -- hope to have regression tests
run and a report back to you within a day or two.
We need some NetBSD folks to speak up!
I've once again got a VAX that should be
"Mark Knox" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 25 Mar 2001, at 16:07, Tom Lane wrote:
Does that database have any user-created relations in it, or is it
just a virgin database?
Totally virgin. I created it just for that select you wanted.
Okay. Would you create a couple of random tables in it
could anyone compress Postgresql package in bzip2 format?
I am behind a slow line, to save me some bandwith, I would like
to download a package named postgresql-7.1RC1.tar.bz2 .
Regards,
XuYifeng
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: Have you
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Nathan Myers) writes:
Since the actual instruction sequence is probably lifted from the
MIPS manual, it's probably much freer than GPL. For the paranoid,
the actual instructions, extracted, are just
1:
ll %0,%3
bnez %0,2f
li %1,1
sc
37 matches
Mail list logo
