Re: [HACKERS] Hmmm ... isn't count_nondeletable_pages all wet?

2007-09-16 Thread Gregory Stark
Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: It's a corner case, but I say it's a must-fix. Of course Those bug reports have been bothering me for most of a year ... Are there any other outstanding reports like that? -- Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

Re: [HACKERS] Hmmm ... isn't count_nondeletable_pages all wet?

2007-09-16 Thread Tom Lane
Gregory Stark [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Those bug reports have been bothering me for most of a year ... Are there any other outstanding reports like that? Couldn't say. Those two were on my mind because the reporters had allowed me to troll through their

Re: [HACKERS] Hmmm ... isn't count_nondeletable_pages all wet?

2007-09-16 Thread Pavan Deolasee
On 9/16/07, Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Couldn't say. Those two were on my mind because the reporters had allowed me to troll through their table and index files and verify that there were indeed multiple index pointers to the same table row, and yet the index itself did not show any

Re: [HACKERS] What is happening on buildfarm member dugong

2007-09-16 Thread Tom Lane
Teodor Sigaev [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: It seems to me last run (http://pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=dugongdt=2007-09-11%2016:05:01) points to problem with hash implementation. SELECT to_tsvector('thesaurus_tst', 'one postgres one two one two three one'); + NOTICE:

Re: [HACKERS] What is happening on buildfarm member dugong

2007-09-16 Thread Stefan Kaltenbrunner
Tom Lane wrote: Teodor Sigaev [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: It seems to me last run (http://pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=dugongdt=2007-09-11%2016:05:01) points to problem with hash implementation. SELECT to_tsvector('thesaurus_tst', 'one postgres one two one two three one');

Re: [HACKERS] What is happening on buildfarm member dugong

2007-09-16 Thread Gregory Stark
Stefan Kaltenbrunner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Tom Lane wrote: Teodor Sigaev [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: It seems to me last run (http://pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=dugongdt=2007-09-11%2016:05:01) points to problem with hash implementation. SELECT

Re: [HACKERS] invalidly encoded strings

2007-09-16 Thread Andrew Dunstan
Tom Lane wrote: What I think we'd need to have a complete solution is convert(text, name) returns bytea -- convert from DB encoding to arbitrary encoding convert(bytea, name, name) returns bytea -- convert between any two encodings convert(bytea, name) returns text

Re: [HACKERS] invalidly encoded strings

2007-09-16 Thread Tom Lane
Andrew Dunstan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Tom Lane wrote: What I think we'd need to have a complete solution is convert(text, name) returns bytea -- convert from DB encoding to arbitrary encoding convert(bytea, name, name) returns bytea -- convert between any two encodings