Hello
2013/7/1 ian link i...@ilink.io:
Not sure about all of your suggestions. Let me see if I can clarify what
you're looking for.
* simply decision if content should be stored in history or not,
Do you mean that the user should use a flag to place the result of a query
into the
On 07/01/2013 07:53 AM, Claudio Freire wrote:
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 2:29 AM, james ja...@mansionfamily.plus.com wrote:
On 01/07/2013 02:43, Claudio Freire wrote:
In essence, you'd have to use another implementation. CPython guys
have left it very clear they don't intend to fix that, as they
On 1 July 2013 03:07, Nicholas White n.j.wh...@gmail.com wrote:
Alternatively, it might be trivial to make all aggregate functions work
with ignore nulls in a window context
This is a good idea, but I'd like to keep the scope of this patch limited
for the time being
Agreed.
- I'll look at
Definitely not this week. Hopefully for next commit fest.
On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 9:56 PM, Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com wrote:
On 06/30/2013 08:54 PM, ian link wrote:
I found some time and I think I am up to speed now. I finally figured out
how to add new operator strategies and made a
Hi,
I'm looking into this patch as a reviewer.
(2013/05/24 10:33), Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
On 23.05.2013 19:10, Greg Smith wrote:
On 5/20/13 7:51 AM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
It strikes me as kind of weird that the read side and write side are
not more symmetrical.
It might seem weird if
but maybe some interactive mode should be usefull - so after
execution, and showing result, will be prompt if result should be
saved or not.
I like the idea, in addition to the ordinary mode. Personally, I would use
the ordinary mode, but I can see how 'interactive' would be useful.
yes,
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 6:16 AM, David Fetter da...@fetter.org wrote:
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 01:28:35PM -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On 6/28/13 11:30 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 10:31 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
David Fetter da...@fetter.org writes:
On 2013-06-30 22:43:52 -0300, Claudio Freire wrote:
Not only that, the CPython interpreter is rather fuzzy about the
division between interpreters. You can initialize multiple
interpreters, but they share a lot of state, so you can never fully
separate them. You'd have some state from the
Hello
2013/6/29 Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com:
Hello
long time I am thinking about simple function for creating date or
timestamp values based on numeric types without necessity to create
format string.
some like ansi_date(year, month, day) and ansi_timestamp(year, month,
day,
On 26.06.2013 16:37, Amit Kapila wrote:
On Wednesday, June 26, 2013 2:15 AM Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
Can you also try the attached patch, please? It's the same as before,
but in this version, I didn't replace the prev and next pointers in
PGLZ_HistEntry struct with int16s. That avoids some
I'm not really bought into some of the ideas.
but maybe some interactive mode should be usefull - so after
execution, and showing result, will be prompt if result should be
saved or not.
I like the idea, in addition to the ordinary mode. Personally, I would use
the ordinary mode, but I can
2013/7/1 Maciej Gajewski maciej.gajews...@gmail.com:
I'm not really bought into some of the ideas.
but maybe some interactive mode should be usefull - so after
execution, and showing result, will be prompt if result should be
saved or not.
I like the idea, in addition to the ordinary mode.
Le samedi 29 juin 2013 22:00:34, Josh Berkus a écrit :
On 06/29/2013 11:42 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
I think we can survive for now without an additional tool. What I did
was a proof of concept, it was not intended as a suggestion that we
should install prep_buildtree. I am only suggesting
(2013/06/28 3:17), Fabien COELHO wrote:
Attached is patch version 5.
It includes this solution for fork emulation, one report per thread instead of a
global report. Some code duplication for that.
It's good coding. I test configure option with --disable-thread-safety and not.
My test results
On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 3:09 PM, Heikki Linnakangas hlinnakan...@vmware.com
wrote:
On 25.06.2013 21:18, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 7:31 PM, Heikki Linnakangashlinnakangas@**
vmware.com hlinnakan...@vmware.com
wrote:
In summary: The test case you presented as
On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 2:50 PM, Heikki Linnakangas hlinnakan...@vmware.com
wrote:
On 29.06.2013 20:08, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
On 29.06.2013 11:56, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
I made one significant change: I removed the 'freespace' field you added
to GinpageOpaque. Instead, on data leaf
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 6:20 PM, Antonin Houska antonin.hou...@gmail.comwrote:
On 06/25/2013 12:03 AM, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
New revision of patch is attached. Now it includes some docs.
Hi,
I was curious about the new layout of the data page, so I spent a while
looking into the
Dear Mitsumasa,
I have small comments. I think that 'lat' is not generally abbreviation
of 'latency'. But I don't know good abbreviation. If you have any good
abbreviation, please send us revise version.
I needed something short, because I may add a lag time as well under
throttling. No
When I tested this feature, I had 30 caches per 5 minutes, and only a
few from these queries had a sense. Switch between off and on is not
user friendly. I believe so there can be other solution than mine, but
a possibility to friendly clean unwanted caches is necessary.
If you know that
2013/7/1 Maciej Gajewski maciej.gajews...@gmail.com:
When I tested this feature, I had 30 caches per 5 minutes, and only a
few from these queries had a sense. Switch between off and on is not
user friendly. I believe so there can be other solution than mine, but
a possibility to friendly
Hi, Febien
Thanks for your fast response and fix! I set your patch ready for commiter now.
(2013/07/01 19:49), Fabien COELHO wrote:
I have small comments. I think that 'lat' is not generally abbreviation of
'latency'. But I don't know good abbreviation. If you have any good
abbreviation,
On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 10:07 PM, Nicholas White n.j.wh...@gmail.com wrote:
I've attached another iteration of the patch that fixes the multiple-window
bug and adds ( uses) a function to create a Bitmapset using a custom
allocator. I don't think there's any outstanding problems with it now.
I
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 1:49 PM, Albe Laurenz laurenz.a...@wien.gv.at wrote:
This is a review of the patch in 5192d7d2.8020...@catalyst.net.nz
The patch applies cleanly (with the exception of catversion.h of course),
compiles without warnings and passes the regression tests.
It contains
On 1 July 2013 03:07, Nicholas White n.j.wh...@gmail.com wrote:
I've attached another iteration of the patch that fixes the multiple-window
bug and adds ( uses) a function to create a Bitmapset using a custom
allocator. I don't think there's any outstanding problems with it now.
I just
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 10:39 AM, Albe Laurenz laurenz.a...@wien.gv.at wrote:
I found a small bug in the implementation of LDAP connection
parameter lookup.
As documented in
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/libpq-ldap.html
processing should continue after a failed attempt
to
On 7/1/13 7:58 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
I also tried to fix the problem mentioned in
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA+TgmoYnj=Es3L_0Q8+ijR4tVhvztW1fb=7c9k9gemzwqhp...@mail.gmail.com
that we use deprecated OpenLDAP functions, see the attached
ldap-undeprecate.patch.
I added a
Magnus Hagander wrote:
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 1:49 PM, Albe Laurenz laurenz.a...@wien.gv.at wrote:
This is a review of the patch in 5192d7d2.8020...@catalyst.net.nz
The patch applies cleanly (with the exception of catversion.h of course),
compiles without warnings and passes the regression
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 2:48 PM, Albe Laurenz laurenz.a...@wien.gv.at wrote:
Magnus Hagander wrote:
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 1:49 PM, Albe Laurenz laurenz.a...@wien.gv.at
wrote:
This is a review of the patch in 5192d7d2.8020...@catalyst.net.nz
The patch applies cleanly (with the exception of
On Monday, July 01, 2013 8:37 AM Josh Berkus wrote:
On 06/30/2013 12:33 AM, Amit kapila wrote:
On Sunday, June 30, 2013 11:37 AM Fabien COELHO wrote:
If we had a different set of tests, that would be a valid argument. But
we don't, so it's not. And nobody has offered to write a feature to
Magnus Hagander wrote:
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 1:49 PM, Albe Laurenz laurenz.a...@wien.gv.at
wrote:
I think that the column name is ok as it is, even if it
is a bit long - I cannot come up with a more succinct
idea. Perhaps n_changed_since_analyze could be shortened
to n_mod_since_analyze,
On 2013-06-26 18:52:30 +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
* Could you document the way slots prevent checkpoints from occurring
when XLogInsert rechecks for full page writes? I think it's correct -
but not very obvious on a glance.
There's this in the comment near the top of the file:
On 2013-06-28 23:14:23 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
Here's a further update of this patch. In this version, I added some
mechanism to send a new kind of sinval message that is sent when a
catalog without catcaches is updated; it doesn't apply to all
catalogs, just to whichever ones we want to
On 6/28/13 2:27 PM, David Fetter wrote:
You can run \! man from within psql,
And if you're on Windows, you're Sadly Out of Luck with that. Is
there an equivalent we could #ifdef in for that platform?
If you are using psql on Windows extensively, you probably have one of
mingw, cygwin, or
On 6/28/13 10:50 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 09:46:32AM -0500, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On 1/26/13 4:44 PM, Aaron W. Swenson wrote:
You are right. Had I read a little further down, it seems that the
exit status should actually be 7.
7 is OK for not running, but what
On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 02:59:35PM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
On 06/29/2013 02:14 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
AIUI: They do test feature use and errors that have cropped up in the
past that we need to beware of. They don't test every bug we've ever
had, nor do they exercise every piece of
Magnus Hagander wrote:
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 10:39 AM, Albe Laurenz laurenz.a...@wien.gv.at wrote:
I found a small bug in the implementation of LDAP connection
parameter lookup.
[...]
As coded now, the timeout won't work - if the LDAP server
is down, ldap_simple_bind will wait for the
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Btw., I just checked the source code of Apache, PHP, and PAM, and they
are all unconditionally building with LDAP_DEPRECATED. So maybe there
is no hurry about this.
I don't think that the old API functions will go away until there
is a new standard for the LDAP C API,
On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 10:05:24AM -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On 6/28/13 2:27 PM, David Fetter wrote:
You can run \! man from within psql,
And if you're on Windows, you're Sadly Out of Luck with that. Is
there an equivalent we could #ifdef in for that platform?
If you are using psql
Hi Fabien,
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 10:42 AM, Fabien COELHO coe...@cri.ensmp.fr wrote:
- I do not understand why the makefile specifies $(srcdir) before
local files in some places.
For VPATH builds :-)
Here is a v2 which is more likely to work under VPATH.
I really appreciate your
On 2013-07-01 07:14:23 -0700, David Fetter wrote:
If we had a different set of tests, that would be a valid argument. But
we don't, so it's not. And nobody has offered to write a feature to
split our tests either.
With utmost respect, this just isn't true. There is a make coverage
On 7/1/13 10:20 AM, David Fetter wrote:
On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 10:05:24AM -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On 6/28/13 2:27 PM, David Fetter wrote:
You can run \! man from within psql,
And if you're on Windows, you're Sadly Out of Luck with that. Is
there an equivalent we could #ifdef in for
Pavel Stehule escribió:
Hello
updated patch - precious Assert, more comments
Pavel, can you please remove quoted text from messages you reply to?
This message has 10kb of completely useless text.
Thanks,
--
Álvaro Herrerahttp://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development,
2013/6/29 Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com:
Hello
updated patch - precious Assert, more comments
Regards
Pavel
stripped
variadic_any_parser_check-3.patch
Description: Binary data
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your
Joe Conway escribió:
Actually, given that this change will create version 1.1 of the
extension, I believe the 1.0 versions of the sql scripts should
probably be removed entirely. Can someone with more knowledge of the
extension facility comment on that?
Besides what Michael said, another
As far as I understand, deconstruct_recurse() ensures that
SpecialJoinInfo of a new join always gets added to higher position in
join_info_list than SJ infos of all joins located below the new join in
the tree. I wonder if we can rely on that fact sometimes.
One possible use case could be
On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 10:52:55AM -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On 7/1/13 10:20 AM, David Fetter wrote:
On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 10:05:24AM -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On 6/28/13 2:27 PM, David Fetter wrote:
You can run \! man from within psql,
And if you're on Windows, you're Sadly
On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 11:52 PM, Greg Smith g...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On 6/30/13 9:28 PM, Jon Nelson wrote:
The performance of the latter (new) test sometimes seems to perform
worse and sometimes seems to perform better (usually worse) than
either of the other two. In all cases,
--On 13. Juni 2013 18:12:05 -0400 Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
What i tried before was to access (in PlanForeignModify) the RelOptInfo
structure through PlannerInfo-simple_rel_array, assuming the the
resultRelation index points to the right array member. However, that
didn't work, the
My PostgresSQL (9.2) is crashing after certain load tests. Currently,
postgressql is crashing when simulatenously 800 to 1000 threads are run on a
10 million records schema. Not sure, if we have to tweak some more
parameters of postgres.
-
jasmine
--
View this message in context:
On 1 July 2013 01:44, David Fetter da...@fetter.org wrote:
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 09:22:52PM +0100, Dean Rasheed wrote:
On 21 June 2013 06:16, David Fetter da...@fetter.org wrote:
Please find attached a patch which allows subqueries in the FILTER
clause and adds regression testing for same.
On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 04:42:04AM -0700, jasmine wrote:
My PostgresSQL (9.2) is crashing after certain load tests. Currently,
postgressql is crashing when simulatenously 800 to 1000 threads are run on a
10 million records schema. Not sure, if we have to tweak some more
parameters of postgres.
On Sun, 2013-06-30 at 16:09 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
It was originally generated. Since then it's been maintained by hand.
What is the procedure for maintaining it by hand? Why are
HAVE_POSIX_SIGNALS and HAVE_SYNC_FILE_RANGE in there (though commented
out), but not HAVE_POSIX_FADVISE?
Very minor comment here: these SGML id tags:
+ refentry id=SQL-ALTEREXTENSIONTEMPLATE
are pretty important, because they become the URL for the specific page
in the reference docs. So I think you should fix them to be the correct
spelling of the command alter template for extension, and also
On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 02:29:20PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 10:45 PM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
In studying pg_upgrade's handling of --help, I noticed that pg_ctl
supports -h for help, but it is the only tool to do so, and -h is not
documented. I
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 10:11:23AM -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On 6/28/13 10:50 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 09:46:32AM -0500, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On 1/26/13 4:44 PM, Aaron W. Swenson wrote:
You are right. Had I read a little further down, it seems that the
exit
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 11:05:37AM +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
On 26.06.2013 16:37, Amit Kapila wrote:
On Wednesday, June 26, 2013 2:15 AM Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
Can you also try the attached patch, please? It's the same as before,
but in this version, I didn't replace the prev and
On Sun, 2013-06-30 at 18:55 -0400, Greg Smith wrote:
This makes platform level testing a lot easier, thanks. Attached is an
updated copy of that program with some error checking. If the files it
creates already existed, the code didn't notice, and a series of write
errors happened. If
I think this is unlikely to work reliably:
+ PG_TRY();
+ {
+ ExtensionControl *control = read_extension_control_file(extname);
+
+ if (control)
+ {
+ ereport(ERROR,
+ (errcode(ERRCODE_DUPLICATE_OBJECT),
+errmsg(extension \%s\
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 10:02 PM, David Fetter da...@fetter.org wrote:
On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 04:42:04AM -0700, jasmine wrote:
My PostgresSQL (9.2) is crashing after certain load tests. Currently,
postgressql is crashing when simulatenously 800 to 1000 threads are run on a
10 million records
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 1:55 AM, Jeff Davis pg...@j-davis.com wrote:
On Sun, 2013-06-30 at 18:55 -0400, Greg Smith wrote:
This makes platform level testing a lot easier, thanks. Attached is an
updated copy of that program with some error checking. If the files it
creates already existed, the
On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 06:57:10AM +, Amit kapila wrote:
I have done the initial analysis and prepared a patch, don't know if
anything more I can do until
someone can give any suggestions to further proceed on this bug.
So, I guess we never figured this out.
I can submit this
On Sun, 2013-06-30 at 22:58 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
I thought that Jeff withdrew this patch.
No -- was there a reason you thought that? I know it could use another
round of testing before commit, and there may be a couple other things
to clear up. But I don't want to invest a lot of time there
Applied. I referenced macros for some of the new constants, e.g.
SECS_PER_HOUR.
---
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 10:04:49PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 05:40:40PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
I'm
Since this discussion seems to have stalled, let me do a quick summary.
The goal of this subset of patches is to allow retroactive look up of
relations starting from a WAL record. Currently, the WAL record only
tracks the relfilenode that it affects, so there are two possibilities:
1. we add
Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
So the question is, do we take the overhead of the new index (which
means overhead on DML operations -- supposedly rare) or do we take the
overhead of larger WAL records (which means overhead on all DDL
operations)?
Note we can make either
On Tue, 2013-07-02 at 02:13 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
Even in that case, if a user can easily know which platform posix_fallocate
should be used in, we can commit the patch with the configurable GUC
parameter.
I disagree here. We're not talking about a huge win; this speedup may
not even be
On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 3:24 AM, Amit kapila amit.kap...@huawei.com wrote:
Do you think it will be sufficient to just wake bgwriter when the buffers in
freelist drops
below low watermark, how about it's current job of flushing dirty buffers?
Well, the only point of flushing dirty buffers in
On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 1:08 PM, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com wrote:
2013/6/30 Gurjeet Singh gurj...@singh.im:
On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 11:46 AM, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com
wrote:
2013/6/30 Gurjeet Singh gurj...@singh.im:
On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 11:13 AM, Pavel Stehule
On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 11:54 PM, ian link i...@ilink.io wrote:
I found some time and I think I am up to speed now. I finally figured out
how to add new operator strategies and made a little test operator for
myself.
It seems pretty clear that assuming '+' and '-' are addition and subtraction
On 2013-07-01 14:16:55 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
So the question is, do we take the overhead of the new index (which
means overhead on DML operations -- supposedly rare) or do we take the
overhead of larger WAL records (which means overhead on
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 3:19 AM, Jeevan Chalke
jeevan.cha...@enterprisedb.com wrote:
I have re-validated this new patch and it looks good to go in now.
I saw that it's already marked ready for committer.
I don't normally like to commit things over another committer's
objections, but this has +1
While testing patch, I found that make installcheck breaks with your patch
and gives following error:
Indeed, I did not put the dependency for that target, I really tested
check bigcheck. The attached patch adds the needed dependency for
installcheck, and I could run it. I checked that no
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 10:04 AM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
This is really cool stuff.
Thanks.
I have to say, if the thing that primarily suffers is pretty extreme DDL
in extreme situations I am not really worried. Anybody running anything
close to the territory of such
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 10:20 AM, David Fetter da...@fetter.org wrote:
With deepest respect, failing to provide documentation to users on our
widest-deployed platform seems pretty hostile to me.
Yes, that would be pretty hostile. However, we don't do anything that
remotely resembles that
Robert Haas escribió:
On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 11:54 PM, ian link i...@ilink.io wrote:
It seems pretty clear that assuming '+' and '-' are addition and subtraction
is a bad idea. I don't think it would be too tricky to add support for new
operator strategies. Andrew Gierth suggested calling
On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 8:30 AM, Atri Sharma atri.j...@gmail.com wrote:
I have been reading the recent discussion and was researching a bit, and I
think that we should really go with the idea of randomising the input data(if
it is not completely presorted), to ensure that we do not get
On 07/01/2013 03:26 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
Regardless of whether you agree with or disagree with the above
statement, building a high-quality documentation reader into psql so
that users who are running Windows but not mingw, cygwin, or pgAdmin
can access the documentation more easily doesn't
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 3:28 PM, Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
Robert Haas escribió:
On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 11:54 PM, ian link i...@ilink.io wrote:
It seems pretty clear that assuming '+' and '-' are addition and
subtraction
is a bad idea. I don't think it would be too
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 2:17 PM, Jeff Davis pg...@j-davis.com wrote:
On Tue, 2013-07-02 at 02:13 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
Even in that case, if a user can easily know which platform posix_fallocate
should be used in, we can commit the patch with the configurable GUC
parameter.
I disagree
On 2013-06-28 11:25:50 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 10:53 AM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com
wrote:
Why does toast_insert_or_update() need to go through all the
rigamarole in toast_datum_differs()? I would have thought that it
could simply treat any
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 4:32 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
This shouldn't be too complex, and should give us a fixed nlogn complexity
even for wild data sets, without affecting existing normal data sets that
are present in every day transactions. I even believe that those data
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 9:26 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 10:20 AM, David Fetter da...@fetter.org wrote:
With deepest respect, failing to provide documentation to users on our
widest-deployed platform seems pretty hostile to me.
Yes, that would be pretty
On 7/1/13 12:34 PM, Jeff Davis wrote:
On Sun, 2013-06-30 at 16:09 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
It was originally generated. Since then it's been maintained by hand.
What is the procedure for maintaining it by hand?
Edit away.
Why are
HAVE_POSIX_SIGNALS and HAVE_SYNC_FILE_RANGE in there
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 1:21 PM, Jeff Davis pg...@j-davis.com wrote:
On Sun, 2013-06-30 at 22:58 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
I thought that Jeff withdrew this patch.
No -- was there a reason you thought that?
I thought I remembered you saying you were going to abandon it in the
face of
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 3:57 PM, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
How different are they really? Yes, they are very different from an
implementation standpoint, from an enduser perspective they really are
not. If they were, they'd probably be called something else.
They're different
On 07/01/2013 07:20 AM, David Fetter wrote:
On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 10:05:24AM -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On 6/28/13 2:27 PM, David Fetter wrote:
You can run \! man from within psql,
And if you're on Windows, you're Sadly Out of Luck with that. Is
there an equivalent we could #ifdef in
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 3:54 PM, Claudio Freire klaussfre...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 4:32 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
This shouldn't be too complex, and should give us a fixed nlogn complexity
even for wild data sets, without affecting existing normal data sets
On 7/1/13 12:47 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Approximately none of these changes seem correct to me. For example,
why is failing to open the PID file 6, or failing to start the server 7?
Well, according to that URL, we have:
6 program is not configured
7 program is
On 01.07.2013 13:28, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
Thanks! So, we have a lot of stuff and you give the points for further
work. Could you please verify my plan of work on these patches:
1) Solving questions of archives.postgresql.org/**
On 7/1/13 1:29 AM, james wrote:
Given how useful it is to have a scripting language that can be used
outside
of the database as well as inside it, would it be reasonable to consider
'promoting' pllua?
You can start promoting pllua by making it work with current PostgreSQL
versions. It hasn't
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 5:12 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 3:54 PM, Claudio Freire klaussfre...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 4:32 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
This shouldn't be too complex, and should give us a fixed nlogn
On 6/29/13 1:54 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
I haven't seen a response to this. One thing we are missing is
documentation. Given that I'm inclined to commit all of this (i.e.
cedric's patches 1,2,3, and 4 plus my addition).
Could someone post an updated set of patches that is currently under
On 7/1/13 3:47 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
and it is a part of our ToDo: Add function to allow the creation of
timestamps using parameters
so we can have a functions with signatures
I would just name them date(...), time(...), etc.
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION construct_date(year int, month int
On 17 June 2013 18:14, Marko Kreen mark...@gmail.com wrote:
Perhaps existing tests in guc.sql should be merged into it?
Thanks Marko for pointing out about guc.sql.
Please find attached a patch to move DISCARD related tests from guc.sql to
discard.sql. It adds an extra test for a DISCARD
On 6/19/13 9:57 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Ping. This ought to be fixed before 9.3 goes out.
Will fix.
On Sat, 2013-04-27 at 21:22 -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
The pg_resetxlog -m option was changed from
The man page lists the -m option as -m mxid,mxid, but the
On 07/01/2013 04:39 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On 6/29/13 1:54 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
I haven't seen a response to this. One thing we are missing is
documentation. Given that I'm inclined to commit all of this (i.e.
cedric's patches 1,2,3, and 4 plus my addition).
Could someone post an
On 27 June 2013 23:18, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Exactly what is the argument that says performance of this
function is sufficiently critical to justify adding both the maintenance
overhead of a new pg_class index, *and* a broken-by-design syscache?
I think we all agree on changing
On 7/1/13 3:44 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
Yeah. If the patch isn't going to be a win on RHEL 5, I'd consider
that a good reason to scrap it for now and revisit it in 3 years.
There are still a LOT of people running RHEL 5, and the win isn't big
enough to engineer a more complex solution.
I'm
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 12:32 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
I have been reading the recent discussion and was researching a bit, and I
think that we should really go with the idea of randomising the input
data(if it is not completely presorted), to ensure that we do not get
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On 6/19/13 9:57 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Ping. This ought to be fixed before 9.3 goes out.
Will fix.
On Sat, 2013-04-27 at 21:22 -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
The pg_resetxlog -m option was changed from
The man page lists the
1 - 100 of 126 matches
Mail list logo
