On 2013-10-20 08:12:37 -0700, David Fetter wrote:
> > what will happen to patches left in pending state in the 2013-09 CF?
>
> I have moved them to the next CF. This does not mean that they are
> abandoned until then. I strongly suspect that people will be
> reviewing and committing many of them
On 20 October 2013 12:06 Amit Kapila wrote:
>On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 3:37 PM, Haribabu kommi
>wrote:
>> On 12 October 2013 11:30 Tom Lane wrote:
>>>Haribabu kommi writes:
To handle the above case instead of directly resetting the dead
tuples as zero, how if the exact dead tuples are r
2013/10/21 Noah Misch
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 01:06:15PM +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> > On 12.08.2013 21:08, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> >> 2013/8/10 Tom Lane:
> >>> Pavel Stehule writes:
> I found so there are no simple API for working with LO from PL without
> access to file syste
On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 01:56:23PM -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-10-18 at 18:46 -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> > As to your point about not wanting to do it for a single image- it seems
> > we could potentially say that for every individual image proposed, but
> > if we don't keep tr
Hi, I've been using postgres for many years but never took the time to play
with the code until now. As a learning experience i came up with this WIP
patch to keep track of the # of bytes sent and received by the server over
it's communication sockets. Counters are kept per database, per connection
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 12:10:17AM +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2013-10-17 18:04:34 -0400, Noah Misch wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 08:27:01PM +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
> > > On 2013-10-17 12:33:45 -0400, Noah Misch wrote:
> > > > > 1. Is there any guarantee that sizeof(intptr_t) >= size
On 10/20/2013 08:38 PM, Tomas Vondra wrote:
Hi,
I ran into some pretty strange behavior of C-language function and
default parameter values, both on 9.2 and 9.4devel. Consider for example
this trivial C function:
Datum
show_bug(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) {
elog(WARNING, "called ;-)");
On 21.10.2013 02:38, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I ran into some pretty strange behavior of C-language function and
> default parameter values, both on 9.2 and 9.4devel. Consider for example
> this trivial C function:
>
> Datum
> show_bug(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) {
> elog(WARNING, "calle
Hi,
I ran into some pretty strange behavior of C-language function and
default parameter values, both on 9.2 and 9.4devel. Consider for example
this trivial C function:
Datum
show_bug(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) {
elog(WARNING, "called ;-)");
PG_RETURN_VOID();
}
which is access
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 01:06:15PM +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> On 12.08.2013 21:08, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>> 2013/8/10 Tom Lane:
>>> Pavel Stehule writes:
I found so there are no simple API for working with LO from PL without
access to file system.
>>>
>>> What? See lo_open(), lor
Noah Misch writes:
> wrapper function. A backend change that would help here is to extend event
> triggers to cover the CLUSTER command, permitting you to inject monitoring
> after plain CLUSTER and dispense with the wrapper.
I didn't look in any level of details, but it might be as simple as
mo
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 10:42:10AM +0200, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2013-10-19 17:20 keltezéssel, David Fetter írta:
> >Thanks very much to Mike Blackwell and Craig Kerstiens for their
> >persistence through what most people would consider a tedious and
> >thankless task. Thanks also to
On 15-10-2013 14:34, Josh Berkus wrote:
> On 10/15/2013 07:36 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Andres Freund
>> wrote:
>>> Josh said we should treat replication connections in a separate "pool"
>>> from normal database connections, right? So you withdraw your earlier
>>
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 2:22 AM, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> There has recently been considerable discussion around auto-tuning.
> Throughout the course of this discussion, I raised the idea of
> creating a new GUC to separately control autovacuum's usage of
> maintenance_work_mem [1], explaining the
Hi,
2013-10-19 17:20 keltezéssel, David Fetter írta:
Thanks very much to Mike Blackwell and Craig Kerstiens for their
persistence through what most people would consider a tedious and
thankless task. Thanks also to the patch submitters, reviewers and
other participants.
That the formal commitf
On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 05:11:55PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I am in Moscow with Alexander and we were discussing GIN pg_upgrade
> issues. One option we have already discussed was to take the old GIN
> index code and put it in a separate directory, and call the new GIN
> index something differ
16 matches
Mail list logo
