[HACKERS] We no longer have a fallback for machines without working int64
As pointed out here http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2010-01/msg00145.php the current zic code doesn't cope gracefully with lack of working int64. Considering the trouble we've gone to throughout the rest of the system to support such compilers, it's a bit annoying to have this little detail break it. On the other hand, it's unclear that anybody still cares. (Other than people running SCO Openserver, for whom I have little sympathy anyway.) Thoughts? Is it worth expending any energy on? regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Re: [HACKERS] We no longer have a fallback for machines without working int64
Tom Lane wrote: As pointed out here http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2010-01/msg00145.php the current zic code doesn't cope gracefully with lack of working int64. Considering the trouble we've gone to throughout the rest of the system to support such compilers, it's a bit annoying to have this little detail break it. On the other hand, it's unclear that anybody still cares. (Other than people running SCO Openserver, for whom I have little sympathy anyway.) Thoughts? Is it worth expending any energy on? Yeah, I'd say this much: #ifdef INT64_IS_BUSTED #error unsupported platform #endif -- Alvaro Herrerahttp://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Re: [HACKERS] We no longer have a fallback for machines without working int64
On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 10:47:33AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: As pointed out here http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2010-01/msg00145.php the current zic code doesn't cope gracefully with lack of working int64. Considering the trouble we've gone to throughout the rest of the system to support such compilers, it's a bit annoying to have this little detail break it. On the other hand, it's unclear that anybody still cares. (Other than people running SCO Openserver, for whom I have little sympathy anyway.) Thoughts? There was a use case for supporting non-working int64, but reality has changed. Is it worth expending any energy on? Not IMHO. Cheers, David. -- David Fetter da...@fetter.org http://fetter.org/ Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fet...@gmail.com iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics Remember to vote! Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Re: [HACKERS] We no longer have a fallback for machines without working int64
David Fetter da...@fetter.org writes: On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 10:47:33AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: As pointed out here http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2010-01/msg00145.php the current zic code doesn't cope gracefully with lack of working int64. Considering the trouble we've gone to throughout the rest of the system to support such compilers, it's a bit annoying to have this little detail break it. On the other hand, it's unclear that anybody still cares. (Other than people running SCO Openserver, for whom I have little sympathy anyway.) There was a use case for supporting non-working int64, but reality has changed. Yeah, maybe it's time to forget about that. If so, we ought to change configure to spit up if it can't find a working 64-bit type. Failing much later on with a strange message from zic isn't too acceptable. I propose doing that in both HEAD and 8.4, since both those branches are broken for someone with such a compiler. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers