On tor, 2012-02-09 at 23:02 +0100, Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net writes:
Make tab-completion complete also function names – like: SELECT
pg_gettabtab to see all functions that start with pg_get.
Make tab-completion work for columns in SELECT. I know that when
On fre, 2012-02-10 at 01:24 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
That seems pretty nearly entirely bogus. What is the argument for
supposing that the word right after SELECT is a function name? I would
think it would be a column name (from who-knows-what table) much more
often.
That's what the patch
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 1:24 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net writes:
That seems pretty useful, and it's more or less a one-line change, as in
the attached patch.
That seems pretty nearly entirely bogus. What is the argument for
supposing that the word
2012/2/10 Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com:
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 1:24 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net writes:
That seems pretty useful, and it's more or less a one-line change, as in
the attached patch.
That seems pretty nearly entirely bogus.
On 10/02/12 08:50, Robert Haas wrote:
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 1:24 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net writes:
That seems pretty useful, and it's more or less a one-line change, as in
the attached patch.
That seems pretty nearly entirely bogus. What
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 1:24 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
That seems pretty nearly entirely bogus. What is the argument for
supposing that the word right after SELECT is a function name?
It isn't necessarily, but it might be. It'd
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 10:20 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 1:24 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
That seems pretty nearly entirely bogus. What is the argument for
supposing that the word right after SELECT is a
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 10:20 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
I'm not against tab-completing functions, if people think that's
useful. I am against tab-completing them in 1% of use-cases, which is
what this patch accomplishes. The fact that
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 11:01 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 10:20 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
I'm not against tab-completing functions, if people think that's
useful. I am against tab-completing them in 1%
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 11:01 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Well, if you want a patch with low standards, what about tab-completing
function names anywhere that we do not see context suggesting something
else?
I think that without a bit more
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 11:22 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 11:01 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Well, if you want a patch with low standards, what about tab-completing
function names anywhere that we do not see
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Robert Haas wrote:
One thing that's been bugging me for a while is that the tab
completion code all works by looking backward up to n words. What we
really want to know is what kind of statement we're in and where we
are in it. Absent
In his blog entry http://www.depesz.com/2011/07/08/wish-list-for-psql/
depesz described a simple way to do tab completion for SELECT in psql:
Make tab-completion complete also function names – like: SELECT
pg_gettabtab to see all functions that start with pg_get.
Make tab-completion work for
Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net writes:
Make tab-completion complete also function names – like: SELECT
pg_gettabtab to see all functions that start with pg_get.
Make tab-completion work for columns in SELECT. I know that when writing
SELECT clause, psql doesn’t know which table it will deal
Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net writes:
That seems pretty useful, and it's more or less a one-line change, as in
the attached patch.
That seems pretty nearly entirely bogus. What is the argument for
supposing that the word right after SELECT is a function name? I would
think it would be a
15 matches
Mail list logo
