On 24/12/14 15:15, Bruce Momjian wrote:
On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 06:00:21PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Bruce Momjian wrote:
I noticed this when looking at the allocated shared memory structures in
head:
shared memory alignment 64-byte of CommitTs Ctl: 0
shared memory alignmen
On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 06:00:21PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > I noticed this when looking at the allocated shared memory structures in
> > head:
> >
> > shared memory alignment 64-byte of CommitTs Ctl: 0
> > shared memory alignment 64-byte of CommitTs shared:
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I noticed this when looking at the allocated shared memory structures in
> head:
>
> shared memory alignment 64-byte of CommitTs Ctl: 0
> shared memory alignment 64-byte of CommitTs shared: 0
>
> I thought we got rid of the idea that 'Ts' means timestamp. Was