On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 11:43 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Thom Brown wrote:
>> On 7 March 2011 22:31, Robert Haas wrote:
>> > On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 6:16 AM, Thom Brown wrote:
>> >> On 7 March 2011 15:27, Thom Brown wrote:
>> >>> I've attached a small patch with a bit of clarification and a typo
Thom Brown wrote:
> On 7 March 2011 22:31, Robert Haas wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 6:16 AM, Thom Brown wrote:
> >> On 7 March 2011 15:27, Thom Brown wrote:
> >>> I've attached a small patch with a bit of clarification and a typo fix
> >>> in the synchronous_standby_names parameter info.
>
On 8 March 2011 01:08, David Fetter wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 02:31:18PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 2:07 PM, David Fetter wrote:
>> > Re: docs, I'd actually like to see that list gone, as the separation
>> > of docs from code is one that's actively unhelpful. We d
On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 02:31:18PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 2:07 PM, David Fetter wrote:
> > Re: docs, I'd actually like to see that list gone, as the separation
> > of docs from code is one that's actively unhelpful. We don't have a
> > separate "docs" team, and we righ
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 2:07 PM, David Fetter wrote:
> Re: docs, I'd actually like to see that list gone, as the separation
> of docs from code is one that's actively unhelpful. We don't have a
> separate "docs" team, and we rightly put the responsibility of
> documenting changes on the person or
On 3/7/11 11:07 AM, David Fetter wrote:
> Re: docs, I'd actually like to see that list gone, as the separation
> of docs from code is one that's actively unhelpful. We don't have a
> separate "docs" team, and we rightly put the responsibility of
> documenting changes on the person or people patchi
On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 01:01:05PM -0600, Ross J. Reedstrom wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 03:45:17PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of lun mar 07 15:16:31 -0300
> > 2011:
> >
> > > If we do that then it becomes worth wondering what the -docs
> > > list is for
On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 03:45:17PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of lun mar 07 15:16:31 -0300 2011:
>
> > If we do that then it becomes worth wondering what the -docs list is for
> > at all. Maybe we *should* get rid of it; I dunno. I see your point
> > about ho
Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of lun mar 07 15:16:31 -0300 2011:
> If we do that then it becomes worth wondering what the -docs list is for
> at all. Maybe we *should* get rid of it; I dunno. I see your point
> about how the factual issues involved in a docs change ought to be
> vetted on -ha
Thom Brown writes:
> On 7 March 2011 23:21, David Fetter wrote:
>> As I'm putting together the patches section for the PostgreSQL Weekly
>> News, it helps me *enormously* to have only one list I need to check,
>> so at least for me, it's an enormous help to have all patches at least
>> CC'd, or b
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 1:04 PM, Thom Brown wrote:
> On 7 March 2011 23:21, David Fetter wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 10:53:17PM +0530, Thom Brown wrote:
>>> On 7 March 2011 22:31, Robert Haas wrote:
>>> > On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 6:16 AM, Thom Brown wrote:
>>> >> On 7 March 2011 15:27, Thom
On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 11:34:48PM +0530, Thom Brown wrote:
> On 7 March 2011 23:21, David Fetter wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 10:53:17PM +0530, Thom Brown wrote:
> >> On 7 March 2011 22:31, Robert Haas wrote:
> >> > On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 6:16 AM, Thom Brown wrote:
> >> >> On 7 March 2011
On 7 March 2011 23:21, David Fetter wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 10:53:17PM +0530, Thom Brown wrote:
>> On 7 March 2011 22:31, Robert Haas wrote:
>> > On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 6:16 AM, Thom Brown wrote:
>> >> On 7 March 2011 15:27, Thom Brown wrote:
>> >>> I've attached a small patch with a b
On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 10:53:17PM +0530, Thom Brown wrote:
> On 7 March 2011 22:31, Robert Haas wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 6:16 AM, Thom Brown wrote:
> >> On 7 March 2011 15:27, Thom Brown wrote:
> >>> I've attached a small patch with a bit of clarification and a typo fix
> >>> in the sy
On 7 March 2011 22:31, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 6:16 AM, Thom Brown wrote:
>> On 7 March 2011 15:27, Thom Brown wrote:
>>> I've attached a small patch with a bit of clarification and a typo fix
>>> in the synchronous_standby_names parameter info.
>>
>> Okay, I've noticed that
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 6:16 AM, Thom Brown wrote:
> On 7 March 2011 15:27, Thom Brown wrote:
>> I've attached a small patch with a bit of clarification and a typo fix
>> in the synchronous_standby_names parameter info.
>
> Okay, I've noticed that the main documentation also needed some fixes,
> s
16 matches
Mail list logo
