On 18 September 2012 10:32, Hitoshi Harada wrote:
> As wiki says, BERNOULLI relies on the statistics of the table, which
> doesn't sound good to me. Of course we could say this is our
> restriction and say good-bye to users who hadn't run ANALYZE first,
> but it is too hard for a normal users to
On 17 May 2013 21:46, Jaime Casanova wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 10:22 PM, Qi Huang wrote:
>> Dear hackers
>> Sorry for not replying the patch review. I didn't see the review until
>> recently as my mail box is full of Postgres mails and I didn't notice the
>> one for me, my mail box con
On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 10:22 PM, Qi Huang wrote:
> Dear hackers
> Sorry for not replying the patch review. I didn't see the review until
> recently as my mail box is full of Postgres mails and I didn't notice the
> one for me, my mail box configuration problem.
> I am still kind of busy
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 2:04 PM, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On 17 January 2013 18:32, Josh Berkus wrote:
>> On 11/04/2012 07:22 PM, Qi Huang wrote:
>>> Dear hackers Sorry for not replying the patch review. I didn't see the
>>> review until recently as my mail box is full of Postgres mails and I di
> So I can't see this going anywhere for 9.3. I've moved it to CF1 of
> 9.4 marked Waiting on Author
Agreed. I wish I'd noticed that it got lost earlier.
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make
On 17 January 2013 18:32, Josh Berkus wrote:
> On 11/04/2012 07:22 PM, Qi Huang wrote:
>> Dear hackers Sorry for not replying the patch review. I didn't see the
>> review until recently as my mail box is full of Postgres mails and I didn't
>> notice the one for me, my mail box configuration
On 11/04/2012 07:22 PM, Qi Huang wrote:
> Dear hackers Sorry for not replying the patch review. I didn't see the
> review until recently as my mail box is full of Postgres mails and I didn't
> notice the one for me, my mail box configuration problem. I am still kind
> of busy with my uni
On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 10:22 PM, Qi Huang wrote:
> Dear hackers
> Sorry for not replying the patch review. I didn't see the review until
> recently as my mail box is full of Postgres mails and I didn't notice the
> one for me, my mail box configuration problem.
> I am still kind of busy
ubject: Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH]Tablesample Submission
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 23:08:41 +0800
> Please add your patch here:
>
> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/commitfest_view/open
>
> --
> Robert Haas
> EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
> The Enterprise Po
Hitoshi Harada escribió:
> Patch does not apply cleanly against latest master. outfuncs.c,
> allpath.c and cost.h have rejected parts. The make check failed in a
> lot of cases up to 26 out of 133. I didn't look into each issue but I
> suggest rebasing on the latest master and making sure the r
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 8:08 AM, Qi Huang wrote:
>> Please add your patch here:
>>
>> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/commitfest_view/open
>>
>> --
>> Robert Haas
>> EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
>> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>
> Hi, Robert
> I added it under "Misce
> Please add your patch here:
>
> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/commitfest_view/open
>
> --
> Robert Haas
> EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
Hi, Robert
I added it under "Miscellaneous".
https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patc
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 9:52 PM, Qi Huang wrote:
> Hi, hackers
> I made the final version tablesample patch. It is implementing SYSTEM
> and BERNOULLI sample method, which is basically "feature-complete". The
> regression test is also included in this patch.
> There is an wiki documentati
13 matches
Mail list logo
