On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 8:14 AM, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>> On 26 May 2017, at 17:08, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I'll commit and back-patch this without a test case. Possibly Frost will
>> be excited enough about it to add something to the pg_dump TAP tests,
>> but those tests are too opaque for me to
> On 26 May 2017, at 17:08, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Daniel Gustafsson writes:
>> While hacking on pg_upgrade in downstream Greenplum I ran into an error which
>> seems like an old, and obscure, bug in pg_dump (unrelated to pg_upgrade).
>> pg_dump generates incorrect SQL for an operator class which h
Daniel Gustafsson writes:
> While hacking on pg_upgrade in downstream Greenplum I ran into an error which
> seems like an old, and obscure, bug in pg_dump (unrelated to pg_upgrade).
> pg_dump generates incorrect SQL for an operator class which has no operators
> or
> procedures, and which has the
While hacking on pg_upgrade in downstream Greenplum I ran into an error which
seems like an old, and obscure, bug in pg_dump (unrelated to pg_upgrade).
pg_dump generates incorrect SQL for an operator class which has no operators or
procedures, and which has the same column and storage types. While
