On 04/06/2017 08:33 AM, Noah Misch wrote:
On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 10:10:59AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 2:30 AM, Jeff Janes wrote:
On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 4:59 AM, Michael Paquier
wrote:
On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 1:17 AM, Joe Conway wrote:
On 03/07/2017 08:29 PM, To
On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 10:10:59AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 2:30 AM, Jeff Janes wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 4:59 AM, Michael Paquier
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 1:17 AM, Joe Conway wrote:
> >> > On 03/07/2017 08:29 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> >>
On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 2:30 AM, Jeff Janes wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 4:59 AM, Michael Paquier
> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 1:17 AM, Joe Conway wrote:
>> > On 03/07/2017 08:29 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> >> Michael Paquier writes:
>> >>> here is a separate thread dedicated to the foll
On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 4:59 AM, Michael Paquier
wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 1:17 AM, Joe Conway wrote:
> > On 03/07/2017 08:29 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Michael Paquier writes:
> >>> here is a separate thread dedicated to the following extension for
> >>> CREATE/ALTER ROLE: PASSWORD ('value'
On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 12:00 AM, Joe Conway wrote:
> On 03/09/2017 06:34 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 7:59 AM, Michael Paquier
>> wrote:
>>> Yes, I agree with that for MD5, and after looking around I can see
>>> (like here http://prosody.im/doc/plain_or_hashed) as well that
>
On 03/09/2017 06:34 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 7:59 AM, Michael Paquier
> wrote:
>> Yes, I agree with that for MD5, and after looking around I can see
>> (like here http://prosody.im/doc/plain_or_hashed) as well that
>> SCRAM-hashed is used. Now, there are as well references t
On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 7:59 AM, Michael Paquier
wrote:
> Yes, I agree with that for MD5, and after looking around I can see
> (like here http://prosody.im/doc/plain_or_hashed) as well that
> SCRAM-hashed is used. Now, there are as well references to the salt,
> like in protocol.sgml:
> "The salt t
On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 1:17 AM, Joe Conway wrote:
> On 03/07/2017 08:29 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Michael Paquier writes:
>>> here is a separate thread dedicated to the following extension for
>>> CREATE/ALTER ROLE: PASSWORD ('value' USING 'method').
>>
>> The parentheses seem weird ... do we really
On 03/07/2017 08:29 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Michael Paquier writes:
>> here is a separate thread dedicated to the following extension for
>> CREATE/ALTER ROLE: PASSWORD ('value' USING 'method').
>
> The parentheses seem weird ... do we really need those?
+1
> +If you do not plan to use pa
On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 2:32 PM, Rushabh Lathia wrote:
> One quick comments:
>
> +| PASSWORD '(' Sconst USING Sconst ')'
> +{
> +$$ = makeDefElem("methodPassword",
> + (Node *)list_make2(makeString($3),
> +
On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 9:59 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Michael Paquier writes:
> > here is a separate thread dedicated to the following extension for
> > CREATE/ALTER ROLE: PASSWORD ('value' USING 'method').
>
> The parentheses seem weird ... do we really need those?
>
+1
I had quick glance to patc
On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 1:29 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Michael Paquier writes:
>> here is a separate thread dedicated to the following extension for
>> CREATE/ALTER ROLE: PASSWORD ('value' USING 'method').
>
> The parentheses seem weird ... do we really need those?
A grammar without parenthesis works
Michael Paquier writes:
> here is a separate thread dedicated to the following extension for
> CREATE/ALTER ROLE: PASSWORD ('value' USING 'method').
The parentheses seem weird ... do we really need those?
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-
Hi all,
As discussed on the thread dedicated to SCRAM
(https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/243d8c11-6149-a4bb-0909-136992f74...@iki.fi),
here is a separate thread dedicated to the following extension for
CREATE/ALTER ROLE: PASSWORD ('value' USING 'method').
Now that password_encryption has been
14 matches
Mail list logo
