Re: [HACKERS] RBLs ... I'm tired of spam ...

2003-05-31 Thread carl garland
I know there are alot of people that really appreciate PG and all the work that so many people have contributed. I am also sure that there are alot of people who would like to contribute to PG but don't feel they have any means except in the evangelism arena. This is something you could

Re: [HACKERS] RBLs ... I'm tired of spam ...

2003-05-28 Thread Oleg Bartunov
I'm using bogofilter. It works well after learning what is spam/non spam. I save all spam into seprarate box and check it once a week. It takes mostly pressing d in pine and could be done very quickly. Oleg On Tue, 27 May 2003, Marc G. Fournier wrote: *Way* off topic ... but I'm

[HACKERS] RBLs ... I'm tired of spam ...

2003-05-27 Thread Marc G. Fournier
*Way* off topic ... but I'm tired of processing through 300 messages nightly of which 10 are stuff that need to be approved for the lists, and 290 are trash ... What are ppl using / trusting out there as far as Free RBLs are concerned? ---(end of

Re: [HACKERS] RBLs ... I'm tired of spam ...

2003-05-27 Thread Larry Rosenman
FEATURE(dnsbl,`korea.services.net',``Mail from ${client_addr} rejected by korea.services.net'')dnl FEATURE(dnsbl,`brazil.blackholes.us',``Mail from ${client_addr} rejected by brazil.blackholes.us'')dnl FEATURE(dnsbl,`opm.blitzed.org',``Mail from ${client_addr} rejected by opm.blitzed.org'')dnl

Re: [HACKERS] RBLs ... I'm tired of spam ...

2003-05-27 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On Tue, 27 May 2003, Marc G. Fournier wrote: *Way* off topic ... but I'm tired of processing through 300 messages nightly of which 10 are stuff that need to be approved for the lists, and 290 are trash ... What are ppl using / trusting out there as far as Free RBLs are concerned? Avoid

Re: [HACKERS] RBLs ... I'm tired of spam ...

2003-05-27 Thread Michael A Nachbaur
Install SpamAssassin, and let it figure it out for you. It uses a whole list of RBLs and uses them to score a message as spam, instead of just blanket-denying messages from those SMTP servers. It works quite well. On Tuesday 27 May 2003 01:41 pm, Marc G. Fournier wrote: *Way* off topic ...

Re: [HACKERS] RBLs ... I'm tired of spam ...

2003-05-27 Thread Ricardo Ryoiti S. Junior
Larry Rosenman wrote: FEATURE(dnsbl,`korea.services.net',``Mail from ${client_addr} rejected by korea.services.net'')dnl FEATURE(dnsbl,`brazil.blackholes.us',``Mail from ${client_addr} rejected by brazil.blackholes.us'')dnl Yes, SPAM is really a problem here. Unfortunatelly, telco

Re: [HACKERS] RBLs ... I'm tired of spam ...

2003-05-27 Thread scott.marlowe
Another vote for SpamAssassin. We use it at work here and it's quite nice. It puts all the borderline spam in a holding area and sends you a daily email with all the topics / names listed and you can request those out of the spam bucket. It's configurable to the extreme. On Tue, 27 May

Re: [HACKERS] RBLs ... I'm tired of spam ...

2003-05-27 Thread The Hermit Hacker
On Tue, 27 May 2003, Vince Vielhaber wrote: On Tue, 27 May 2003, Marc G. Fournier wrote: *Way* off topic ... but I'm tired of processing through 300 messages nightly of which 10 are stuff that need to be approved for the lists, and 290 are trash ... What are ppl using / trusting out

Re: [HACKERS] RBLs ... I'm tired of spam ...

2003-05-27 Thread The Hermit Hacker
On Tue, 27 May 2003, scott.marlowe wrote: Another vote for SpamAssassin. We use it at work here and it's quite nice. It puts all the borderline spam in a holding area and sends you a daily email with all the topics / names listed and you can request those out of the spam bucket. It's

Re: [HACKERS] RBLs ... I'm tired of spam ...

2003-05-27 Thread Larry Rosenman
Per user or site I use Spamassassin AFTER the 4 RBL's and a personal fecal Roster. --On Tuesday, May 27, 2003 21:31:45 -0300 The Hermit Hacker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 27 May 2003, scott.marlowe wrote: Another vote for SpamAssassin. We use it at work here and it's quite nice.

Re: [HACKERS] RBLs ... I'm tired of spam ...

2003-05-27 Thread Allan Wind
On 2003-05-27 21:31:45, The Hermit Hacker wrote: 'K, I haven't found *that* feature yet ... can you do this on a per-user basis as well, or is this a 'blanket, site wide' configuration ... # When using the 'local:' quarantine method (default), the following # applies: # # A finer control of