On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 4:33 AM, Richard Huxton d...@archonet.com wrote:
2. Why have a finish.replication file, rather than SELECT
pg_finish_replication()?
I thought that the trigger file method was more easy-to-use for the
existing users since it had been used in pg_standby for a long time
so
Fujii Masao wrote:
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 4:33 AM, Richard Huxton d...@archonet.com wrote:
2. Why have a finish.replication file, rather than SELECT
pg_finish_replication()?
I thought that the trigger file method was more easy-to-use for the
existing users since it had been used in
On Fri, 2010-02-12 at 09:49 +, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
Log Message:
---
Reduce the chatter to the log when starting a standby server. Don't
echo all the recovery.conf options. Don't emit the initializing
recovery connections message, which doesn't mean anything to a user.
Simon Riggs wrote:
* entering standby mode isn't a more informative message. Two people
have already said on-list that standby mode name might need to be
changed.
Well, I'm all ears for better suggestions.
More informative, for me, would be something like entering
streaming replication mode
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 9:55 AM, Heikki Linnakangas
heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com wrote:
That doesn't accurately describe what the standby_mode setting does. It
doesn't imply streaming replication. It means that the server doesn't
end recovery when it reaches end of WAL, but keeps trying.
Robert Haas wrote:
Furthermore, if you're wanting to use pg_standby, you might be
forgiven for thinking that you should set standby_mode = on; but in
fact that's exactly the wrong thing to do.
Yeah, I think that's the main weakness of the name standby_mode. It's
pretty descriptive otherwise,
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 10:27 AM, Heikki Linnakangas
heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com wrote:
Robert Haas wrote:
Furthermore, if you're wanting to use pg_standby, you might be
forgiven for thinking that you should set standby_mode = on; but in
fact that's exactly the wrong thing to do.
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 12:28 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, let's come up with something else then.
continuous_recovery ?
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list
On 12/02/10 15:37, Fujii Masao wrote:
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 12:28 AM, Robert Haasrobertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, let's come up with something else then.
continuous_recovery ?
One problem with the otherwise entirely wonderful HS/SR pairing is the
whole business of the config
Heikki Linnakangas heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com writes:
Robert Haas wrote:
Furthermore, if you're wanting to use pg_standby, you might be
forgiven for thinking that you should set standby_mode = on; but in
fact that's exactly the wrong thing to do.
Yeah, I think that's the main
10 matches
Mail list logo
