Tomas Vondra writes:
> I've checked how this worked in 9.2 (before the 9.3 patch that split the
> file per db), and back then last_statsrequest (transformed to
> request_time) was used to decide whether we need to write something. But
> now we do that by simply
On 05/31/2016 07:24 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Tomas Vondra writes:
On 05/31/2016 06:59 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
I'm confused here --- are you speaking of having removed
if (msg->cutoff_time > req->request_time)
req->request_time = msg->cutoff_time;
?
Tomas Vondra writes:
> On 05/31/2016 06:59 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I'm confused here --- are you speaking of having removed
>> if (msg->cutoff_time > req->request_time)
>> req->request_time = msg->cutoff_time;
>> ? That is not a check for clock skew,
On 05/31/2016 06:59 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Tomas Vondra writes:
On 05/26/2016 10:10 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
I posted a patch at
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/13023.1464213...@sss.pgh.pa.us
which I think is functionally equivalent to what you have here, but
it
Tomas Vondra writes:
> On 05/26/2016 10:10 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I posted a patch at
>> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/13023.1464213...@sss.pgh.pa.us
>> which I think is functionally equivalent to what you have here, but
>> it goes to some lengths to make the
Hi,
On 05/26/2016 10:10 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Tomas Vondra writes:
Attached is a patch that should fix the coalescing, including the clock
skew detection. In the end I reorganized the code a bit, moving the
check at the end, after the clock skew detection.
Tomas Vondra writes:
> On 05/26/2016 10:10 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> In view of 52e8fc3e2, there's more or less no case in which we'd be
>> writing stats without writing stats for the shared catalogs. So I'm
>> tempted to propose that we try to reduce the overhead by
On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 6:43 PM, Tomas Vondra
wrote:
> On 05/26/2016 10:10 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Tomas Vondra writes:
>> In view of 52e8fc3e2, there's more or less no case in which we'd be
>> writing stats without writing stats for the
Hi,
On 05/26/2016 10:10 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Tomas Vondra writes:
Attached is a patch that should fix the coalescing, including the clock
skew detection. In the end I reorganized the code a bit, moving the
check at the end, after the clock skew detection.
Tomas Vondra writes:
> Attached is a patch that should fix the coalescing, including the clock
> skew detection. In the end I reorganized the code a bit, moving the
> check at the end, after the clock skew detection. Otherwise I'd have to
> do the clock skew
Hi,
On 03/15/2016 03:04 AM, Noah Misch wrote:
On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 01:33:08PM +0100, Tomas Vondra wrote:
On 03/14/2016 07:14 AM, Noah Misch wrote:
On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 02:00:03AM +0100, Tomas Vondra wrote:
+* XXX Maybe this should also care about the clock skew, just like the
+
On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 01:33:08PM +0100, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> On 03/14/2016 07:14 AM, Noah Misch wrote:
> >On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 02:00:03AM +0100, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> >>+* XXX Maybe this should also care about the clock skew, just like the
> >>+* block a few lines down.
> >
>
Hi,
On 03/14/2016 07:14 AM, Noah Misch wrote:
[Aside: your new mail editor is rewrapping lines in quoted material, and the
result is messy. I have rerewrapped one paragraph below.]
Thanks, I've noticed that too. I've been testing Evolution in the past
few days, and apparently the line
[Aside: your new mail editor is rewrapping lines in quoted material, and the
result is messy. I have rerewrapped one paragraph below.]
On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 02:00:03AM +0100, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> On Sun, 2016-03-13 at 18:46 -0400, Noah Misch wrote:
> > I've not attempted to study the behavior
On Sun, 2016-03-13 at 18:46 -0400, Noah Misch wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 06:08:07AM +0100, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> >
> > On 02/03/2016 06:46 AM, Noah Misch wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 07:03:45PM +0100, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On 12/22/2015 03:49 PM, Noah Misch
On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 06:08:07AM +0100, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> On 02/03/2016 06:46 AM, Noah Misch wrote:
> >On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 07:03:45PM +0100, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> >>On 12/22/2015 03:49 PM, Noah Misch wrote:
> >>>On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 06:19:12PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> I have
Hi,
On 02/03/2016 06:46 AM, Noah Misch wrote:
On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 07:03:45PM +0100, Tomas Vondra wrote:
On 12/22/2015 03:49 PM, Noah Misch wrote:
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 06:19:12PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
I have pushed it now. Further testing, of course, is always welcome.
While
On 02/03/2016 06:46 AM, Noah Misch wrote:
On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 07:03:45PM +0100, Tomas Vondra wrote:
On 12/22/2015 03:49 PM, Noah Misch wrote:
...
If the collector entered pgstat_write_statsfile() with more
inquiries waiting in its socket receive buffer, it would ignore
them as being too
On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 07:03:45PM +0100, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> On 12/22/2015 03:49 PM, Noah Misch wrote:
> >On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 06:19:12PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> >>I have pushed it now. Further testing, of course, is always welcome.
> >
> >While investigating stats.sql buildfarm
Hi,
On 12/22/2015 03:49 PM, Noah Misch wrote:
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 06:19:12PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
I have pushed it now. Further testing, of course, is always welcome.
While investigating stats.sql buildfarm failures, mostly on animals axolotl
and shearwater, I found that this
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 06:19:12PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> I have pushed it now. Further testing, of course, is always welcome.
While investigating stats.sql buildfarm failures, mostly on animals axolotl
and shearwater, I found that this patch (commit 187492b) inadvertently removed
the
21 matches
Mail list logo