As pointed out here
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2010-01/msg00145.php
the current zic code doesn't cope gracefully with lack of working
int64. Considering the trouble we've gone to throughout the rest
of the system to support such compilers, it's a bit annoying to
have this little
Tom Lane wrote:
As pointed out here
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2010-01/msg00145.php
the current zic code doesn't cope gracefully with lack of working
int64. Considering the trouble we've gone to throughout the rest
of the system to support such compilers, it's a bit
On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 10:47:33AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
As pointed out here
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2010-01/msg00145.php
the current zic code doesn't cope gracefully with lack of working
int64. Considering the trouble we've gone to throughout the rest of
the system to
David Fetter da...@fetter.org writes:
On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 10:47:33AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
As pointed out here
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2010-01/msg00145.php
the current zic code doesn't cope gracefully with lack of working
int64. Considering the trouble we've gone to
