On Mon, 22 Sep 2008 19:08:16 +0200
Stefan Kaltenbrunner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, cool. Stefan; what's your take on where we're at?
yeah there is a box and a jail I set up a while ago but for various
reasons the actual migration (planning and testing) never happened.
I'm still prepared
On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 8:44 PM, Dimitri Fontaine
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I suppose the plan is to upgrade to a newer GForge. Is it still time to
propose something completely different? I have real good feedbacks about
VHFFS, a perl based clean-room re-implementation of it, if you want to see
Dave Page wrote:
On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 8:37 AM, Joshua D. Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dave Page wrote:
Well that's not strictly true - I persuaded one of the GForge
developers to work on the upgrade. As far as I'm aware, we're still
waiting for the hardware/OS platform to be sorted out
On Sep 22, 2008, at 10:08, Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote:
The machine is ready to go and as far as I know even has a jail.
Stefan
would know more.
OK, cool. Stefan; what's your take on where we're at?
yeah there is a box and a jail I set up a while ago but for various
reasons the actual
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 10:38 PM, Josh Berkus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's kind of what I'm doing now. But I'm wondering if I should
bother with pgFoundry at all. It seems pretty dead (see Josh Berkus's
reply).
Actually, pgFoundry remains extremely popular. Currently, we're getting an
Dave Page wrote:
Well that's not strictly true - I persuaded one of the GForge
developers to work on the upgrade. As far as I'm aware, we're still
waiting for the hardware/OS platform to be sorted out after some
initial problems. I suspect JD will tell me something different though
- that being
On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 8:37 AM, Joshua D. Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dave Page wrote:
Well that's not strictly true - I persuaded one of the GForge
developers to work on the upgrade. As far as I'm aware, we're still
waiting for the hardware/OS platform to be sorted out after some
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Le 20 sept. 08 à 09:42, Dave Page a écrit :
On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 8:37 AM, Joshua D. Drake
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dave Page wrote:
Well that's not strictly true - I persuaded one of the GForge
developers to work on the upgrade. As far
Le jeudi 18 septembre 2008, David E. Wheeler a écrit :
So I'm wondering, given the various discussions of PostgreSQL module
hosting in the past, where would be a good place to put a PostgreSQL
module project? The things I would like to have are:
* SVN or git hosting (I've not used git, but
David E. Wheeler napsal(a):
Howdy,
Overall, it should be easy to find my project, and easy to download it
and build it for PostgreSQL. I've had the following suggestions for
places to try, in addition to pgFoundry:
* github
* Google Code
* LaunchPad
* WebFaction
You can try
On Sep 18, 2008, at 18:43, Robert Treat wrote:
* Google Code
does not offer mailing lists
I get mail for the test-more project there. It's through Google
Groups, which is a little weird, but works.
* LaunchPad
does not offer svn or git, and i think they dont offer a home page
On Sep 18, 2008, at 19:01, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Why not host the code on (say) GitHub, and the rest of the stuff on
pgFoundry?
That's kind of what I'm doing now. But I'm wondering if I should
bother with pgFoundry at all. It seems pretty dead (see Josh Berkus's
reply).
Best,
David
On Sep 19, 2008, at 01:25, Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
There's a french non-profit team offering those:
http://tuxfamily.org/en/main
You can even take their open source hosting facility software and
offer your
own services based on it, and/or extend their perl code to add new
features.
I
On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 11:05:36 -0700
David E. Wheeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* LaunchPad
does not offer svn or git, and i think they dont offer a home page
service
It uses Bazaar. WTF is that? I've never heard of it.
Another git/mecurial/monotone style SCM. It does however allow
On Friday 19 September 2008 14:05:36 David E. Wheeler wrote:
On Sep 18, 2008, at 18:43, Robert Treat wrote:
* Google Code
does not offer mailing lists
I get mail for the test-more project there. It's through Google
Groups, which is a little weird, but works.
I didn't think there was
David E. Wheeler wrote:
On Sep 18, 2008, at 19:01, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Why not host the code on (say) GitHub, and the rest of the stuff on
pgFoundry?
That's kind of what I'm doing now. But I'm wondering if I should
bother with pgFoundry at all. It seems pretty dead (see Josh Berkus's
What about Assembla? http://assembla.com/
[]'s
- Walter
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
That's kind of what I'm doing now. But I'm wondering if I should
bother with pgFoundry at all. It seems pretty dead (see Josh Berkus's
reply).
Actually, pgFoundry remains extremely popular. Currently, we're getting an
average of 2-3 new projects a week.
The issue with pgFoundry is that
Josh Berkus wrote:
That's kind of what I'm doing now. But I'm wondering if I should
bother with pgFoundry at all. It seems pretty dead (see Josh Berkus's
reply).
Actually, pgFoundry remains extremely popular. Currently, we're getting an
average of 2-3 new projects a week.
The
Howdy,
Not *exactly* hackers-related, but I wanted to get a feel for this
from those who are likely to use project hosting, and to minimize the
chances of a flame war.
Right now I have pgTAP on pgFoundry, which is okay, though it appears
to be largely unmaintained. PostgreSQL module
On Thu, 18 Sep 2008 11:22:14 -0700
David E. Wheeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* LaunchPad
Is backed by PostgreSQL. It is the only logical choice :). Seriously
though it is a good service.
Joshua D. Drake
--
The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/
On Sep 18, 2008, at 11:27, Joshua Drake wrote:
* LaunchPad
Is backed by PostgreSQL. It is the only logical choice :). Seriously
though it is a good service.
Looks pretty nice, though it doesn't have project home pages. Having
just created one for pgTAP on pgFoundry, I'd
David,
Right now I have pgTAP on pgFoundry, which is okay, though it appears
to be largely unmaintained. PostgreSQL module projects seem to mainly
just flounder there.
Yeah. We had huge plans for pgFoundry, but got burned out by a combination
of GForge problems and Hub.org problems -- I
On Thursday 18 September 2008 14:22:14 David E. Wheeler wrote:
Howdy,
Not *exactly* hackers-related, but I wanted to get a feel for this
from those who are likely to use project hosting, and to minimize the
chances of a flame war.
Right now I have pgTAP on pgFoundry, which is okay, though
David E. Wheeler wrote:
So I'm wondering, given the various discussions of PostgreSQL module
hosting in the past, where would be a good place to put a PostgreSQL
module project? The things I would like to have are:
* SVN or git hosting (I've not used git, but would try it)
* Ability
25 matches
Mail list logo
