On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 3:38 AM, Thom Brown wrote:
> On 9 November 2011 02:42, Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 8:12 PM, Thom Brown wrote:
>>> Why is this marked as done on with Wiki's todo list?
>>
>> I assume you're referring to this item:
>>
>> --
>> \dd is missing comments for sev
On 9 November 2011 02:42, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 8:12 PM, Thom Brown wrote:
>> Why is this marked as done on with Wiki's todo list?
>
> I assume you're referring to this item:
>
> --
> \dd is missing comments for several types of objects. Comments are
> not handled at all fo
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 8:12 PM, Thom Brown wrote:
> Why is this marked as done on with Wiki's todo list?
I assume you're referring to this item:
--
\dd is missing comments for several types of objects. Comments are
not handled at all for some object types, and are handled by both \dd
and the in
On 17 October 2011 03:04, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 11:12 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 10:20 PM, Josh Kupershmidt
>> wrote:
On the third hand, Josh's previous batch of changes to clean up
psql's behavior in this area are clearly a huge improveme
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 05:04, Robert Haas wrote:
> Hearing no cries of "oh, yes, please", I'm marking this Returned with
> Feedback for now. We can always revisit it if we hear that more
> people want it.
I think this would be an improvement, but it's pretty low on my
wishlist. I haven't checke
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 11:12 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 10:20 PM, Josh Kupershmidt wrote:
>>> On the third hand, Josh's previous batch of changes to clean up
>>> psql's behavior in this area are clearly a huge improvement: you can
>>> now display the comment for nearly anyt
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 10:20 PM, Josh Kupershmidt wrote:
>> On the third hand, Josh's previous batch of changes to clean up
>> psql's behavior in this area are clearly a huge improvement: you can
>> now display the comment for nearly anything by running the appropriate
>> \d command for whatever
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> So, I think the critical question for this patch is "do we want
> this?".
Yep. Or put another way, are the gains worth having another system
view we'll have to maintain forever?
> Tom didn't like it,
In [1], Tom seemed to be mainly angling f
On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 10:11 AM, Josh Kupershmidt wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 7:47 PM, Thom Brown wrote:
>> Just tested this out on current master. I tried this on every object
>> capable of having a comment, and the view reports all of them with the
>> correct details. Doc changes look f
