Re: [HACKERS] redo error?

2003-01-08 Thread Greg Copeland
On Tue, 2003-01-07 at 22:58, Tom Lane wrote: It also logged that it was killed with signal 9, although I didn't kill it! Is there something weird going on here? Is this Linux? The Linux kernel seems to think that killing randomly-chosen processes with SIGKILL is an appropriate response

[HACKERS] redo error?

2003-01-07 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
Hi guys, My postgres totally messed up again for some reason (there were like 3 postmasters running, other weirdness). I noticed this as it was starting up again: 2003-01-07 18:01:34 DEBUG: ReadRecord: unexpected pageaddr 16/F2794000 in log file 22, segment 249, offset 7946240 2003-01-07

Re: [HACKERS] redo error?

2003-01-07 Thread Tom Lane
Christopher Kings-Lynne [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: My postgres totally messed up again for some reason (there were like 3 postmasters running, other weirdness). I noticed this as it was starting up again: 2003-01-07 18:01:34 DEBUG: ReadRecord: unexpected pageaddr 16/F2794000 in log file 22,

Re: [HACKERS] redo error?

2003-01-07 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
It also logged that it was killed with signal 9, although I didn't kill it! Is there something weird going on here? Is this Linux? The Linux kernel seems to think that killing randomly-chosen processes with SIGKILL is an appropriate response to running out of memory. I cannot offhand