Nikolay Shaplov writes:
> [ check-for-ctags-in-make_ctags_v5.diff ]
Pushed with minor editorialization on the wording of the error messages.
regards, tom lane
В письме от воскресенье, 6 января 2019 г. 17:50:36 MSK пользователь Andrew
Dunstan написал:
> > The correct way to code this is to depend on the exit code,
> > not the text output:
> >
> > if command -v etags >/dev/null
> > then
> > : ok
> > else
> > echo etags not found
> > exit 1
> > fi
On 1/6/19 12:16 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> The correct way to code this is to depend on the exit code,
> not the text output:
>
> if command -v etags >/dev/null
> then
> : ok
> else
> echo etags not found
> exit 1
> fi
more succinctly,
command -v etags >/dev/null || { echo etags not
Nikolay Shaplov writes:
> В письме от четверг, 3 января 2019 г. 12:52:36 MSK пользователь Peter
> Eisentraut написал:
>> I don't know how portable command -v is. Some systems have a /bin/sh
>> that is pre-POSIX. Same with $(...).
> Do you know how to obtain such a shell in Debian?
TBH, when
В письме от четверг, 3 января 2019 г. 12:52:36 MSK пользователь Peter
Eisentraut написал:
> >> +1, let's keep it simple. I would just use "ctags/etags not found"
> >> as error message.
> >
> > Actually I was trying to say "Please install 'ctags' [utility] to run
> > make_ctags". But if all of
On 03/01/2019 12:15, Nikolay Shaplov wrote:
>> +1, let's keep it simple. I would just use "ctags/etags not found"
>> as error message.
>
> Actually I was trying to say "Please install 'ctags' [utility] to run
> make_ctags". But if all of you read it as "Please install 'ctags' [package]
> to
>
В письме от четверг, 3 января 2019 г. 10:03:53 MSK пользователь Michael
Paquier написал:
> On Wed, Jan 02, 2019 at 11:35:46AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > In fact, that's demonstrably not so: on my RHEL6 and Fedora boxes,
> > /usr/bin/etags isn't owned by any package, because it's a symlink
> >
On Wed, Jan 02, 2019 at 11:35:46AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> In fact, that's demonstrably not so: on my RHEL6 and Fedora boxes,
> /usr/bin/etags isn't owned by any package, because it's a symlink
> managed by the "alternatives" system. It points to /usr/bin/etags.emacs
> which is owned by the
Peter Eisentraut writes:
> On 01/01/2019 17:44, Nikolay Shaplov wrote:
>> +if [ ! $(command -v ctags) ]
>> +then
>> + echo "'ctags' utility is not found" 1>&2
>> + echo "Please install 'ctags' to run make_ctags" 1>&2
>> + exit 1
>> +fi
> This assumes that the ctags and etags programs are part
On 01/01/2019 17:44, Nikolay Shaplov wrote:
> +if [ ! $(command -v ctags) ]
> +then
> + echo "'ctags' utility is not found" 1>&2
> + echo "Please install 'ctags' to run make_ctags" 1>&2
> + exit 1
> +fi
This assumes that the ctags and etags programs are part of packages of
the same name. I
В письме от вторник, 1 января 2019 г. 11:24:11 MSK пользователь Michael
Paquier написал:
> Not sure if that's something worse bothering about, but you could do
> the same in src/tools/make_etags.
Good idea. Done.
(I did not do it in the first place because I do not use etags and can't
properly
On Mon, Dec 31, 2018 at 07:19:39PM +0300, Nikolay Shaplov wrote:
> В письме от понедельник, 31 декабря 2018 г. 19:04:08 MSK пользователь Nikolay
> Shaplov написал:
>
>> I'd like to propose a small patch for make_ctags script. It checks if ctags
>> utility is intalled or not. If not it reports an
В письме от понедельник, 31 декабря 2018 г. 19:04:08 MSK пользователь Nikolay
Shaplov написал:
> I'd like to propose a small patch for make_ctags script. It checks if ctags
> utility is intalled or not. If not it reports an error and advises to
> install ctags.
Oups. I've misplaced '&' character
13 matches
Mail list logo
