Hi,
Does anybody know PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY is more reliable than
previous versions? I vaguely recall that in the previous
implementation, message sent by NOTIFY may not be reached to listner.
Does PostgreSQL 9.0's new implementation guarantee that the message is
received by the listener?
--
Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@commandprompt.com writes:
Maybe what you should be doing here is that modules should provide
another definition, say EXTENSION, and they have to explicitely define
it in their Makefile (maybe require EXTENSION_VERSION too or something
like that). I think the idea that
Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@commandprompt.com writes:
Hmm. To be honest I don't like the direction that pg_execute_from_file
has taken. (Now that I look, it's been like this since inception). I
have two problems with it: one is that it is #including half the world
into genfile.c. This already
On fre, 2010-10-15 at 22:45 +0200, Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
I suppose people using other editors or tools will come up with other
tricks and tips.
Here is an alternative recipe that I have been using:
(require 'show-wspace)
(add-hook 'font-lock-mode-hook 'show-ws-highlight-hard-spaces)
Hello guys,
The concept of time line makes sense to me in the case of asynchronous
replication. But in case of synchronous replication, I am not so sure.
When a standby connects to the primary, it checks if both have the same time
line. If not, it doesn't start.
Now, consider the following
On ons, 2010-10-13 at 14:32 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
We have a database specification in .pgpass:
hostname:port:database:username:password
What is the purpose of 'database' since username/password combinations
are global, not per database? I would like to documents its purpose.
As a small addition to the pg_hba.conf host name feature, I figured it
would be useful to allow all in the host column, instead of having to
write 0.0.0.0/0 and ::/0. Patch attached.
diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/client-auth.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/client-auth.sgml
index ab96af8..228cfff 100644
---
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 08:45:26PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
But I'm also not sure how far this gets us with KNNGIST, where the
issue is not the typmods but the auxilliary information about the
context of the sort and/or whether this is a sort or qual.
ISTM there are two issues here. With
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 8:41 AM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
As the result of the discussion, I think that we need the following two
parameters for the case where the standby goes down.
* replication_timeout
This is the maximum time to wait for the ACK from the standby. If
On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 3:27 AM, Tatsuo Ishii is...@postgresql.org wrote:
Does anybody know PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY is more reliable than
previous versions? I vaguely recall that in the previous
implementation, message sent by NOTIFY may not be reached to listner.
Does PostgreSQL 9.0's new
Tatsuo Ishii is...@postgresql.org writes:
Does anybody know PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY is more reliable than
previous versions? I vaguely recall that in the previous
implementation, message sent by NOTIFY may not be reached to listner.
Does PostgreSQL 9.0's new implementation guarantee that the
Dimitri Fontaine dimi...@2ndquadrant.fr writes:
Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@commandprompt.com writes:
The other problem is that it's slurping the whole file and executing it
as a single query.
Given some advice, I'll rework that part too. The good news is that it's
well separated from the rest
On 10/16/2010 09:04 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 3:27 AM, Tatsuo Ishiiis...@postgresql.org wrote:
Does anybody know PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY is more reliable than
previous versions? I vaguely recall that in the previous
implementation, message sent by NOTIFY may not be
Oleg as I said I do believe some things could get better in docs.
Here are 4 main drawbacks in my opinion:
1. The docs lack example(s). There are some references to gistproc.c etc but
this is not part of the docs and if I am someone that has just started this
is hard and confusing (I shouldn't
On 13 October 2010 00:28, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Brendan Jurd dire...@gmail.com wrote:
I understand that 'replication' is a keyword as far as the database
name is concerned, but I was surprised to find that it was treated as
a keyword in the
On 17 October 2010 01:52, Brendan Jurd dire...@gmail.com wrote:
Per the above discussion, I've prepared a patch to make keywords in
pg_hba.conf field-specific.
Try New and Improved This Message (tm), now with attachment!
Cheers,
BJ
*** a/src/backend/libpq/hba.c
--- b/src/backend/libpq/hba.c
Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us writes:
I think that's something that could be left for later, if not never.
That's very great news. I'm left with moving the bulk of the code away
from genfile.c and into postgres.c, and have the former be a user
callable shell around the later, I suppose. Right?
On Oct 16, 2010, at 6:56 AM, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
As a small addition to the pg_hba.conf host name feature, I figured it
would be useful to allow all in the host column, instead of having to
write 0.0.0.0/0 and ::/0. Patch attached.
+1. Looks sane on a quick read.
On 16 October 2010 21:56, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
As a small addition to the pg_hba.conf host name feature, I figured it
would be useful to allow all in the host column, instead of having to
write 0.0.0.0/0 and ::/0. Patch attached.
Cool. And, for what it's worth, this
Excerpts from Marios Vodas's message of sáb oct 16 11:11:52 -0300 2010:
4. Why not add some images/figures? (1 image = 1000 words)
I can answer this: the reason is that we haven't settled on a
technology for producing figures. There's a thread about it, but no
consensus.
--
Álvaro Herrera
Excerpts from Brendan Jurd's message of sáb oct 16 11:53:31 -0300 2010:
On 17 October 2010 01:52, Brendan Jurd dire...@gmail.com wrote:
Per the above discussion, I've prepared a patch to make keywords in
pg_hba.conf field-specific.
Try New and Improved This Message (tm), now with
On 17 October 2010 02:27, Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@commandprompt.com wrote:
Hmm. Would it be possible to list keywords _applicable_ to each field,
and have these passed down to next_token by the caller instead? This
seems backwards, but I'm not sure if the other way is really workable.
Short
(And, if we are going to break everything
in sight, now would be a good time to think about changing typmod to
something more flexible than one int32.)
As someone who is jamming geometry type, spatial reference number and
dimensionality into said 32bit typmod, let me say emphatically ...
--On 16. Oktober 2010 12:35:06 +0300 Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net
wrote:
Maybe it should go in src/tools/editors/emacs.samples, too?
Yeah, I think we should recommend some way to highlight faulty
whitespace.
The problem is, after you turn it on, it will make you cry as you
realize
Hi all -
I independently started some work on a similar capability as was contributed
back in August by Joey Adams for a json datatype. Before starting, I did a
quick search but for some reason didn't turn this existing thread up.
What I've been working on is out on github for now:
On lör, 2010-10-16 at 09:23 -0700, Paul Ramsey wrote:
(And, if we are going to break everything
in sight, now would be a good time to think about changing typmod to
something more flexible than one int32.)
As someone who is jamming geometry type, spatial reference number and
On 10/15/2010 04:33 AM, Dean Rasheed wrote:
I started looking at this last night, but ran out of time. I'll
continue this evening / over the weekend.
Continuing my review of this patch...
Usability review
What the patch does:
This patch adds syntax to allow additional enum
Marios,
you're right. There are several reasons for poor documentation, but of course,
no excuse, we do need good docs any way ! It's very nice you're willing to
write one, since it's always better seen from outside of development.
I think it'd be better to use wiki, so other people can join.
Dimitri Fontaine dimi...@2ndquadrant.fr writes:
That's very great news. I'm left with moving the bulk of the code away
from genfile.c and into postgres.c, and have the former be a user
callable shell around the later, I suppose. Right?
Here it is, looks much better this way.
Regards,
--
2010/10/17 Terry Laurenzo t...@laurenzo.org:
Hi all -
I independently started some work on a similar capability as was contributed
back in August by Joey Adams for a json datatype. Before starting, I did a
quick search but for some reason didn't turn this existing thread up.
What I've been
On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 10:17 AM, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
On lör, 2010-10-16 at 09:23 -0700, Paul Ramsey wrote:
(And, if we are going to break everything
in sight, now would be a good time to think about changing typmod to
something more flexible than one int32.)
As
Dimitri Fontaine dimi...@2ndquadrant.fr writes:
Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us writes:
I think that's something that could be left for later, if not never.
That's very great news. I'm left with moving the bulk of the code away
from genfile.c and into postgres.c, and have the former be a user
Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@commandprompt.com writes:
Excerpts from Brendan Jurd's message of sáb oct 16 11:53:31 -0300 2010:
Try New and Improved This Message (tm), now with attachment!
Hmm. Would it be possible to list keywords _applicable_ to each field,
and have these passed down to
Brendan Jurd dire...@gmail.com writes:
Full answer: The problem is that pg_hba.conf doesn't have a fixed
structure. Each line can be 4, 5 or 6 fields (not including the final
'options' field) long, and which of these structures apply to any
given line isn't decided until parse_hba_line goes
On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 3:27 AM, Tatsuo Ishii is...@postgresql.org wrote:
Does anybody know PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY is more reliable than
previous versions? ,A (BI vaguely recall that in the previous
implementation, message sent by NOTIFY may not be reached to listner.
Does PostgreSQL
On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 6:13 PM, Paul Ramsey pram...@cleverelephant.ca wrote:
On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 10:17 AM, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
On lör, 2010-10-16 at 09:23 -0700, Paul Ramsey wrote:
(And, if we are going to break everything
in sight, now would be a good time to
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 7:35 PM, Tatsuo Ishii is...@postgresql.org wrote:
What new public interfaces do you think are needed for 9.1 in this
regard?
At this point I'm thinking of modifying existing pg_is_in_recovery(),
thus 0 new public interface.
pg_is_in_recovery() returns a bool, are
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 9:39 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 8:45 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 8:10 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Perhaps we should think of pg_amop not so much
as a way to tell the AM what to
Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of sáb oct 16 19:52:27 -0300 2010:
Dimitri Fontaine dimi...@2ndquadrant.fr writes:
Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us writes:
I think that's something that could be left for later, if not never.
That's very great news. I'm left with moving the bulk of the code
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 2:59 PM, Dmitriy Igrishin dmit...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there way to determine failed connection attempt due to invalid
authorization (libpq)?
I think this question would be more appropriate on pgsql-general. I
suppose you would have to look at PQerrorMessage().
--
Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@commandprompt.com writes:
The intent here is to execute some code from the file directly inside
the server.
Eh, I realize now that the right way to go about this is to use SPI.
Yeah, that would be one way to go about it. But IMO postgres.c should
be solely concerned
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 7:10 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
I still feel vaguely uneasy about the fact that the proposed patch
can't handle ASC/DESC or NULLS FIRST/LAST, and that unease grew a bit
more last night when I read Peter's patch to
Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of sáb oct 16 23:32:49 -0300 2010:
Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@commandprompt.com writes:
The intent here is to execute some code from the file directly inside
the server.
Eh, I realize now that the right way to go about this is to use SPI.
Yeah, that would
Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of mar oct 12 20:49:28 -0300 2010:
Marko Tiikkaja marko.tiikk...@cs.helsinki.fi writes:
On 2010-10-13 2:10 AM +0300, Tom Lane wrote:
BTW, this patch seems to be also the time to remove the AtStart_Cache()
call in CommandCounterIncrement, as foreseen in the
On 17 October 2010 09:59, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Brendan Jurd dire...@gmail.com writes:
At the time that next_token gets called, we have no way of knowing
which field is currently being tokenised, at least not without doing
some serious rearrangement of hba.c, so that it tokenises
45 matches
Mail list logo
