Hi folks,
I was working on a little docs patch today, and when I tried to
`make`, openjade choked on an identifier in information_schema.sgml,
which is very much unrelated to my changes:
openjade:information_schema.sgml:828:60:Q: length of name token must
not exceed NAMELEN (44)
Here is a
On 31.05.2011 07:46, Jun Ishiduka wrote:
I don't much like that approach. The standby would need to be able to
write the backup history file to the archive at the end of backup, and
we'd have to reintroduce the code to fetch it from archive and, when
streaming, from the master. At the moment,
On 30.05.2011 21:51, Nick Raj wrote:
Hi,
Cube code provided by postgres contrib folder. It uses the NDBOX structure.
On creating index, it's size increase at a high rate.
On inserting some tuple and creating indexes its behaviour is shown below.
1. When there is only one tuple
select
I think
we need a detailed design document for how this is all going to work.
We need to not only handle the master properly but also handle the
slave properly. Consider, for example, the case where the slave
begins to replay the transaction, reaches a restartpoint after
replaying some
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 9:45 AM, Gaetano Giunta
giunta.gaet...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello
I would like to know what is the process to get new applications accepted
for inclusion in the stack builder (namely the eZ Publish cms).
I would be ready spend some time to package the application
On mån, 2011-05-30 at 22:43 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
One of the conclusions the study group came to was that there should
be good integration between the tracker system and the SCM. That was
in the days before distributed SCMs were common, and in a commercial
context, so I'm not sure how
On mån, 2011-05-30 at 21:52 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
The number of people reading and replying to
emails on pgsql-bugs is already insufficient, perhaps because of the
(incorrect) perception that Tom does or will fix everything and no one
else needs to care. So anything that makes it harder
On 31.05.2011 01:07, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
In gist_box_penalty function floating point error in line
*result = (float) (size_box(ud) - size_box(origentry-key));
sometimes makes *result a very small negative number.
I beleive that best place to fix it is gistpenalty function. The attached
On mån, 2011-05-30 at 20:16 -0400, Christopher Browne wrote:
My suspicion is that RT may be rather a lot heavier weight in terms of
how it would have to affect process than people would be happy with.
What has been pretty clearly expressed is that various of the
developers prefer for the
On mån, 2011-05-30 at 21:52 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
I have used RT and I found that the
web interface was both difficult to use and unwieldly for tickets
containing large numbers of messages. Maybe those those things have
been improved, but frankly if RT or Bugzilla is the best we can come
On 31.05.2011 05:16, Tom Lane wrote:
Tomasz Chmielewskiman...@wpkg.org writes:
bookstor=# SELECT 1 FROM core_wot_seq FOR UPDATE;
Um ... why are you doing that on a sequence?
ERROR: could not access status of transaction 1573786613
DETAIL: Could not open file pg_clog/05DC: No such file or
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 07:42, Greg Stark gsst...@mit.edu wrote:
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 10:09 PM, Stefan Kaltenbrunner
ste...@kaltenbrunner.cc wrote:
well bugzilla has an inbound email interface as well that can both be
used to creande and to manipulate bugs (as in mails that have the
bug-id
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 07:08, Stefan Kaltenbrunner
ste...@kaltenbrunner.cc wrote:
On 05/31/2011 05:42 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Kim Bisgaard kim...@alleroedderne.adsl.dk writes:
On 2011-05-30 04:26, Greg Stark wrote:
My biggest gripe about bugzilla was that it sent you an email with updates
to
On mån, 2011-05-30 at 22:17 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Christopher Browne cbbro...@gmail.com writes:
On 2011-05-30 4:31 PM, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
Based on that, and past discussions, and things we've tried in the past,
and gut feeling, and so on, it looks like Request Tracker
2011/5/31 Heikki Linnakangas heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com:
On 31.05.2011 07:46, Jun Ishiduka wrote:
I don't much like that approach. The standby would need to be able to
write the backup history file to the archive at the end of backup, and
we'd have to reintroduce the code to fetch it
On mån, 2011-05-30 at 01:30 -0400, Greg Smith wrote:
Greg Stark is right that Debbugs has a lot of interesting features
similar to the desired workflow here. It's not tied to just Debian
anymore; the GNU project is also using it now.
For the benefit of others, I suppose you are referring
2011/5/30, Nick Raj nickrajj...@gmail.com:
3. When tuples are 5 lakh
For the benefit of the others: 5 lakh seems to mean 500,000.
URL:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lakh
Nicolas
--
A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion.
Q. Why is top posting bad?
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers
On tis, 2011-05-31 at 10:36 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
I get the feeling we're approaching this backwards. Wouldn't the
normal way to do it be to define the workflow we *want*, and then
figure out which bugtracker works for that or requires the least
changes for that, rather than to try to
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 12:06 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com wrote:
The documentation should be fixed too.
Patch with documentation fix is attached.
I tried to reproduce this problem on another computer with Windows, but
problem doesn't occurs. So, seems that it
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 11:47, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
On tis, 2011-05-31 at 10:36 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
I get the feeling we're approaching this backwards. Wouldn't the
normal way to do it be to define the workflow we *want*, and then
figure out which bugtracker works
From: Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com
It might be useful, in this situation, for the OP to add this patch to
the CommitFest application.
https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/commitfest_view/open
Greg Smith g...@2ndquadrant.com wrote in message
news:4de1a8e7.1030...@2ndquadrant.com...
On 05/31/2011 06:41 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
We already have a search system that works reasonably well for the archives...
I trust this weas a piece of sarcasm. I spoke to more than a few people
at pgcon and nobody had a good word to say about the search system on
the archives.
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 14:44, Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net wrote:
On 05/31/2011 06:41 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
We already have a search system that works reasonably well for the
archives...
I trust this weas a piece of sarcasm. I spoke to more than a few people at
pgcon and
On 05/31/2011 04:01 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On mån, 2011-05-30 at 22:43 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
One of the conclusions the study group came to was that there should
be good integration between the tracker system and the SCM. That was
in the days before distributed SCMs were common,
On tis, 2011-05-31 at 08:44 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
On 05/31/2011 06:41 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
We already have a search system that works reasonably well for the
archives...
I trust this weas a piece of sarcasm. I spoke to more than a few people
at pgcon and nobody had a
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 3:35 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 1:44 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 8:27 AM, Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
Design seemed relatively easy from
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 15:07, Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net wrote:
On 05/31/2011 04:01 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On mån, 2011-05-30 at 22:43 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
One of the conclusions the study group came to was that there should
be good integration between the tracker
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 4:12 AM, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
On mån, 2011-05-30 at 21:52 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
I have used RT and I found that the
web interface was both difficult to use and unwieldly for tickets
containing large numbers of messages. Maybe those those things
Tomasz Chmielewski man...@wpkg.org writes:
On 31.05.2011 05:16, Tom Lane wrote:
I think the most appropriate solution may be to disallow SELECT FOR
UPDATE/SHARE on sequences ... so if you have a good reason why we
shouldn't do so, please explain it.
I grepped the sources of the application
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 4:36 AM, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
I get the feeling we're approaching this backwards. Wouldn't the
normal way to do it be to define the workflow we *want*, and then
figure out which bugtracker works for that or requires the least
changes for that,
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 02:58:02PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 14:44, Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net wrote:
On 05/31/2011 06:41 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
We already have a search system that works reasonably well for the
archives...
I trust this
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 9:22 AM, Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
The basis for this is that weak locks do not conflict with each other,
whereas strong locks conflict with both strong and weak locks.
(There's a couple of special cases which I ignore for now).
(Using Robert's
On 05/30/2011 07:57 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
I've applied patches to fix Martin Pitt's report of peer auth failing on
FreeBSD-amd64 kernels. I tested it with FreeBSD but do not have the
resources to check every other platform that uses the same code branch
in auth_peer. The buildfarm will soon
On 05/31/2011 09:33 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
IIRC, both of them think that you should log into the web interface to
send emails (which, in the case of Bugzilla, don't permit replies),
rather than sending emails that show up in the web interface.
I think you probably need to look at Bugzilla
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 4:36 AM, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
So in order to start a brand new bikeshed to paint on, have we even
considered a very trivial workflow like letting the bugtracker
actually *only* track our existing lists and
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 09:33:33AM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 4:12 AM, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
On mån, 2011-05-30 at 21:52 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
I have used RT and I found that the
web interface was both difficult to use and unwieldly for tickets
Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net writes:
On 05/31/2011 06:41 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
We already have a search system that works reasonably well for the
archives...
I trust this weas a piece of sarcasm. I spoke to more than a few people
at pgcon and nobody had a good word to say about
On May 26, 2011, at 12:41 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Yes, I think the lock-up is better than weird behavior. Maybe we should
add a short note in a postgresql.conf comment to this effect, so that it
doesn't surprise anyone that deletes or comments out the line.
+1 on both counts.
--
Jim C.
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 16:21, Kevin Grittner
kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov wrote:
k...@rice.edu k...@rice.edu wrote:
maybe we can do some tweaking our search engine to improve it.
A custom dictionary to carefully add a few synonyms might go a long
way. I often need to try a number of
k...@rice.edu k...@rice.edu wrote:
maybe we can do some tweaking our search engine to improve it.
A custom dictionary to carefully add a few synonyms might go a long
way. I often need to try a number of permutations of likely words
to get relevant hits.
Including the subject line in
Sorry for the self-reply but I figured it'd be helpful to add information
that I discovered only after my initial post.
On May30, 2011, at 15:17 , Florian Pflug wrote:
The XPath expression 'name(/*)', for example, is supposed to return 'root'
when applied to the XML fragment
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 09:36:00AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net writes:
On 05/31/2011 06:41 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
We already have a search system that works reasonably well for the
archives...
I trust this weas a piece of sarcasm. I spoke to more than
Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
Any patches are definitely welcome - you can find the search
system at
https://pgweb.postgresql.org/browser/trunk/portal/tools/search
:-)
(for the archives, you're probably most interested in
classes/ArchiveIndexer.class.php and the
On 05/31/2011 04:36 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
So in order to start a brand new bikeshed to paint on, have we even
considered a very trivial workflow like letting the bugtracker
actually *only* track our existing lists and archives. That would
mean:
* Mailing lists are *primary*, and the
Tomasz Chmielewski man...@wpkg.org writes:
On 31.05.2011 05:16, Tom Lane wrote:
I think the most appropriate solution may be to disallow SELECT FOR
UPDATE/SHARE on sequences ... so if you have a good reason why we
shouldn't do so, please explain it.
I grepped the sources of the application
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 10:02 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 4:36 AM, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
So in order to start a brand new bikeshed to paint on, have we even
considered a very trivial workflow like
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 9:59 AM, Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net wrote:
On 05/31/2011 09:33 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
IIRC, both of them think that you should log into the web interface to
send emails (which, in the case of Bugzilla, don't permit replies),
rather than sending emails that show
Excerpts from Brendan Jurd's message of mar may 31 02:17:22 -0400 2011:
Hi folks,
I was working on a little docs patch today, and when I tried to
`make`, openjade choked on an identifier in information_schema.sgml,
which is very much unrelated to my changes:
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 4:39 AM, nil nil unprecedente...@yahoo.com wrote:
Sir,
i am developing a patch for postgresql in c language. i want to
know that how can i integrate my patch with postgresql.
regards
emman
This might be a good place to start:
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 4:53 AM, nil nil unprecedente...@yahoo.com wrote:
sir,
i am developnig a patch and as per instructionsdescribed on this
site http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Developer_FAQ it is specifed on the
link that along with unix platform we have to use GCC, GNU
Make,
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 3:39 AM, Leonardo Francalanci m_li...@yahoo.it wrote:
I think
we need a detailed design document for how this is all going to work.
We need to not only handle the master properly but also handle the
slave properly. Consider, for example, the case where the slave
Excerpts from Joe Abbate's message of mar may 31 10:43:07 -0400 2011:
I have a web crawler for a website I maintain that I could modify to
crawl through the archives of -bugs, say from 5 Dec 2003 where the first
bug with the new format appears, and capture the structured data
(reference,
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 3:22 PM, Alvaro Herrera
alvhe...@commandprompt.com wrote:
Excerpts from Brendan Jurd's message of mar may 31 02:17:22 -0400 2011:
Hi folks,
I was working on a little docs patch today, and when I tried to
`make`, openjade choked on an identifier in
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 10:02 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
I kinda wonder why the CF app doesn't work like that, actually.
(Yeah, I know the poor thread linking in the archives is an issue.)
I thought this pretty much WAS how the CF app
This patch allows you to initially declare a CHECK constraint as NOT
VALID, similar to what we already allow for foreign keys. That is, you
create the constraint without scanning the table and after it is
committed, it is enforced for new rows; later, all rows are checked by
running ALTER TABLE
Christopher Browne cbbro...@gmail.com writes:
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 3:22 PM, Alvaro Herrera
alvhe...@commandprompt.com wrote:
Excerpts from Brendan Jurd's message of mar may 31 02:17:22 -0400 2011:
openjade:information_schema.sgml:828:60:Q: length of name token must
not exceed NAMELEN (44)
Hola Alvaro,
On 05/31/2011 11:38 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
I think this would be easier if you crawled the monthly mboxen instead
of the web archives. It'd be preferable to use message-ids to identify
messages rather than year-and-month based URLs.
I can capture the message-ids, as well as
On 30.05.2011 17:21, Tom Lane wrote:
Heikki Linnakangasheikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com writes:
I think we can work around both of those by just saving and restoring
the value of each Param that we set while evaluating an expression,
Huh? That's a waste of time and effort. Just make
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 12:01 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 10:02 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
I kinda wonder why the CF app doesn't work like that, actually.
(Yeah, I know the poor thread linking in the
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 11:04 AM, Alvaro Herrera
alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org wrote:
This patch allows you to initially declare a CHECK constraint as NOT
VALID
seems you forgot to add the patch itself
--
Jaime Casanova www.2ndQuadrant.com
Professional PostgreSQL: Soporte y capacitación de
I wrote:
BTW, after looking more closely at the buildfarm configure logs, it
appears that both OpenBSD and NetBSD have getpeereid(), which means
that they don't use this code at all. It is currently looking to me
like the HAVE_STRUCT_FCRED and HAVE_STRUCT_SOCKCRED variants are dead
code.
Joe Abbate j...@freedomcircle.com wrote:
I assume a link such as
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2003-12/msg00046.php
would be easier to follow than
20031205173035.ga16...@wolff.to
The point is that the community seems to have reached a consensus
that they would rather use
Excerpts from Kevin Grittner's message of mar may 31 12:41:59 -0400 2011:
Joe Abbate j...@freedomcircle.com wrote:
I assume a link such as
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2003-12/msg00046.php
would be easier to follow than
20031205173035.ga16...@wolff.to
The
Excerpts from Alvaro Herrera's message of mar may 31 12:39:48 -0400 2011:
Excerpts from Jaime Casanova's message of mar may 31 12:24:09 -0400 2011:
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 11:04 AM, Alvaro Herrera
alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org wrote:
This patch allows you to initially declare a CHECK constraint
Excerpts from Jaime Casanova's message of mar may 31 12:24:09 -0400 2011:
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 11:04 AM, Alvaro Herrera
alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org wrote:
This patch allows you to initially declare a CHECK constraint as NOT
VALID
seems you forgot to add the patch itself
oops ... another
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 04:19:29PM +0200, Florian Pflug wrote:
Sorry for the self-reply but I figured it'd be helpful to add information
that I discovered only after my initial post.
On May30, 2011, at 15:17 , Florian Pflug wrote:
The XPath expression 'name(/*)', for example, is supposed to
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 12:04 PM, Alvaro Herrera
alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org wrote:
This patch allows you to initially declare a CHECK constraint as NOT
VALID, similar to what we already allow for foreign keys. That is, you
create the constraint without scanning the table and after it is
On 05/31/2011 01:12 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On mån, 2011-05-30 at 21:52 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
I have used RT and I found that the
web interface was both difficult to use and unwieldly for tickets
containing large numbers of messages. Maybe those those things have
been improved, but
Well, I sort of assumed the design was OK, too, but the more we talk
about this WAL-logging stuff, the less convinced I am that I really
understand the problem. :-(
I see. In fact, I think nobody thought about restart points...
To sum up:
1) everything seems ok when in the wal_level =
Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org wrote:
This patch allows you to initially declare a CHECK constraint as
NOT VALID, similar to what we already allow for foreign keys.
That is, you create the constraint without scanning the table and
after it is committed, it is enforced for new rows;
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 19:10, Joe Abbate j...@freedomcircle.com wrote:
On 05/31/2011 12:41 PM, Kevin Grittner wrote:
The point is that the community seems to have reached a consensus
that they would rather use this URL for the above message:
On tis, 2011-05-31 at 14:58 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
But sure, it can probably be improved. But what people are then
basically asying is that tsearch isn't good enough for searching.
For one thing, there should be more structured search possibilities,
such as by date or author or subject
Here it is -- as a context patch this time, as well.
--
Álvaro Herrera alvhe...@commandprompt.com
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
0001-Enable-CHECK-constraints-to-be-declared-NOT-VALID.patch
Description: Binary
On 05/31/2011 12:41 PM, Kevin Grittner wrote:
The point is that the community seems to have reached a consensus
that they would rather use this URL for the above message:
http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/20031205173035.ga16...@wolff.to
OK, as I said, I can still capture the
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 11:35:01AM -0500, Kevin Grittner wrote:
Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org wrote:
This patch allows you to initially declare a CHECK constraint as
NOT VALID, similar to what we already allow for foreign keys.
That is, you create the constraint without
Excerpts from Joshua D. Drake's message of mar may 31 12:32:43 -0400 2011:
Given that you have been one of the people calling for a bug tracker,
and these are the two most widely used systems available, what's wrong
with them and what else would you suggest?
Just FYI, CMD uses redmine
On 05/31/2011 01:13 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
Just to be clear, crawling the current archives for this info is
probably the easiest part of the whole project. In fact, the majority
of the information you'd need is *already* in a postgresql database on
search.postgresql.org.
Does that
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 4:05 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net writes:
That doesn't mean that better integration cannot be worked on later, but
this illusion that a bug tracker must have magical total awareness of
the entire flow of information in the
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 19:59, Joe Abbate j...@freedomcircle.com wrote:
On 05/31/2011 01:13 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
Just to be clear, crawling the current archives for this info is
probably the easiest part of the whole project. In fact, the majority
of the information you'd need is
On 05/31/2011 11:05 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Excerpts from Joshua D. Drake's message of mar may 31 12:32:43 -0400 2011:
Given that you have been one of the people calling for a bug tracker,
and these are the two most widely used systems available, what's wrong
with them and what else would
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 19:37, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
On tis, 2011-05-31 at 14:58 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
But sure, it can probably be improved. But what people are then
basically asying is that tsearch isn't good enough for searching.
For one thing, there should be
Hi
While trying to figure out sensible semantics for XPATH() and scalar-value
returning XPath expressions, I've stumbled upon a bug in XPATH() that allows
invalid XML values to be produced. This is a serious problem because should
such invalid values get inserted into an XML column, an
2011/5/31 Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@commandprompt.com:
Excerpts from Joshua D. Drake's message of mar may 31 12:32:43 -0400 2011:
Alvaro has also brought up the system that Debian uses which is actually
email based versus web based.
Yeah, that's debbugs, which has been mentioned elsewhere in
On May31, 2011, at 19:15 , Ross J. Reedstrom wrote:
What you describe, making XPATH return something for the scalar
functions, is sorely needed. Constraining the return values to be valid
XML fragments is the sort of wart that makes XML processing in
postgresql seem odd to those familiar with
On tis, 2011-05-31 at 11:59 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
However, FreeBSD does have, and Debian/kFreeBSD does expose,
getsockopt(LOCAL_PEERCRED), which turns out to be functionally
equivalent to SO_PEERCRED: in particular, you can just call it and get
the answer without having to fool with getting
Excerpts from Ross J. Reedstrom's message of mar may 31 14:02:04 -0400 2011:
Follows from one of the practical maxims of databases: The data is
always dirty Being able to have the constraints enforced at least for
new data allows you to at least fence the bad data, and have a shot at
fixing
Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@commandprompt.com writes:
Excerpts from Kevin Grittner's message of mar may 31 12:41:59 -0400 2011:
The point is that the community seems to have reached a consensus
that they would rather use this URL for the above message:
On tis, 2011-05-31 at 12:13 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Christopher Browne cbbro...@gmail.com writes:
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 3:22 PM, Alvaro Herrera
alvhe...@commandprompt.com wrote:
Excerpts from Brendan Jurd's message of mar may 31 02:17:22 -0400 2011:
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 12:38 PM, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
So what I'm now thinking is we should rip out the control-message
implementation altogether, and instead use LOCAL_PEERCRED. This is
probably not something to back-patch, but it would make things a lot
cleaner going
All,
Let me mention some of the reasons we as a project could use a bug
tracker which have nothing to do with actually fixing bugs.
(1) Testing: a bug tracker could be used for beta testing instead of the
ad-hoc system I'm writing. Assuming it has the right features, of course.
(2) User
On 05/31/2011 04:36 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
But it seems like no one else has seen this problem yet, so it's quite
suspicious, since surely people have built the documentation in the last
few months.
I have two buildfarm members with stock openjade/docbook installations
building the
Greg Stark gsst...@mit.edu writes:
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 12:38 PM, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
Oh yes, no point in having complicated code that doesn't get exercised.
This does amount to desupporting old versions of those OSes in newer
versions of Postgres, at least for this one
Hello
here is a partial review of your patch, better than keeping it
sleeping in the commitfest queue I hope.
Submission review
* The patch is not in context diff format.
* The patch apply, but contains some extra whitespace.
* Documentation is here but not
Excerpts from Dimitri Fontaine's message of mar may 31 16:11:35 -0400 2011:
Check out the following POC, which needs to get migrated into a django
application for the upcoming new infrastructure:
http://archives.beccati.org/
It uses AOX (http://aox.org/) and as such is baked by a
Hello,
Is there any way to retrieve the actual variable names (as were given
during Stored Procedure definition) for the corresponding var_ids in
pl/plpgsql/src/pl_exec.c ?
I have modified some PostgreSQL code for my own project and I track some
information for functions during their
Excerpts from Josh Berkus's message of mar may 31 17:05:23 -0400 2011:
BTW, we talked to Debian about debbugs ages ago, and the Debian project
said that far too much of debbugs was not portable to other projects.
The good news is that the GNU folk proved them wrong, as evidenced
elsewhere in
2011/5/31 Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com:
All,
Let me mention some of the reasons we as a project could use a bug
tracker which have nothing to do with actually fixing bugs.
(1) Testing: a bug tracker could be used for beta testing instead of the
ad-hoc system I'm writing. Assuming it has
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 12:22 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Greg Stark gsst...@mit.edu writes:
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 12:38 PM, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
Oh yes, no point in having complicated code that doesn't get exercised.
This does amount to desupporting old
Marko Kreen mark...@gmail.com writes:
My suggestion would be to use getpeereid() everywhere.
And just have compat getpeereid() implementation on non-BSD
platforms. This would minimize ifdeffery in core core.
Hm, maybe. I'd be for this if we had more than two call sites, but
as things stand
2011/5/31, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us:
Unless maybe there's a kFreeBSD-like project out there with NetBSD as
the kernel?)
There used to be an attempt by Debian (called GNU/NetBSD), but that
has since long been abandoned. I don't know of any other similar
projects.
1 - 100 of 133 matches
Mail list logo
