On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 12:02 AM, Jim Nasby j...@nasby.net wrote:
It's damn annoying... enough so that I'd personally be in favor of creating a
pid column that has the same data so we can deprecate
procpid and eventually remove it...
well, if we will start changing bad picked names we will
On 1 June 2011 23:47, Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@commandprompt.com wrote:
Here's a complete patch with all this stuff, plus doc additions and
simple regression tests for the new ALTER DOMAIN commands.
Enable CHECK constraints to be declared NOT VALID
This means that they can initially be
On 11 June 2011 14:32, Dean Rasheed dean.a.rash...@gmail.com wrote:
On 1 June 2011 23:47, Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@commandprompt.com wrote:
Here's a complete patch with all this stuff, plus doc additions and
simple regression tests for the new ALTER DOMAIN commands.
Enable CHECK
On 11 June 2011 14:40, Thom Brown t...@linux.com wrote:
On 11 June 2011 14:32, Dean Rasheed dean.a.rash...@gmail.com wrote:
On 1 June 2011 23:47, Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@commandprompt.com wrote:
Here's a complete patch with all this stuff, plus doc additions and
simple regression tests for
On 11 June 2011 16:40, Dean Rasheed dean.a.rash...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11 June 2011 14:40, Thom Brown t...@linux.com wrote:
On 11 June 2011 14:32, Dean Rasheed dean.a.rash...@gmail.com wrote:
On 1 June 2011 23:47, Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@commandprompt.com wrote:
Here's a complete patch with
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
For the directory name, I'd prefer either src/extensions (since there is
more than one), or if you want to go for short somehow, src/ext. (Hmm,
I guess the installation subdirectory is also called extension. But
it felt wrong on first reading anyway.)
I jumped
Please remember to double-patch anything that should go into 9.1.
For the record, the correct formula seems to be
$ git pull
Current branch master is up to date.
$ git push origin master:refs/heads/REL9_1_STABLE
Total 0 (delta 0), reused 0 (delta 0)
To
On 6/11/2011 1:02 AM, Jaime Casanova wrote:
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 12:02 AM, Jim Nasbyj...@nasby.net wrote:
It's damn annoying... enough so that I'd personally be in favor of creating a
pid column that has the same data so we can deprecate
procpid and eventually remove it...
well, if we
Noah Misch n...@leadboat.com writes:
We originally discussed having the transform function take and return Expr
nodes. It turns out that simplify_function() does not have the Expr, probably
because the particular choice of node type among the many that can convey a
function call does not
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 02:11:55PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Noah Misch n...@leadboat.com writes:
We originally discussed having the transform function take and return Expr
nodes. It turns out that simplify_function() does not have the Expr,
probably
because the particular choice of node
Dan Ports wrote:
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 09:43:58PM +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
Do checks such as that argue for keeping the volatile flag, or do
you think we can drop it if we make those changes? (That would
also allow dropping a number of casts which exist just to avoid
warnings.)
Noah Misch n...@leadboat.com writes:
Good points. I'm thinking, then, add an Expr argument to simplify_function()
and have the CoerceViaIO branch of eval_const_expressions_mutator() pass NULL
for both its simplify_function() calls. If simplify_function() gets a NULL
Expr
for a function
On 2011-06-11 01:57, Tom Lane wrote:
(5) Lobby your libc providers to make strtod accept denormals without
throwing ERANGE. There is no obvious reason why it shouldn't. (On at
least one of my boxes, it does.)
The standard either explicitly allows or requires this behaviour
(depending on
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 7:04 PM, Greg Smith g...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On 05/29/2011 03:11 PM, Jeff Janes wrote:
If you use pgbench -S -M prepared at a scale where all data fits in
memory, most of what you are benchmarking is network/IPC chatter, and
table locking.
If you profile it,
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 01:38:31PM -0500, Kevin Grittner wrote:
I'm not concerned about references covered by
SerializableXactHashLock. I am more concerned about some of the
tests for whether the (MySerializableXact == InvalidSerializableXact)
checks and any other tests not covered by that
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
On 6/11/2011 1:02 AM, Jaime Casanova wrote:
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 12:02 AM, Jim Nasbyj...@nasby.net wrote:
It's damn annoying... enough so that I'd personally be in favor of
creating a pid column that has the same data so we can deprecate
procpid and eventually
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 03:03:18PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Noah Misch n...@leadboat.com writes:
Good points. I'm thinking, then, add an Expr argument to
simplify_function()
and have the CoerceViaIO branch of eval_const_expressions_mutator() pass
NULL
for both its simplify_function()
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 04:48:26PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 2:29 PM, Noah Misch n...@leadboat.com wrote:
It's actually not
clear to me what the user could usefully do other than trying to
preserve his transaction by setting a high deadlock_timeout - what is
the
Greg Smith wrote:
On 06/10/2011 12:19 AM, Alex Hunsaker wrote:
It looks like if you push the remote branch first everything should work
nicely:
git checkout master
git push origin origin:refs/heads/REL9_1_STABLE
git fetch # fetch the new branch
git checkout REL9_1_STABLE
This is
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 11:10 AM, Noah Misch n...@leadboat.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 10:22:59PM -0400, Noah Misch wrote:
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 01:56:22PM +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
On 12.03.2011 12:40, Noah Misch wrote:
The installation that inspired my original report
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Jaime Casanova ja...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
on shdepReassignOwned() we have this message, which is obviously wrong
we are not dropping objects just reassigning them...
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_DEPENDENT_OBJECTS_STILL_EXIST),
On 6/11/2011 1:23 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
There is a difference between a project name and something that directly
affects usability. +1 on fixing this. IMO, we don't create a new pid
column, we just fix the problem. If we do it for 9.2, we have 18 months
to communicate the change.
Uh, I am
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 10:39 AM, Martin Pihlak martin.pih...@gmail.com wrote:
In PQputCopyData #2 it is visible that the first SSL_write called from
pqFlush failed with SSL_ERROR_WANT_WRITE. The next SSL_write should
have been a retry with the same parameters, but instead was passed a
buffer
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 9:15 PM, Joshua D. Drake j...@commandprompt.com wrote:
On 6/11/2011 1:23 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
There is a difference between a project name and something that directly
affects usability. +1 on fixing this. IMO, we don't create a new pid
column, we just fix the
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 3:09 PM, Kohei KaiGai kai...@kaigai.gr.jp wrote:
Here is two level lookups.
The first is from object identifiers to security label; it can be boosted
using syscache mechanism. The second is from security labels to
access control decision; it can be boosted using
2011/6/12 Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com:
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 9:15 PM, Joshua D. Drake j...@commandprompt.com
wrote:
On 6/11/2011 1:23 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
There is a difference between a project name and something that directly
affects usability. +1 on fixing this. IMO, we don't
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 5:14 AM, Daniel Farina dan...@heroku.com wrote:
The first fact is that turning off hot standby will let the cluster
start up, but only after seeing a spate of messages like these (dozen
or dozens, not thousands):
2011-06-09 08:02:32 UTC LOG: restored log file
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 9:56 PM, Cédric Villemain
cedric.villemain.deb...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/6/12 Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com:
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 9:15 PM, Joshua D. Drake j...@commandprompt.com
wrote:
On 6/11/2011 1:23 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
There is a difference between a
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 6:26 PM, Florian Pflug f...@phlo.org wrote:
On Jun8, 2011, at 17:46 , Jeff Davis wrote:
It looks like the type input function may be a problem, because it
doesn't look like it knows what the collation is yet. In other words,
PG_GET_COLLATION() is zero for the type input
Hi Robert,
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 08:55:28PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 11:10 AM, Noah Misch n...@leadboat.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 10:22:59PM -0400, Noah Misch wrote:
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 01:56:22PM +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
On 12.03.2011
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 10:38 PM, Josh Kupershmidt schmi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
psql's auto-complete support for COMMENT ON was missing support for a
few object types:
1.) EXTENSION and PROCEDURAL LANGUAGE are now auto-complete candidates
for COMMENT ON [TAB]. Lists of extensions and
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 11:40 PM, Noah Misch n...@leadboat.com wrote:
We currently achieve that wait-free by first marking the page with the next
available xid and then reusing it when that mark (btpo.xact) predates the
oldest running xid (RecentXmin). (At the moment, I'm failing to work out
2011/6/9 Shigeru Hanada han...@metrosystems.co.jp:
Attached patch includes fixes for FOREIGN TABLE documents:
I committed the changes to ALTER FOREIGN TABLE, but I think the
changes to CREATE FOREIGN TABLE need more thought. The first of the
two hunks you've proposed to add doesn't seem
33 matches
Mail list logo
