I have added a modified version of this to the SGML documentation,
under data types.
---
bruce wrote:
> Here is an new XML section for our SGML documentation. It explains the
> various XML capabilities, if we support them,
David Fetter wrote:
> I think it's useful to mention what's arriving, what's being worked
> on, and what's not even being contemplated in the long term.
We don't even have a roadmap of any kind, so the last thing we can do is
put claims of that sort in the documentation.
> Similar troubles apply
bear some similarity to PL/Java and PL/J.
I think the big question is whether we are ever going to implement
these? I think we need to decide that before I mention them.
The SQL/Schemata thing is already in. I think we should at least
mention which features that we already have are from what
On Sat, Aug 26, 2006 at 08:38:43PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> David Fetter wrote:
> > We claim SQL standard compliance,
>
> No, we don't. And SQL conformance doesn't require you to implement
> all parts anyway.
Right. It'd be nice to be able to tell what level of conformance we
have to wh
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
David Fetter wrote:
We claim SQL standard compliance,
No, we don't. And SQL conformance doesn't require you to implement all
parts anyway.
so since those are part of
SQL:2003, we probably ought to mention them. SQL/PSM is a
programming language that lives inside
David Fetter wrote:
> The SQL/Schemata thing is already in. I think we should at least
> mention which features that we already have are from what part of the
> standard.
We do. Read the documentation.
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
---(en
David Fetter wrote:
> We claim SQL standard compliance,
No, we don't. And SQL conformance doesn't require you to implement all
parts anyway.
> so since those are part of
> SQL:2003, we probably ought to mention them. SQL/PSM is a
> programming language that lives inside the database, and DB2
David Fetter wrote:
> > > mention which features that we already have are from what part of
> > > the standard. As far as the rest of the standard goes, we might
> > > want to mention whether we've even considered any of each piece in
> > > the TODO list, and what sub-pieces, if any, are already
>
On Sat, Aug 26, 2006 at 01:16:06PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> David Fetter wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 26, 2006 at 12:48:32PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > David Fetter wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Aug 25, 2006 at 08:37:19PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > > > > > Speaking of other parts of the SQ
David Fetter wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 26, 2006 at 12:48:32PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > David Fetter wrote:
> > > On Fri, Aug 25, 2006 at 08:37:19PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > > > > Speaking of other parts of the SQL:2003 standard, how about one
> > > > > section each that mentions them?
On Sat, Aug 26, 2006 at 12:48:32PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> David Fetter wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 25, 2006 at 08:37:19PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > > Speaking of other parts of the SQL:2003 standard, how about one
> > > > section each that mentions them? There's
> > > >
> > > > Part 4:
Updated XML documentation based on feedback. Comments?
---
XML Document Support
XML (eXtensible Markup Language) support is not one capability, but a
variety of features supported by a database system.
David Fetter wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 25, 2006 at 08:37:19PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > David Fetter wrote:
> > > On Fri, Aug 25, 2006 at 07:46:57PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > > Here is an new XML section for our SGML documentation. It
> > > > explains the various XML capabilities, if we s
Nikolay Samokhvalov wrote:
> On 8/26/06, Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > Validation
> > > --
> > > /contrib/xml2 has a function called xml_valid() that can be used in
> > > a CHECK constraint to enforce that a field contains valid XML. It
> > > do
On Fri, Aug 25, 2006 at 08:37:19PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> David Fetter wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 25, 2006 at 07:46:57PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > Here is an new XML section for our SGML documentation. It
> > > explains the various XML capabilities, if we support them, and
> > > how to
On 8/26/06, Nikolay Samokhvalov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
If you decide to include the mentioning about contrib/xml2 to docs, I
would suggest the patch for this module. The patch renames that
function to xml_check() and adds xml_array() (issue from the current
TODO). Or it's too late for 8
On 8/26/06, Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Validation
> --
> /contrib/xml2 has a function called xml_valid() that can be used in
> a CHECK constraint to enforce that a field contains valid XML. It
> does not support validation against a specific XML sc
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> XML Document Support
>
> XML support is not one capability, but a variety of features
> supported by a database.
database system
> Storage
> ---
> PostgreSQL stores XML documents as ordinary text documents.
It is "possible" to do that, but this sou
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Here is an new XML section for our SGML documentation. It explains the
> various XML capabilities, if we support them, and how to use them.
>
> Comments?
>
+1. Users often ask this in the mailing lists. Where are you want to
put this? I'll suggest: FAQ. What do you all th
Euler Taveira de Oliveira wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > Here is an new XML section for our SGML documentation. It explains the
> > various XML capabilities, if we support them, and how to use them.
> >
> > Comments?
> >
> +1. Users often ask this in the mailing lists. Where are you want t
David Fetter wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 25, 2006 at 07:46:57PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Here is an new XML section for our SGML documentation. It explains
> > the various XML capabilities, if we support them, and how to use
> > them.
> >
> > Comments?
>
> This looks hauntingly similar to Peter
On Fri, Aug 25, 2006 at 07:46:57PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Here is an new XML section for our SGML documentation. It explains
> the various XML capabilities, if we support them, and how to use
> them.
>
> Comments?
This looks hauntingly similar to Peter's presentation at the
conference. :)
Here is an new XML section for our SGML documentation. It explains the
various XML capabilities, if we support them, and how to use them.
Comments?
---
XML Document Support
XML support is not one capab
23 matches
Mail list logo
