Stephen Frost wrote:
> I don't have time right at the moment (leaving shortly and will be gone
> all weekend) but what I would do is check the SQL standard, especially
> the information schema, for any requirement to track the grantor. Much
> of what I did was based on the standard so that may ha
* Alvaro Herrera ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I took a look, and concluded that the only bit of code that uses the
> grantor at all is pg_dumpall.
>
> Does this means we can remove it altogether? In back branches, we would
> take out the pg_dumpall code.
I don't have time right at the moment (le
Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> Why is it that we record grantor at all? One could argue that granting
> >> membership in a role is done on behalf of that role and there's no real
> >> need to remember exactly who did it.
>
> > I think you should ask Stephen Fro