Gregory Stark wrote:
"Tom Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
A seasoned developer might only need the file name to guess what kind of
file it is, but other people could probably use the help.
I think Peter's argument is that what kind of file it is really doesn't help a
regular user. Nonethele
"Tom Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> A seasoned developer might only need the file name to guess what kind of
> file it is, but other people could probably use the help.
I think Peter's argument is that what kind of file it is really doesn't help a
regular user. Nonetheless I agree strongly.
Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Just to get an opinion, which is better:
> could not open whatever file "%s": %m
> or just:
> could not open file "%s": %m
> It seems to me that by the time you get to a file error message of this
> level, the higher-level purpose of the file is pret
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Just to get an opinion, which is better:
could not open transaction log file "%s": %m
could not open control file "%s": %m
could not open data file "%s": %m
could not open temporary file "%s": %m
could not open whatever file "%s": %m
or just:
could not open file "%s": %
Just to get an opinion, which is better:
could not open transaction log file "%s": %m
could not open control file "%s": %m
could not open data file "%s": %m
could not open temporary file "%s": %m
could not open whatever file "%s": %m
or just:
could not open file "%s": %m
It seems to me that by
