On 24 November 2011 21:50, Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@commandprompt.com wrote:
Excerpts from Alvaro Herrera's message of vie nov 11 00:32:33 -0300 2011:
Excerpts from Thom Brown's message of jue nov 10 21:28:06 -0300 2011:
On 10 November 2011 23:56, Thom Brown t...@linux.com wrote:
The
On 25 November 2011 16:16, Dean Rasheed dean.a.rash...@gmail.com wrote:
On 24 November 2011 21:50, Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@commandprompt.com wrote:
Excerpts from Alvaro Herrera's message of vie nov 11 00:32:33 -0300 2011:
Excerpts from Thom Brown's message of jue nov 10 21:28:06 -0300 2011:
Excerpts from Dean Rasheed's message of vie nov 25 13:16:29 -0300 2011:
There is a similar problem with NOT VALID check constraints on
domains. These are still being dumped as part of the CREATE DOMAIN
statement, which is invalid syntax, so they need to be dumped
separately from the domain
Excerpts from Dean Rasheed's message of vie nov 25 13:45:34 -0300 2011:
Looking back at Thom's original example, it seems odd to allow this
syntax at all:
CREATE TABLE a (
num integer,
CONSTRAINT meow CHECK ((num 20)) NOT VALID
);
It's not documented, but is currently allowed.
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 4:28 PM, Alvaro Herrera
alvhe...@commandprompt.com wrote:
Excerpts from Dean Rasheed's message of vie nov 25 13:45:34 -0300 2011:
Looking back at Thom's original example, it seems odd to allow this
syntax at all:
CREATE TABLE a (
num integer,
CONSTRAINT meow
Excerpts from Alvaro Herrera's message of vie nov 11 00:32:33 -0300 2011:
Excerpts from Thom Brown's message of jue nov 10 21:28:06 -0300 2011:
On 10 November 2011 23:56, Thom Brown t...@linux.com wrote:
The dump correctly contains:
CREATE TABLE a (
num integer,
On 24 November 2011 21:50, Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@commandprompt.com wrote:
Excerpts from Alvaro Herrera's message of vie nov 11 00:32:33 -0300 2011:
Excerpts from Thom Brown's message of jue nov 10 21:28:06 -0300 2011:
On 10 November 2011 23:56, Thom Brown t...@linux.com wrote:
The
On 18 July 2011 02:46, Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@commandprompt.com wrote:
Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of dom jul 17 20:36:49 -0400 2011:
Does git allow for additional commit fields? That would allow for easy
tracking without much additional burden on committers.
I mean, there's git
On 10 November 2011 23:56, Thom Brown t...@linux.com wrote:
On 18 July 2011 02:46, Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@commandprompt.com wrote:
Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of dom jul 17 20:36:49 -0400 2011:
Does git allow for additional commit fields? That would allow for easy
tracking without
Excerpts from Thom Brown's message of jue nov 10 21:28:06 -0300 2011:
On 10 November 2011 23:56, Thom Brown t...@linux.com wrote:
The dump correctly contains:
CREATE TABLE a (
num integer,
CONSTRAINT meow CHECK ((num 20)) NOT VALID
);
Actually I mean incorrectly
On Jul 12, 2011, at 11:30 AM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
This all becomes much easier if we keep the ads out of the commit
messages, and stick to the technical side there. And find another
venue for the other credit.
I'm open to ideas.
I think the commit log isn't actually useful for the
On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 1:20 PM, Jim Nasby j...@nasby.net wrote:
On Jul 12, 2011, at 11:30 AM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
This all becomes much easier if we keep the ads out of the commit
messages, and stick to the technical side there. And find another
venue for the other credit.
I'm open to
On 07/17/2011 08:36 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
We do need a way to track this information.
+1 on everything Josh said.
Does git allow for additional commit fields? That would allow for easy tracking
without much additional burden on committers.
I mean, there's git notes, but that's not
On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 8:44 PM, Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net wrote:
My understanding of git notes is that they can be added after a commit
without changing the commit - indeed that's apparently a large part of their
raison d'être:
A typical use of notes is to supplement a commit
Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of dom jul 17 20:36:49 -0400 2011:
Does git allow for additional commit fields? That would allow for easy
tracking without much additional burden on committers.
I mean, there's git notes, but that's not exactly what we're looking
for here, and I don't
On Jul 11, 2011, at 8:34 PM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
Can we add text if the employer is _not_ the feature sponsor?
I don't see that as much better. Commit messages should not be ads, IMHO.
There are plenty of ways to give credit without polluting the commit log with
it.
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 02:34, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
Simon Riggs wrote:
On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 7:51 PM, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
On tor, 2011-06-30 at 15:09 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Robert Hass (whose name I misspelled in the commit message above) just
Excerpts from Magnus Hagander's message of mar jul 12 09:34:56 -0400 2011:
Agreed. On one level I like the sponsor message, but on the other
having Sponsored by RedHat on every Tom Lane item will get tiring.
;-)
Can we add text if the employer is _not_ the feature sponsor?
That
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Excerpts from Magnus Hagander's message of mar jul 12 09:34:56 -0400 2011:
Agreed. ??On one level I like the sponsor message, but on the other
having Sponsored by RedHat on every Tom Lane item will get tiring.
;-)
Can we add text if the employer is _not_ the
On 07/12/2011 06:54 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Excerpts from Magnus Hagander's message of mar jul 12 09:34:56 -0400 2011:
Agreed. On one level I like the sponsor message, but on the other
having Sponsored by RedHat on every Tom Lane item will get tiring.
;-)
Create a macro ;)
Can we add
Simon Riggs wrote:
On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 7:51 PM, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
On tor, 2011-06-30 at 15:09 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Robert Hass (whose name I misspelled in the commit message above) just
mentioned to me (in an answer to my apologizing about it) that he
On tor, 2011-06-30 at 15:09 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Robert Hass (whose name I misspelled in the commit message above) just
mentioned to me (in an answer to my apologizing about it) that he
didn't think that mentioning sponsors for patch development was a good
idea.
I don't think we
On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 20:51, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
On tor, 2011-06-30 at 15:09 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Robert Hass (whose name I misspelled in the commit message above) just
mentioned to me (in an answer to my apologizing about it) that he
didn't think that mentioning
On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 7:51 PM, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
On tor, 2011-06-30 at 15:09 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Robert Hass (whose name I misspelled in the commit message above) just
mentioned to me (in an answer to my apologizing about it) that he
didn't think that mentioning
Excerpts from Alvaro Herrera's message of jue jun 30 11:58:09 -0400 2011:
Enable CHECK constraints to be declared NOT VALID
[...]
This patch was sponsored by Enova Financial.
Robert Hass (whose name I misspelled in the commit message above) just
mentioned to me (in an answer to my
On Jun 30, 2011, at 12:09 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Robert Hass (whose name I misspelled in the commit message above) just
mentioned to me (in an answer to my apologizing about it) that he didn't
think that mentioning sponsors for patch development was a good idea.
I don't think we have a
On Thu, 2011-06-30 at 15:09 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
snip
I don't think we have a policy for this, but I have done it for some
time now and nobody has complained, so I sort of assumed it was okay.
Besides, some of the people pouring the money in does care about it;
moreover, it provides
27 matches
Mail list logo
