On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 11:43 PM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
Thom Brown wrote:
On 7 March 2011 22:31, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 6:16 AM, Thom Brown t...@linux.com wrote:
On 7 March 2011 15:27, Thom Brown t...@linux.com wrote:
I've attached a
Thom Brown wrote:
On 7 March 2011 22:31, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 6:16 AM, Thom Brown t...@linux.com wrote:
On 7 March 2011 15:27, Thom Brown t...@linux.com wrote:
I've attached a small patch with a bit of clarification and a typo fix
in the
On 8 March 2011 01:08, David Fetter da...@fetter.org wrote:
On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 02:31:18PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 2:07 PM, David Fetter da...@fetter.org wrote:
Re: docs, I'd actually like to see that list gone, as the separation
of docs from code is one that's
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 6:16 AM, Thom Brown t...@linux.com wrote:
On 7 March 2011 15:27, Thom Brown t...@linux.com wrote:
I've attached a small patch with a bit of clarification and a typo fix
in the synchronous_standby_names parameter info.
Okay, I've noticed that the main documentation also
On 7 March 2011 22:31, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 6:16 AM, Thom Brown t...@linux.com wrote:
On 7 March 2011 15:27, Thom Brown t...@linux.com wrote:
I've attached a small patch with a bit of clarification and a typo fix
in the synchronous_standby_names
On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 10:53:17PM +0530, Thom Brown wrote:
On 7 March 2011 22:31, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 6:16 AM, Thom Brown t...@linux.com wrote:
On 7 March 2011 15:27, Thom Brown t...@linux.com wrote:
I've attached a small patch with a bit of
On 7 March 2011 23:21, David Fetter da...@fetter.org wrote:
On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 10:53:17PM +0530, Thom Brown wrote:
On 7 March 2011 22:31, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 6:16 AM, Thom Brown t...@linux.com wrote:
On 7 March 2011 15:27, Thom Brown
On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 11:34:48PM +0530, Thom Brown wrote:
On 7 March 2011 23:21, David Fetter da...@fetter.org wrote:
On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 10:53:17PM +0530, Thom Brown wrote:
On 7 March 2011 22:31, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 6:16 AM, Thom Brown
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 1:04 PM, Thom Brown t...@linux.com wrote:
On 7 March 2011 23:21, David Fetter da...@fetter.org wrote:
On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 10:53:17PM +0530, Thom Brown wrote:
On 7 March 2011 22:31, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 6:16 AM, Thom Brown
Thom Brown t...@linux.com writes:
On 7 March 2011 23:21, David Fetter da...@fetter.org wrote:
As I'm putting together the patches section for the PostgreSQL Weekly
News, it helps me *enormously* to have only one list I need to check,
so at least for me, it's an enormous help to have all
Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of lun mar 07 15:16:31 -0300 2011:
If we do that then it becomes worth wondering what the -docs list is for
at all. Maybe we *should* get rid of it; I dunno. I see your point
about how the factual issues involved in a docs change ought to be
vetted on
On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 03:45:17PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of lun mar 07 15:16:31 -0300 2011:
If we do that then it becomes worth wondering what the -docs list is for
at all. Maybe we *should* get rid of it; I dunno. I see your point
about how the
On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 01:01:05PM -0600, Ross J. Reedstrom wrote:
On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 03:45:17PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of lun mar 07 15:16:31 -0300
2011:
If we do that then it becomes worth wondering what the -docs
list is for at all.
On 3/7/11 11:07 AM, David Fetter wrote:
Re: docs, I'd actually like to see that list gone, as the separation
of docs from code is one that's actively unhelpful. We don't have a
separate docs team, and we rightly put the responsibility of
documenting changes on the person or people patching
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 2:07 PM, David Fetter da...@fetter.org wrote:
Re: docs, I'd actually like to see that list gone, as the separation
of docs from code is one that's actively unhelpful. We don't have a
separate docs team, and we rightly put the responsibility of
documenting changes on the
On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 02:31:18PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 2:07 PM, David Fetter da...@fetter.org wrote:
Re: docs, I'd actually like to see that list gone, as the separation
of docs from code is one that's actively unhelpful. We don't have a
separate docs team, and
16 matches
Mail list logo
