On Sunday, September 09, 2012 08:40:38 PM Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund writes:
> > On Tuesday, September 04, 2012 09:33:54 PM Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> >> * There are way too many #ifdef VERBOSE_DEBUG stuff for my taste. It
> >> might look better if you had macros such as elog_debug() that are
>
Andres Freund writes:
> On Tuesday, September 04, 2012 09:33:54 PM Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> * There are way too many #ifdef VERBOSE_DEBUG stuff for my taste. It
>> might look better if you had macros such as elog_debug() that are defined
>> to empty if VERBOSE_DEBUG is not defined. (The problem
Hi Alvaro, hi all,
On Tuesday, September 04, 2012 09:33:54 PM Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Excerpts from Andres Freund's message of jue jul 19 06:29:03 -0400 2012:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Attached is v2 of the patch.
>
> Hello,
>
> I gave this code a quick read some days ago. Here's the stuff I would
> cha
Excerpts from Andres Freund's message of jue jul 19 06:29:03 -0400 2012:
> Hi,
>
> Attached is v2 of the patch.
Hello,
I gave this code a quick read some days ago. Here's the stuff I would
change:
* There are way too many #ifdef VERBOSE_DEBUG stuff for my taste. It
might look better if you ha
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 1:03 PM, Satoshi Nagayasu wrote:
>> The stringinfo thing has long been an annoyance to me. libpq has
>> PQExpBuffer which is the exact same thing. I don't like that we have
>> two implementations of that in two different code bases, and you have
>> to remember to spell it
2012/07/24 1:15, Robert Haas wrote:
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 12:13 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
Could that be fixed by moving the debugging routines into a separate
set of files, instead of having them lumped in with the code that
applies those xlog records?
Its a major effort. Those function use e
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 12:13 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
>> Could that be fixed by moving the debugging routines into a separate
>> set of files, instead of having them lumped in with the code that
>> applies those xlog records?
> Its a major effort. Those function use elog(), stringinfo and lots of
On Monday, July 23, 2012 05:11:20 PM Robert Haas wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Andres Freund
wrote:
> > On Monday, July 23, 2012 04:17:39 PM Robert Haas wrote:
> >> On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 3:19 AM, Andres Freund
> >
> > wrote:
> >> > On Thursday, July 19, 2012 07:18:08 PM Satoshi N
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
> On Monday, July 23, 2012 04:17:39 PM Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 3:19 AM, Andres Freund
> wrote:
>> > On Thursday, July 19, 2012 07:18:08 PM Satoshi Nagayasu wrote:
>> >> I agree with that we need more sophisticated way to
On Monday, July 23, 2012 04:17:39 PM Robert Haas wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 3:19 AM, Andres Freund
wrote:
> > On Thursday, July 19, 2012 07:18:08 PM Satoshi Nagayasu wrote:
> >> I agree with that we need more sophisticated way to share the code
> >> between the backend and several utilities
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 3:19 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
> On Thursday, July 19, 2012 07:18:08 PM Satoshi Nagayasu wrote:
>> I agree with that we need more sophisticated way to share the code
>> between the backend and several utilities (including xlogdump),
>> but AFAIK, a contrib module must allow
Hi,
On Thursday, July 19, 2012 07:18:08 PM Satoshi Nagayasu wrote:
> I agree with that we need more sophisticated way to share the code
> between the backend and several utilities (including xlogdump),
> but AFAIK, a contrib module must allow to be built *without* the core
> source tree.
I don't t
2012/07/19 19:29, Andres Freund wrote:
Hi,
Attached is v2 of the patch.
Changes are:
* more comments
* significantly cleaned/simpliefied coded
* crc validation
* addition of XLogReaderReadOne
Definitely needed are:
* better validation of records
* customizable error handling
The first is just
13 matches
Mail list logo