On Sun, 2006-07-16 at 01:04 +0300, Hannu Krosing wrote:
> Ühel kenal päeval, R, 2006-07-14 kell 17:39, kirjutas Simon Riggs:
> > On Fri, 2006-07-14 at 12:09 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > > "Florian G. Pflug" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > > I've now thought about how to fix that without doing that
Ühel kenal päeval, L, 2006-07-15 kell 22:24, kirjutas Tom Lane:
> Hannu Krosing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > And by any chance, do you plan to backport the standby WAL playback mode
> > patches to 8.0 and 8.1 series ?
>
> That's not happening ... we do not put new features in stable branches.
Hannu Krosing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> And by any chance, do you plan to backport the standby WAL playback mode
> patches to 8.0 and 8.1 series ?
That's not happening ... we do not put new features in stable branches.
regards, tom lane
---(end
Ühel kenal päeval, R, 2006-07-14 kell 17:39, kirjutas Simon Riggs:
> On Fri, 2006-07-14 at 12:09 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > "Florian G. Pflug" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > I've now thought about how to fix that without doing that rather crude
> > > rsync-pg_xlog-hack.
> > > I've read through
Simon Riggs wrote:
On Fri, 2006-07-14 at 12:09 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
"Florian G. Pflug" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I've now thought about how to fix that without doing that rather crude
rsync-pg_xlog-hack.
I've read through the code, and learned that wal-segments are expected to have
a spec
On Fri, 2006-07-14 at 12:09 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Florian G. Pflug" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I've now thought about how to fix that without doing that rather crude
> > rsync-pg_xlog-hack.
> > I've read through the code, and learned that wal-segments are expected to
> > have a specific
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Florian G. Pflug
> Sent: 14 July 2006 16:37
> To: Postgresql-General
> Cc: A.M.
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Forcing wal rotation
>
> > How about an SQL-level fu
"Florian G. Pflug" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've now thought about how to fix that without doing that rather crude
> rsync-pg_xlog-hack.
> I've read through the code, and learned that wal-segments are expected to
> have a specific size -
> thus rotating them "early" is not that easy.
Simon
Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 05:36:58PM +0200, Florian G. Pflug wrote:
That was the idea - providing pg_rotate_wal(), which would guarantee that
the wal is rotatted at least once if called. Thinking further about this,
for a first prove of concept, I'd be enough to write
On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 05:36:58PM +0200, Florian G. Pflug wrote:
> That was the idea - providing pg_rotate_wal(), which would guarantee that
> the wal is rotatted at least once if called. Thinking further about this,
> for a first prove of concept, I'd be enough to write a C function
> pg_current_
A.M. wrote:
On Fri, July 14, 2006 11:20 am, Florian G. Pflug wrote:
Hi
For my warm-standby-cluster I'm now saving the currently used wal using
rsync, to avoid loosing data from a few hours (or days) ago, when there is
little traffic, and thus the wal isn't rotated. For online backups, the
prob
11 matches
Mail list logo
