-Original Message-
From: Andrew Dunstan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 05 November 2003 00:53
To: PostgreSQL-development
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Open Sourcing pgManage
Andreas Pflug wrote:
pgAdmin is designed for a good interactive experience, which isn't
achievable
Dave Page wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Dunstan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Don't get me wrong - pgadmin is cool - I especially recommend
it to my Windows oriented clients and colleagues who hate
using command lines.
Why not your Linux or FreeBSD oriented
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Dunstan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 05 November 2003 12:48
To: PostgreSQL-development
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Open Sourcing pgManage
especially != only
Very true :-)
BTW, pgadmin could improve its Linux coverage somewhat
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Greg Stark) writes:
Andrew Dunstan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think there is room for lots of GUIs, though, and having a Java
admin GUI would be cool too, as would having a servlet/JSP based
admin client deployable as a web archive.
If someone's looking for an
Christopher Browne [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Was that a 'native' part of SHELF? Or more related to their TM1
product?
The full source was included in SHELF (if that was the source release I'm
thinking of.) I think it was called axdata.
FYI, while Applix and VistaSource have orphaned it,
Joshua D. Drake writes:
I thought that we might donate it to the project as a whole. What are
people's thoughts on
this?
I think the decision has been made that no new client applications will be
included with PostgreSQL. We will provide a server and let a happy bunch
of client
Hello,
If that is the case that is fine. I just wanted to throw it out there
but doesn't that mean that
psql would be separate as well?
J
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Joshua D. Drake writes:
I thought that we might donate it to the project as a whole. What are
people's thoughts on
this?
On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 14:14, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
Hello,
As Command Prompt is about to release it's Replication product we are
open sourcing our
pgManage. pgManage is similar to pgAdmin but as it is java based it is
truly cross platform
and should easily support most if not all of
On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
Hello,
If that is the case that is fine. I just wanted to throw it out there
but doesn't that mean that
psql would be separate as well?
no new client applications
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 9:
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
Hello,
If that is the case that is fine. I just wanted to throw it out there
but doesn't that mean that
psql would be separate as well?
no new client applications
BTW, Joshua, thanks for releasing this - all my
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Joshua D. Drake writes:
I thought that we might donate it to the project as a whole. What are
people's thoughts on
this?
I think the decision has been made that no new client applications will be
included with PostgreSQL.
Donation doesn't equal
On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
Hello,
If that is the case that is fine. I just wanted to throw it out there
but doesn't that mean that
psql would be separate as well?
no new client applications
Joshua,
I'd love to see it donated to the community as well!
Dave
On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 16:01, Tom Lane wrote:
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Joshua D. Drake writes:
I thought that we might donate it to the project as a whole. What are
people's thoughts on
this?
I think
If it doesn't do jsp now, it would be a good starting point for a web
version, as java lends it self well to multiple views.
Dave
On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 15:59, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Joshua D. Drake
D'oh, just clued into the 'java' aspect ... Joshua, will this run as a
JSP, remotely, through Jakarta-Tomcat? One of the limitations of pgAdmin,
as far as I'm concerned, is the fact that you can run it remotely ... if
you could run pgManage under something like Jakarta-Tomcat as a JSP, that
Josh,
Yes it has a Java requirement but hey that is a lot easier than a
GTK requirement to fullfill.
My thought is that it could be included as pgAccess used to be.
As we discussed, PostgreSQL is blessed with three ... now 4 ... good GUI
interfaces. We don't have the justification
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
JSP, remotely, through Jakarta-Tomcat? One of the limitations of pgAdmin,
as far as I'm concerned, is the fact that you can run it remotely ... if
you could run pgManage under something like Jakarta-Tomcat as a JSP, that
would be *really* cool ...
D'oh, just clued into
Andreas Pflug wrote:
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
JSP, remotely, through Jakarta-Tomcat? One of the limitations of
pgAdmin,
as far as I'm concerned, is the fact that you can run it remotely ... if
you could run pgManage under something like Jakarta-Tomcat as a JSP,
that
would be *really* cool
Andrew Dunstan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think there is room for lots of GUIs, though, and having a Java admin GUI
would be cool too, as would having a servlet/JSP based admin client deployable
as a web archive.
If someone's looking for an interesting GUI project, Applix had a database
D'oh, just clued into the 'java' aspect ... Joshua, will this run as a
JSP, remotely, through Jakarta-Tomcat? One of the limitations of pgAdmin,
as far as I'm concerned, is the fact that you can run it remotely
Then use phpPgAdmin...
Chris
---(end of
20 matches
Mail list logo
