2010/3/11 KaiGai Kohei kai...@ak.jp.nec.com:
(2010/03/11 23:55), Robert Haas wrote:
2010/3/10 KaiGai Koheikai...@ak.jp.nec.com:
Indeed, it is useful to allow renaming attribute of composite types.
However, it is also useless to allow to rename attribute of sequences,
but harmless, like
2010/3/10 KaiGai Kohei kai...@ak.jp.nec.com:
Indeed, it is useful to allow renaming attribute of composite types.
However, it is also useless to allow to rename attribute of sequences,
but harmless, like renames on indexes. It seems to me it is fair enough
to allow renaming attributes of
(2010/03/11 23:55), Robert Haas wrote:
2010/3/10 KaiGai Koheikai...@ak.jp.nec.com:
Indeed, it is useful to allow renaming attribute of composite types.
However, it is also useless to allow to rename attribute of sequences,
but harmless, like renames on indexes. It seems to me it is fair
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 7:16 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/3/3 KaiGai Kohei kai...@ak.jp.nec.com:
(2010/03/03 22:42), Robert Haas wrote:
2010/3/3 KaiGai Koheikai...@ak.jp.nec.com:
(2010/03/03 14:26), Robert Haas wrote:
2010/3/2 KaiGai Koheikai...@ak.jp.nec.com:
Is it an
(2010/03/11 0:54), Robert Haas wrote:
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 7:16 PM, Robert Haasrobertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/3/3 KaiGai Koheikai...@ak.jp.nec.com:
(2010/03/03 22:42), Robert Haas wrote:
2010/3/3 KaiGai Koheikai...@ak.jp.nec.com:
(2010/03/03 14:26), Robert Haas wrote:
2010/3/2 KaiGai
Hi,
KaiGai Kohei írta:
(2010/03/03 14:26), Robert Haas wrote:
2010/3/2 KaiGai Koheikai...@ak.jp.nec.com:
Is it an expected behavior?
postgres= CREATE SEQUENCE s;
CREATE SEQUENCE
postgres= ALTER TABLE s RENAME sequence_name TO abcd;
ALTER TABLE
postgres= CREATE
2010/3/3 KaiGai Kohei kai...@ak.jp.nec.com:
(2010/03/03 14:26), Robert Haas wrote:
2010/3/2 KaiGai Koheikai...@ak.jp.nec.com:
Is it an expected behavior?
postgres= CREATE SEQUENCE s;
CREATE SEQUENCE
postgres= ALTER TABLE s RENAME sequence_name TO abcd;
ALTER TABLE
postgres=
(2010/03/03 22:42), Robert Haas wrote:
2010/3/3 KaiGai Koheikai...@ak.jp.nec.com:
(2010/03/03 14:26), Robert Haas wrote:
2010/3/2 KaiGai Koheikai...@ak.jp.nec.com:
Is it an expected behavior?
postgres=CREATE SEQUENCE s;
CREATE SEQUENCE
postgres=ALTER TABLE s RENAME
2010/3/3 KaiGai Kohei kai...@ak.jp.nec.com:
(2010/03/03 22:42), Robert Haas wrote:
2010/3/3 KaiGai Koheikai...@ak.jp.nec.com:
(2010/03/03 14:26), Robert Haas wrote:
2010/3/2 KaiGai Koheikai...@ak.jp.nec.com:
Is it an expected behavior?
postgres= CREATE SEQUENCE s;
CREATE SEQUENCE
KaiGai Kohei kai...@ak.jp.nec.com writes:
Is it an expected behavior?
There's no particular reason to forbid it, is there?
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
(2010/03/03 11:22), Tom Lane wrote:
KaiGai Koheikai...@ak.jp.nec.com writes:
Is it an expected behavior?
There's no particular reason to forbid it, is there?
Perhaps, it is harmless.
It just seemed to me the renameatt() was not implemented correctly
according to the documentation.
--
2010/3/2 KaiGai Kohei kai...@ak.jp.nec.com:
Is it an expected behavior?
postgres= CREATE SEQUENCE s;
CREATE SEQUENCE
postgres= ALTER TABLE s RENAME sequence_name TO abcd;
ALTER TABLE
postgres= CREATE TABLE t (a int primary key, b text);
NOTICE: CREATE TABLE / PRIMARY KEY will
(2010/03/03 14:26), Robert Haas wrote:
2010/3/2 KaiGai Koheikai...@ak.jp.nec.com:
Is it an expected behavior?
postgres= CREATE SEQUENCE s;
CREATE SEQUENCE
postgres= ALTER TABLE s RENAME sequence_name TO abcd;
ALTER TABLE
postgres= CREATE TABLE t (a int primary key, b text);
13 matches
Mail list logo
