Clarification, this is the email used to make the patch that was
backpatched.
---
Albe Laurenz wrote:
I have tried --with-thread-safety and configure fails on ldap check
because for some reason CTHREAD_FLAGS (-Kpthread
If libldap_r.so does require the same libs, please add
$EXTRA_LDAP_LIBS
to the 'LDAP_LIBS_FE=-lldap_r' line as well.
Actually, I did that in the patch-as-committed. It seems to me that
it's probably harmless even if not needed.
I have tried --with-thread-safety and configure fails on ldap
Hi Albe,
On Mon, 18 Dec 2006, Albe Laurenz wrote:
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 09:31:35 +0100
From: Albe Laurenz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ohp@pyrenet.fr, Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: pgsql-hackers list pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: RE: [HACKERS] unixware and --with-ldap
If libldap_r.so
I have tried --with-thread-safety and configure fails on ldap check
because for some reason CTHREAD_FLAGS (-Kpthread for UW) is missing
on compile command, although present before that. I can't find why
You mean PTHREAD_FLAGS, right?
Nope,I mean PTHREAD_CFLAGS witch is defined in
On Fri, 15 Dec 2006, Tom Lane wrote:
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 10:20:44 -0500
From: Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Albe Laurenz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: ohp@pyrenet.fr, pgsql-hackers list pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] unixware and --with-ldap
Albe Laurenz [EMAIL PROTECTED
Here's the diff for configure.in that works for me.
I have a concern about this patch:
if test $enable_thread_safety = yes; then
# on some platforms ldap_r fails to link without PTHREAD_LIBS
AC_CHECK_LIB(ldap_r, ldap_simple_bind, [],
Hi Albe,
Thanks for your remarks
On Fri, 15 Dec 2006, Albe Laurenz wrote:
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 09:54:13 +0100
From: Albe Laurenz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ohp@pyrenet.fr, Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: pgsql-hackers list pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: RE: [HACKERS] unixware
Olivier PRENANT wrote:
You left out the case where --enable_thread_safety is specified.
In that case, the frontend has to be linked with libldap_r.so
instead of libldap.so.
Yes, this was on purpose, my goal is to try to make a second
patch when...
Does libldap_r.so _not_ require any
On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 01:06:08PM +0100, Albe Laurenz wrote:
I guess that adding $EXTRA_LDAP_LIBS to -lldap_r will be enough,
judging from the evidence on Linux.
Linux doesn't need the extra libraries, it's linked properly.
Additionally, on Linux there is no difference between ldap and
Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
I guess that adding $EXTRA_LDAP_LIBS to -lldap_r will be enough,
judging from the evidence on Linux.
Linux doesn't need the extra libraries, it's linked properly.
Yes - what I mean is, libldap_r.so references only
NEEDED libsasl.so.7
NEEDED
Albe Laurenz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You left out the case where --enable_thread_safety is specified.
...
If libldap_r.so does require the same libs, please add $EXTRA_LDAP_LIBS
to the 'LDAP_LIBS_FE=-lldap_r' line as well.
Actually, I did that in the patch-as-committed. It seems to me that
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Andrew Dunstan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: ohp@pyrenet.fr, pgsql-hackers list pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] unixware and --with-ldap
Andrew Dunstan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The right way to do this I think is to put an entry adjusting LIBS in
src
ohp@pyrenet.fr writes:
Here's the diff for configure.in that works for me.
Applied, thanks.
regards, tom lane
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
On Tue, 12 Dec 2006, Albe Laurenz wrote:
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 16:42:50 +0100
From: Albe Laurenz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ohp@pyrenet.fr, pgsql-hackers list pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [HACKERS] unixware and --with-ldap
Olivier PRENANT wrote:
When I
]
To: Albe Laurenz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: ohp@pyrenet.fr, pgsql-hackers list pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] unixware and --with-ldap
Albe Laurenz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Shouldn't that be
AC_CHECK_LIB(ldap_r, ldap_simple_bind, [],
[AC_MSG_ERROR([library
ohp@pyrenet.fr writes:
I was in the process of testing this. But I believe tweaking with
configure.in will not help me as I have no way to regenerate configure...
Install autoconf; it's no big deal.
regards, tom lane
---(end of
Olivier PRENANT wrote:
When I swithed to the newest version og pgbuildfarm, I noticed that
--with-ldap (now by defaut) didn't work on UnixWare.
This is because, on Unixware, ldap needs lber and resolv.
Or was libldap not linked against liblber and libresolv?
Dunno!
Did'nt do it myself,
@pyrenet.fr, pgsql-hackers list pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] unixware and --with-ldap
Andrew Dunstan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The right way to do this I think is to put an entry adjusting LIBS in
src/makefiles/Makefile.unixware, but first it looks like we need
Olivier PRENANT wrote:
When I swithed to the newest version og pgbuildfarm, I noticed that
--with-ldap (now by defaut) didn't work on UnixWare.
This is because, on Unixware, ldap needs lber and resolv.
Is libldap a static library on that system?
Or do shared libraries on Unixware
Albe Laurenz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Shouldn't that be
AC_CHECK_LIB(ldap_r, ldap_simple_bind, [],
[AC_MSG_ERROR([library 'ldap_r' is required for
LDAP])],
[$PTHREAD_LIBS $EXTRA_LDAP_LIBS])
Ooops, of course. Like I said, untested ;-)
On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 04:42:50PM +0100, Albe Laurenz wrote:
Or do shared libraries on Unixware generally 'not remember'
the libraries they were linked against (this would be strange).
It could be that whoever compiled libldap there did not include the
dependancies at link time. It is legal to
ohp@pyrenet.fr wrote:
Hi all,
When I swithed to the newest version og pgbuildfarm, I noticed that
--with-ldap (now by defaut) didn't work on UnixWare.
This is because, on Unixware, ldap needs lber and resolv.
Not being a configure guru, I made the change bellow locally and that
works for me.
@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] unixware and --with-ldap
ohp@pyrenet.fr wrote:
Hi all,
When I swithed to the newest version og pgbuildfarm, I noticed that
--with-ldap (now by defaut) didn't work on UnixWare.
This is because, on Unixware, ldap needs lber and resolv.
Not being
Andrew Dunstan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The right way to do this I think is to put an entry adjusting LIBS in
src/makefiles/Makefile.unixware, but first it looks like we need to
propagate the with-ldap switch into src/Makefile.global
The Makefile is far too late --- this has to be adjusted
24 matches
Mail list logo
