> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert Treat
> Sent: 23 August 2006 04:16
> To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> Cc: Peter Eisentraut; Tom Lane
> Subject: Re: pgsql-patches reply-to (was Re: [HACKERS]
> [
On Aug 23, 2006, at 12:15 , Robert Treat wrote:
On Thursday 17 August 2006 11:55, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Yeah, that experiment hasn't seemed to work all that well for me
either. Do you have another idea to try, or do you just want to
revert to the old way?
Since almost the
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Robert Treat wrote:
>> ... some other tricks people have to make emails more manageable (anyone
>> combine all pg mail to one folder?)
> Yes, all mine are in one folder, and I use elm ME. It is faster than a
> GUI email client.
All my PG list mail go
On Thursday 17 August 2006 11:55, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Yeah, that experiment hasn't seemed to work all that well for me
> > either. Do you have another idea to try, or do you just want to
> > revert to the old way?
>
> Since almost the first day I hacked on PostgreSQL I ha
On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 09:20:43AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Ever since pgsql-patches replies started going to -hackers, threading
> > doesn't work anymore, so I for one can't tell what this refers to at
> > all.
>
> Yeah, that experiment hasn't se
Tom Lane wrote:
> Yeah, that experiment hasn't seemed to work all that well for me
> either. Do you have another idea to try, or do you just want to
> revert to the old way?
Since almost the first day I hacked on PostgreSQL I have been filtering
both lists into the same folder, so they pretty mu
