Re: [JDBC] Does PG's JDBC support prepared statements at all?

2001-10-22 Thread Dave Cramer
Remove the single quotes from '?' there is no need for them. Dave -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Dr. Evil Sent: October 20, 2001 7:14 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [JDBC] Does PG's JDBC support prepared statements at all? There

Re: [JDBC] Does PG's JDBC support prepared statements at all?

2001-10-22 Thread Rene Pijlman
On Sun, 21 Oct 2001 11:37:29 +0900, you wrote: So I guess what is happening is that the preparedstatement parser ignores quoted question marks I hope not. I hope it sets the field to a literal '?' :-) Regards, René Pijlman [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---(end of

Re: [JDBC] PreparedStatement parameters question

2001-10-22 Thread Rene Pijlman
On 20 Oct 2001 22:34:05 -, you wrote: PreparedStatement st = db.prepareStatement(UPDATE foo SET ? = '?' + WHERE number = ?); Whenever I use this I get a Parameter index out of range error. I am assuming that what this means is that I can't use a ? as a column name, but it

Re: [JDBC] Does PG's JDBC support prepared statements at all?

2001-10-22 Thread Rene Pijlman
On 20 Oct 2001 23:14:22 -, you wrote: There is a bunch of documentation for prepared statements in PG's JDBC, it seems that the only thing prepared statements do is throw exceptions. I suggest you read some basic JDBC documentation. This is really not PostgreSQL specific. Checkout

OT Re: [JDBC] Ant installation (and other) issues!

2001-10-22 Thread Ned Wolpert
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 21-Oct-2001 Peter Eisentraut wrote: Per-Olof Norén writes: The Ant build system is making its way to be a de facto standard for building java applications as it is built for the purpose. Make as been the standard for building any

Re: [JDBC] Ant installation (and other) issues!

2001-10-22 Thread Barry Lind
Per-Olof Norén wrote: Hi all, I have been listening to the discussions about Ant and the build system. I think that the discussion is missing a point, which I will try to make here :-) 1. Standard The Ant build system is making its way to be a de facto standard for

Re: [JDBC] Ant installation (and other) issues!

2001-10-22 Thread Gunnar Rønning
* Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | | Per-Olof Norén writes: | | The Ant build system is making its way to be a de facto standard for building |java applications as | it is built for the purpose. | | Make as been the standard for building any application for about 30 years. |

Re: [JDBC] Ant installation (and other) issues!

2001-10-22 Thread Marko Kreen
On Sat, Oct 20, 2001 at 03:54:12PM +0200, Per-Olof Norén wrote: Hi all, I have been listening to the discussions about Ant and the build system. I think that the discussion is missing a point, which I will try to make here :-) [ points for using Ant ] I would describe current JDBC build

Re: [JDBC] FW: Re: [PATCHES] Ant configuration

2001-10-22 Thread Barry Lind
If we can include the ANT libraries in our CVS then my objection to ANT (requiring users to trackdown and download ANT) goes away, and I would then suggest we continue to use ANT for the other reasons you mention. Does anyone know if we could include ANT into our CVS and redistribute it in

Re: [JDBC] Ant installation (and other) issues!

2001-10-22 Thread Tom Lane
Gunnar =?iso-8859-1?q?R=F8nning?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: But anyway this off topic, what need to have is a build process that works nicely and I think including the ant binaries(around 500k) would be the best solution here. 500k of binaries? You just lost the argument. That's not an

[JDBC] JDBC build - take 2

2001-10-22 Thread Marko Kreen
Here is updated patch: * fixed couple of typos. * installdirs and uninstall targets * converted contrib/retep to make too, now no parts of PostgreSQL source _require_ Ant. * made the JUnit tests work too -- marko Index: configure.in

Re: [JDBC] Ant installation (and other) issues!

2001-10-22 Thread Ned Wolpert
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 22-Oct-2001 Bruce Momjian wrote: A more important point is that we are not a java-only codebase. If we were, I could see a stronger argument for Ant. As it is now, we have to weigh using a Java-standard Ant vs. a PostgreSQL/C-standard

Re: [JDBC] Does PG's JDBC support prepared statements at all?

2001-10-22 Thread Thomas O'Dowd
On Sun, Oct 21, 2001 at 02:06:21PM +0200, Rene Pijlman wrote: On Sun, 21 Oct 2001 11:37:29 +0900, you wrote: So I guess what is happening is that the preparedstatement parser ignores quoted question marks I hope not. I hope it sets the field to a literal '?' :-) I meant ignores them in

Re: [JDBC] Whatever ... JDBC build patch

2001-10-22 Thread Marko Kreen
On Sat, Oct 20, 2001 at 04:15:56AM +0200, Gunnar Rønning wrote: * Marko Kreen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | | * driver type is researched in configure, which is the | right place for it. How do distributors that need to build all driver types proceed ? Compile for each platform in

Re: [JDBC] [PATCHES] Ant configuration

2001-10-22 Thread Ned Wolpert
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 20-Oct-2001 Gunnar Rønning wrote: | * Ant doesn't provide an exit status; you have to watch the build to see | if it works. This is unacceptable. Hmm. Anybody with a solution here ? Actuall, it does. Example: [wolpert@wolpert configTest]$

Re: [JDBC] Ant installation (and other) issues!

2001-10-22 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Per-Olof Norén writes: The Ant build system is making its way to be a de facto standard for building java applications as it is built for the purpose. Make as been the standard for building any application for about 30 years. GNU-style configure has been the standard for configuration

Re: [JDBC] Whatever ... JDBC build patch

2001-10-22 Thread Ned Wolpert
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 20-Oct-2001 Peter Eisentraut wrote: How do distributors that need to build all driver types proceed ? I haven't seen one yet, but theoretically they should configure several different build trees from one source tree. Of course, this

Re: [JDBC] Ant installation (and other) issues!

2001-10-22 Thread Gunnar Rønning
* Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | | Gunnar =?iso-8859-1?q?R=F8nning?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | But anyway this off topic, what need to have is a build process that works | nicely and I think including the ant binaries(around 500k) would be the | best solution here. | | 500k of