At 00:28 25/02/01 +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>Peter Mount writes:
>
> > Actually I was waiting until 7.1 was out before rewriting the jdbc docs
> > >from scratch (so much has changed since those were written).
>
>I can see that. However, 7.1 users should still get the benefit of
>reasonably u
Peter Mount writes:
> Actually I was waiting until 7.1 was out before rewriting the jdbc docs
> >from scratch (so much has changed since those were written).
I can see that. However, 7.1 users should still get the benefit of
reasonably up to date documentation. I've at least changed all packag
At 16:00 23/02/01 +, Thomas Lockhart wrote:
> > Could we for now remove the formal class documentation from the DocBook
> > source, while keeping the narrative parts, and instead point people to the
> > JavaDoc? Could we make prebuild class documentation in HTML available to
> > users, maybe
At 22:07 22/02/01 +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>I've started to finish up the not-marked-up-yet parts of the JDBC
>documentation, but most of this seems to have once been generated by
>javadoc, and I feel like it is probably a wasted effort to try to manually
>convert this to DocBook.
Actually
Thomas Lockhart writes:
> > Could we for now remove the formal class documentation from the DocBook
> > source, while keeping the narrative parts, and instead point people to the
> > JavaDoc? Could we make prebuild class documentation in HTML available to
> > users, maybe where the jars are down
> Could we for now remove the formal class documentation from the DocBook
> source, while keeping the narrative parts, and instead point people to the
> JavaDoc? Could we make prebuild class documentation in HTML available to
> users, maybe where the jars are downloaded?
Works for me. Not sure i
