Re: [PATCHES] AIX FAQ - IPv6 Fun

2006-05-26 Thread Bruce Momjian
Applied. --- Chris Browne wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/opt/OXRS/sources/pgsql-HEAD/doc$ cvs diff -u FAQ_AIX > Index: FAQ_AIX > === > RCS file: /projects/cvsroot

[PATCHES] AIX FAQ - IPv6 Fun

2006-05-25 Thread Chris Browne
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/opt/OXRS/sources/pgsql-HEAD/doc$ cvs diff -u FAQ_AIX Index: FAQ_AIX === RCS file: /projects/cvsroot/pgsql/doc/FAQ_AIX,v retrieving revision 1.17 diff -c -u -r1.17 FAQ_AIX cvs diff: conflicting specifications of outp

Re: [PATCHES] AIX FAQ

2006-04-13 Thread Bruce Momjian
Patch applied. Thanks. Backpatched to 8.1.X. --- Chris Browne wrote: > Some of this may have already made it in; it's not totally clear... > > At any rate, here's a revision to CVS HEAD to reflect some changes by > mysel

[PATCHES] AIX FAQ

2006-04-06 Thread Chris Browne
Some of this may have already made it in; it's not totally clear... At any rate, here's a revision to CVS HEAD to reflect some changes by myself and by Seneca Cunningham for the AIX FAQ. It touches on the following issues: 1. memcpy pointer patch for dynahash.c 2. AIX memory management, which

Re: [PATCHES] AIX FAQ update

2005-12-08 Thread Bruce Momjian
Patch applied to CVS HEAD and 8.1.X. Thanks. --- Seneca Cunningham wrote: > FAQ_AIX in 8.1.0 contains outdated information about how to deal with > postgres problems due to readline. The attached patch replaces that > sec

[PATCHES] AIX FAQ update

2005-12-05 Thread Seneca Cunningham
FAQ_AIX in 8.1.0 contains outdated information about how to deal with postgres problems due to readline. The attached patch replaces that section of it with better ways of handling the problem. -- Seneca Cunningham [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- FAQ_AIX 2005/12/05 19:49:10 1.1 +++ FAQ_AIX 2005/12/05 19:5

Re: [PATCHES] AIX FAQ addition

2005-11-04 Thread Tom Lane
Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Of course, the patch is more than somewhat strange anyway. I don't think > it should be applied unless we actually know what's going on. Yeah. Just the first question it raises is: what else is broken, and where? regards, tom

Re: [PATCHES] AIX FAQ addition

2005-11-04 Thread Andrew Dunstan
Christopher Browne wrote: Actually, there is a reason NOT to apply the patch in general on all platforms; it introduces logic (an if {} else {} statement) in a place where there wasn't previously one, which *presumably* slows things down somewhat. I don't know if the memcpy() calls are invoke

Re: [PATCHES] AIX FAQ addition

2005-11-04 Thread Christopher Browne
> Chris Browne wrote: >> We haven't seen any agreement emerge as to what is causing AIX 5.3 ML3 >> to fail to successfully build the release candidates. >> >> However, a patch has emerged (thanks, Seneca!) that does allow it to >> work, and which I'd expect to be portable (better still!). >> >> W

Re: [PATCHES] AIX FAQ addition

2005-11-04 Thread Bruce Momjian
Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote: > Chris Browne wrote: > > We haven't seen any agreement emerge as to what is causing AIX 5.3 ML3 > > to fail to successfully build the release candidates. > > > > However, a patch has emerged (thanks, Seneca!) that does allow it to > > work, and which I'd expect to be p

Re: [PATCHES] AIX FAQ addition

2005-11-04 Thread Stefan Kaltenbrunner
Chris Browne wrote: > We haven't seen any agreement emerge as to what is causing AIX 5.3 ML3 > to fail to successfully build the release candidates. > > However, a patch has emerged (thanks, Seneca!) that does allow it to > work, and which I'd expect to be portable (better still!). > > We are sti

Re: [PATCHES] AIX FAQ addition

2005-11-04 Thread Bruce Momjian
Patch applied. Thanks. --- Chris Browne wrote: > We haven't seen any agreement emerge as to what is causing AIX 5.3 ML3 > to fail to successfully build the release candidates. > > However, a patch has emerged (thanks, Sen

[PATCHES] AIX FAQ addition

2005-11-02 Thread Chris Browne
We haven't seen any agreement emerge as to what is causing AIX 5.3 ML3 to fail to successfully build the release candidates. However, a patch has emerged (thanks, Seneca!) that does allow it to work, and which I'd expect to be portable (better still!). We are still actively pursuing why it breaks

Re: [PATCHES] AIX FAQ update for 5.3 socket address size issue

2005-10-24 Thread Bruce Momjian
Patch applied. Thanks. --- Chris Browne wrote: > IBM has addressed the socket address storage issue as of AIX 5.3 > maintenance level 5300-03; the following patch adds documentation to > FAQ_AIX... > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:O

[PATCHES] AIX FAQ update for 5.3 socket address size issue

2005-10-20 Thread Chris Browne
IBM has addressed the socket address storage issue as of AIX 5.3 maintenance level 5300-03; the following patch adds documentation to FAQ_AIX... [EMAIL PROTECTED]:OXRS/sources/pgsql-HEAD/doc> cvs diff -u FAQ_AIX Thursday 12:22:5

Re: [PATCHES] AIX FAQ Updates

2005-07-29 Thread Bruce Momjian
Patch applied to 8.0.X and HEAD. Thanks. --- Chris Browne wrote: > I believe this change will apply equally to 7.4, 8.0, and CVS HEAD. > > Index: FAQ_AIX >

[PATCHES] AIX FAQ Updates

2005-07-15 Thread Chris Browne
I believe this change will apply equally to 7.4, 8.0, and CVS HEAD. Index: FAQ_AIX === RCS file: /projects/cvsroot/pgsql/doc/FAQ_AIX,v retrieving revision 1.11 diff -c -u -r1.11 FAQ_AIX --- FAQ_AIX 12 Nov 2002 20:02:32 -