On Fri, 2006-12-22 at 16:48 -0500, Gregory Stark wrote:
Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Attached is the current state of my work on generalizing operator classes
into operator families, as per discussion last week. It's far from
ready to apply, but I thought I'd circulate it for
Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Attached is the current state of my work on generalizing operator classes
into operator families, as per discussion last week. It's far from
ready to apply, but I thought I'd circulate it for comments. What's done
is ...
Comments?
Didn't we say
Gregory Stark [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Didn't we say discussion should happen on -hackers so development progress
would be more visible?
140K patches don't belong on -hackers ...
regards, tom lane
---(end of
