I assume we no longer need this stats patch from May of 2006.
---
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian pgman@candle.pha.pa.us writes:
Have we seen any such failures since the first day they appeared?
Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian pgman@candle.pha.pa.us writes:
Have we seen any such failures since the first day they appeared?
agouti blew up about the same time you typed that, so yes it's still
a problem.
http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=agoutidt=2006-05-08%2003:15:01
Magnus Hagander wrote:
This was not ready to be applied, was it?
I don't recall any specific objections that weren't answered.
How about the fact that it's already caused one buildfarm failure?
http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=waspdt=2006
-04-30%2003:05:01
Bruce Momjian pgman@candle.pha.pa.us writes:
Was this fixed somehow? I don't see any more buildfarm failures, but I
didn't see a fix go in either. It is very possible the pgport fix I did
yesterday is related, but I have not applied it yet.
It's an intermittent failure; the fact you don't
Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian pgman@candle.pha.pa.us writes:
Was this fixed somehow? I don't see any more buildfarm failures, but I
didn't see a fix go in either. It is very possible the pgport fix I did
yesterday is related, but I have not applied it yet.
It's an intermittent failure;
Bruce Momjian pgman@candle.pha.pa.us writes:
Have we seen any such failures since the first day they appeared?
agouti blew up about the same time you typed that, so yes it's still
a problem.
http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=agoutidt=2006-05-08%2003:15:01
Magnus Hagander [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This was not ready to be applied, was it?
I don't recall any specific objections that weren't answered.
How about the fact that it's already caused one buildfarm failure?
http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=waspdt=2006-04-30%2003:05:01
This was not ready to be applied, was it?
I don't recall any specific objections that weren't answered.
How about the fact that it's already caused one buildfarm failure?
http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=waspdt=2006
-04-30%2003:05:01
Well, that objection certainly
Magnus Hagander wrote:
Per some earlier discussion, here is an attempt at
implementing a
delayed write of the pgstats file, to decrease the
write activity
on that file.
This was not ready to be applied, was it? An attempt
doesn't sound
to me like Magnus thought it was
Patch applied. Thanks.
---
Magnus Hagander wrote:
Per some earlier discussion, here is an attempt at implementing a
delayed write of the pgstats file, to decrease the write activity on
that file.
It changes so the
Bruce Momjian pgman@candle.pha.pa.us writes:
Patch applied. Thanks.
Magnus Hagander wrote:
Per some earlier discussion, here is an attempt at implementing a
delayed write of the pgstats file, to decrease the write activity on
that file.
This was not ready to be applied, was it? An attempt
Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian pgman@candle.pha.pa.us writes:
Patch applied. Thanks.
Magnus Hagander wrote:
Per some earlier discussion, here is an attempt at implementing a
delayed write of the pgstats file, to decrease the write activity on
that file.
This was not ready to be
Per some earlier discussion, here is an attempt at implementing a
delayed write of the pgstats file, to decrease the write activity on
that file.
It changes so the file is only written once every 5 minutes (changeable
of course, I just picked something) instead of once every half second.
It's
Magnus Hagander wrote:
Per some earlier discussion, here is an attempt at implementing a
delayed write of the pgstats file, to decrease the write activity on
that file.
It changes so the file is only written once every 5 minutes (changeable
of course, I just picked something) instead of
Per some earlier discussion, here is an attempt at implementing a
delayed write of the pgstats file, to decrease the write
activity on
that file.
It changes so the file is only written once every 5 minutes
(changeable of course, I just picked something) instead of
once every
Magnus Hagander [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
And it is now also written on backend request. A backend requests a
rewrite by simply sending a special stats message. It operates on the
assumption that the backends aren't actually going to read the
statistics file very often, compared to how
And it is now also written on backend request. A backend requests a
rewrite by simply sending a special stats message. It
operates on the
assumption that the backends aren't actually going to read the
statistics file very often, compared to how frequent it's
written today.
While
17 matches
Mail list logo
